Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers

[pugman]

Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers

|

Manager

|

Contact

|

Past Work

|

Payment

|

Max. participants

|

ANN

|

SMAS list

|

Campaigns managed

|

Default Trust

|

|

BoXXoB

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

BitDice Signature Campaign, BitDice Bounty

|

Bitcoin and Altcoins

|

20-30

|

Here

|

N/A

|

2

|

|

|

CryptopreneurBrainboss

|

PM, EMAIL, TELEGRAM.

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin and Altcoins

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

BrainLess List

|

7

|

|

|

DarkStar_

|

PM, TELEGRAM

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin and popular altcoins

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

DarkList™

|

7

|

|

|

Hhampuz

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

FortuneJack, Bitcore

|

Bitcoin/Ethereum

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

N/A

|

8

|

|

|

Hilariousandco

|

PM

|

Docademic

|

Bitcoin/Ethereum

|

Unlimiited

|

Here

|

N/A

|

8+

|

|

|

irfan_pak10

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM, WEBSITE

|

Past Work

|

Bitcoin/ Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash

|

4k+

|

Here

|

N/A

|

100+

|

|

|

LoyceV

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin, GBYTE or Blackbytes

|

50

|

Here

|

Public Blacklist

|

1

|

|

|

Lutpin*

|

EMAIL, PM

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin

|

N/A

|

Here

|

SMAS list

|

13

|

|

|

MadZ

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

IOS campaign

|

Bitcoin or tradable altcoins in the coinmarketcap top 100

|

100

|

N/A

|

N/A

|

1

|

|

|

OgNasty

|

EMAIL, PM,

|

Bitcoin.com, Rent-a-sig campaign

|

Bitcoin/Litecoin/Namecoin/Ravencoin

|

Unlimited

|

N/A

|

N/A

|

2

|

|

|

SFR10

|

PM

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

N/A

|

9

|

|

|

Yahoo62278

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin or Altcoin listed on a Top 3 exchange

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

SMAS list

|

50+

|

|

|

Coolcryptovator

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

Refer ANN

|

Bitcoin

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

N/A

|

6

|

|

|

Royse777

|

PM, TELEGRAM

|

Refer ANN

|

BTC, ETH, LTC, BNB, USDT or any other established coins

|

Max 55 participants

|

Here

|

Blacklisted bounty hunters

|

17

|

|

|

Little Mouse

|

EMAIL, PM, TELEGRAM

|

Refer ANN

|

BTC and Popular altcoins

|

Unlimited

|

Here

|

Private List

|

5

|

|

* - It means that the manager is currently having issues with his campaign/ or has been called by the community for non-trustworthy reasons.

^[1]Lutpin has been inactive, and hasn't paid his campaign participants in over 2 months, and hasn't even bothered to explain himself(yet). I'd strongly advise to be careful when contacting him until things get sorted out.
^[2]There is an active flag against Woshib proposed by Marlboroza here, and so its to be implied that users must be careful and aware of their dealings with Woshib.

Description:BoXXoB:

BoXXob has been managing the BitDice signature campaign for more than one and half years now,and users have been paid out every single week without any issues. The participants of BitDice signature campaign are very limited and their post quality is top-notch,thanks to BoXXoB for keeping a close eye to the participants. CryptopreneurBrainboss:

CryptopreneurBrainboss, one of the more newer additions to the list, has been quite an entrepreneur on this site dare I say. He's managing two of the longest running campaigns ever hosted on bitcointalk, and is handling things pretty smoothly. Dude knows how to get things, so no worries there. DarkStar_:

DarkStar_ is one of the best managers that I have ever worked along with! He offers loans,provides escrows and manages signature campaigns and much more. He has been managing ChipMixer campaign for more than a year now has paid every single week on time(Keep in mind that ChipMixer campaign is one of the higher paying campaigns)! He has managed to have a good list of participants for his campaigns and he makes sure that the participants are not engaged in spamming. I personally recommend DarkStar_ because he is a top-rated campaign manager.
Hhampuz:

Hhampuz,one of the cherished members in the Collectibles section has been managing campaigns for a while now, and has been trusted with Hundreds of thousands of dollars. He has known to have so many trades,auctions,raffles,and much more in the collectibles section,making him a true hardcore bitcoiner. He keeps his head high,respects people and strives to deliver whatever he promises every single time and makes it his topmost priority to make all the parties involved happy at the end of the day.
Hilariousandco:

Hilariousandco,a Lamborghini Member, is a global moderator of this forum and is one of the biggest contributors in bitcointalk history. This user knows a lot about bitcoin and bitcointalk. He has been actively fighting against spammers and is a one of the few reliable members of the forum. He is one of the very few users who is trusted by a great deal of people in bitcointalk.  
irfan_pak10:

irfan_pak10,founder of bountyportals.com has been an early bitcoin enthusiast,and is the current CEO of his website(bountyportals.com) He has managed more than 45 campaigns and all of them have been a great success. This user has a lot of experience and can handle more than 4000 participants per campaign. They have distributed more than 300BTC and have more than 10,000 bounty hunters on their platform.
izanagi narukami:

izanagi narukami is one of the old bitcointalk managers,and has done a great job in all of his campaigns. He also designs signatures for campaigns and is amazing at what he does. Even though he is not a native English speaker,he knows what he is up against and always delivers his best. Whichever campaign he manages,he makes sure that there are no spammers involved.

One of the ogs, while no longer active and aren't on the table, cannot just forget.
Lauda:

Lauda, current DT2 member has been helping the community for years now. He/she manages campaigns, bounties professionally and ethically. He/she is a part of Crypto escrow team(CET) and is also a part of ACE- AD Campaign Experts. Lauda keeps his/her word and delivers as expected every single time. Lauda has been fighting against spammers,scammers and has proven to be one of the best.

One of the ogs, while no longer active and aren't on the table, cannot just forget.
Loyce V:

Loyce V,one of the best posters in bitcointalk,has been known to be the great Spam Buster of this forum. He has managed to report thousands of accounts who have been caught breaking the rules,and has managed a lot of rollin.io giveaways. He has also been a mod at rollin.io and is one heck of a bitcoiner. His knowledge of bitcoin is unquestionable and is always on the verge to help this forum and this community as a whole.
Lutpin:

Lutpin,one of the best campaign managers of bitcointalk has managed a lot of long-term campaigns of this forum. He is also an early bitcoiner and has a great knowledge of gambling sites. He has been managing the Crypto Games campaign for 4 years now and 3 other campaigns for more than 1 and a half years. He has paid out more than 60BTC to his participants and really does a wonderful job. He is also a part of ACE- AD Campaign Experts,along with a few other reputed members.
MadZ:

MadZ,an active DT2 member has spent a great deal of time busting scammers and helping out users. He has been managing the IOS campaign and has paid out more than 150,000$ to the participants in Bitcoin and tokens. He is also an active trader and is a reputed person in this forum. He keeps his head high and doesn't let his judgment waver.
notaek:

notaek, one of the early bitcoiners,has been managing campaigns for years now. He has been managing the Nitrogen Sports campaign for more than one and a half years now,and has paid out his participants week after week. He also has a great knowledge of bitcoin,and is a very straight-forward friendly person. Any issues that arise around him,are taken care of promptly and smoothly.


One of the ogs, while no longer active and aren't on the table, cannot just forget.
OgNasty:

OgNasty is the most trusted person in bitcointalk. He has done thousands of trades and has managed to escrow over 19,000BTC thus far. He has managed Bitcoin.com's signature campaign and has also been managing the Rent-a-sig campaign,by renting trusted member's signatures,and has been paying them out every month for the past year,right on time. This user is strictly professional and doesn't let his personal business come in between his professional business.
SFR10:

SFR10 has to be one of the most kindest, helpful, and insanely talented people on this forum. He has run several campaigns in the past, all of which have gone smoothly well, and not only does he manage campaigns, he also does a lot of designing like making signatures, avatar etc. He even made me an avatar for FREE of cost!! A very humble dude, would recommend. We need more people like him on and off this forum
Woshib:

Woshib,one of the more experienced campaign managers,has managed more than 20 campaigns so far. This user is an active trader in the collectibles section,and offers a great deal in campaign management. He has paid out more than 150BTC worth of tokens to his campaign participants. He handles his campaigns smoothly without any issues.

One of the ogs, while no longer active and aren't on the table, cannot just forget.
Yahoo62278:

Yahoo62278,is THE campaign manager. He has been voted to be the best campaign manager,and has the most experience of managing campaigns. He has paid out around 100-200BTC to his participants and has even paid out of his own pocket,when he got scammed himself. He is highly professional in his campaign management,is also an active scam buster in this forum.
Coolcryptovator:

Coolcryptovator, is one of the more new and upcoming managers on this forum. He is a great lad, looks out for the people on this forum every day, and has busted several scams. He may not be a native english speaker, but what he does for this forum speaks more than his words. We need more people like him, and he therefore, has my full support for his campaign management.
Royse777:

Royse777 is one of the nicest guys I have come across on this forum, and has ran over 17 campaigns, all of them being run smoothly, and has managed campaigns and paid over 100,000$ in payment to the campaign participants. Let that speak for itself.


Little Mouse:

Little Mouse, not so little member of the forum in terms of their contribution; has helped the forum in many ways, and has been a campaign manager for well over 3 years. Very upfront and a person who talks to the point, and is very well received by the community.

Disclaimer:

- The above information is strictly meant for professional purposes only. Misuse of information may warrant you a negative trust rating or even a ban,if you break the forum rules^[1].

- The campaign managers have been added to the list based on my judgement. I reserve the right to add or remove any campaign manager.

- Please don't leave any negative unwanted comments on the managers here.

- I reserve the right to add or remove any disclaimers/rules in this thread.

- If anyone wishes to be added on the list,feel free to PM me,and I'll add you only if you're fit to be on the list,based on my judgement.  

- The list comprises of anti-spam managers only.

- This is an unofficial thread of campaign managers.

- If you do not wish to run a signature campaign,you can always rent a forum space ad,but its only for non-ICOs. ^[2]

- If any information in this thread is incorrect, please feel free to correct me.

- Do your own due diligence on the managers,even if the managers are trusted^[3] and always ask for a bitcoin signed message/PGP signed message^[4], before sending or receiving any funds.

- You and the relevant manager are to be held responsible,if anything goes wrong.
 Refer Links:

1. Forum rules

2. Bitcointalk ad info

3. Default Trust

4. Bitcoin signed message/ PGP signed message.

5. Thanks Mitchell for the thread format. I ripped it off him hehe. Let's all wish these managers to lead this forum to be spam free,and encourage them to help the crypto-community.

[1713926123]

1713926123

[1713926123]

1713926123

[1713926123]

1713926123

[1713926123]

1713926123

[1713926123]

1713926123

[pugman]

Reserved.

[mdayonliner]

Great job on the list. Good to read especially the little introductions under the list. Looks like some of these members has huge experiences.


update2:
Please ignore below. I got my answers.
update1:

DT

Trust is relative, isn't it? The trust we see is based on our own trust settings. So we are seeing pugman's trust setting in OP. My end it will be different and in your end it will be something else. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong? I may be wrong in understanding the trust system.

But, If I am right then may be trust column  need not to be added.

[InvoKing]

Nice work. The default trust appears to be good solution to rate them although for Lauda it will be a negative point especially if the person who is willing to hire them hasn't a forum account.
I would recommend an asterisk for lauda instead of showing his DT and add comments on the text about it. (that's my opinion ofc)

[pugman]

Nice work. The default trust appears to be good solution to rate them although for Lauda it will be a negative point especially if the person who is willing to hire them hasn't a forum account.
I would recommend an asterisk for lauda instead of showing his DT and add comments on the text about it. (that's my opinion ofc)

I thought about it too,but there's a conflict between the managers . Personal feuds shouldn't come in between of professionalism. But thank you,if more people want it,I'll add some info .

Great job on the list. Good to read especially the little introductions under the list. Looks like some of these members has huge experiences.

Thanks.

[mdayonliner]

Great job on the list. Good to read especially the little introductions under the list. Looks like some of these members has huge experiences.

Thanks.

You deserve the good words. By the way I have updated my last post above, I will appreciate your feedback. I might need to review the original trust system topic again.

[pugman]

Trust is relative, isn't it? The trust we see is based on our own trust settings. So we are seeing pugman's trust setting in OP. My end it will be different and in your end it will be something else. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong? I may be wrong in understanding the trust system.

But, If I am right then may be trust column  need not to be added.

The trust ratings above are not based on my trust settings. The ratings are purely default,meaning the ones that everybody sees. I didn't the ratings based on my settings,as that would be biased.

[mdayonliner]

Trust is relative, isn't it? The trust we see is based on our own trust settings. So we are seeing pugman's trust setting in OP. My end it will be different and in your end it will be something else. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong? I may be wrong in understanding the trust system.

But, If I am right then may be trust column  need not to be added.

The trust ratings above are not based on my trust settings. The ratings are purely default,meaning the ones that everybody sees. I didn't the ratings based on my settings,as that would be biased.

Can you see this
I believe this is how we set the DefaultTrust? If yes then now I see totally different ratings for above members. It does not match with the original post, my previous post (the post under OP).

What am I missing?  

update:
Thanks pugman and InvoKing
I was in dark LOL

 

[InvoKing]

-snip-

Check the image again and change the number 4 to 2, normally you will see then the correct default trust rating (and let's try to stay on topic ).

[LoyceV]

- The thread will be self-moderated to avoid unnecessary spam.

I forget to activate that all the time too

Just posting here to read updates. Thanks for doing this!

[pugman]

- The thread will be self-moderated to avoid unnecessary spam.

I forget to activate that all the time too

Damn it,you caught hold of it before I removed it . Yeah I forgot too.

Just posting here to read updates. Thanks for doing this!

Its my pleasure. I'll make sure to keep this one updated.

[DarkStar_]

DarkStar_:
He has been managing ChipMixer campaign for more than a year now has paid every single week on time

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)

[hilariousandco]

How about including rank and/or sign-up date?

You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once? I suspect people have given both. They can also be misleading. Somebody holding 1 bitcoin a hundred times doesn't mean they can be trusted with 100 bitcoins. Also, somebody holding 100 bitcoins five years or so ago probably wouldn't even be worth 1 bitcoin now. The figure I gave was the highest amount I've held at any one time and was probably over £10k cash value at the time, and I think things like these should be stipulated as they can be very misleading or even give a false sense of security. In this case I think the highest value people have held at any one time is a better indicator. Somebody could quite easily hold on to many small amounts dozens of times until his total is 10 bitcoins or whatever then just disappear if anyone every gives him a large amount at once.

Hilariousandco:

Hilariousandco,a Lamborghini Member,

The one and only. Skurrt skurrt.

He on one of the person who is trusted by a great deal of people in bitcointalk,including theymos.  

You should probably remove the part including theymos (unless he's said otherwise). He may trust me to moderate the forum at a Global level but this doesn't necessarily mean he would vouch for me to hold onto large amounts of cash (or run signature campaigns - not that he doesn't or wouldn't but I feel unless he's specifically said this it shouldn't be here and may give me an unfair advantage).

[DarkStar_]

You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once?

I asked him to clarify and he responded that it's over their lifetime. I do think that maximum amount held at one point is a much better representation.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Props for this nicely-presented list, pugman.  I honestly did not realize there were this many bitcoin-paying sig campaigns still in existence.

I've had good experiences with Yahoo62278, Lutpin, and DarkStar_.  All of them are honest and straighforward and run their campaigns quite well.  I can't speak for the other managers, since I haven't participated in any of their campaigns, but I haven't heard any complaints about them--and that speaks volumes.  Anyone who aspires to be a campaign manager would do well to try to emulate how these individuals operate.

Haven't heard much about SMAS lately.  Is that list still being updated?  The number of spammers certainly hasn't decreased by any means.  I think SMAS was one of the best proactive measures to come along in quite some time.

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)

Must not have been in months, because that hasn't happened since I've been a part of the Chipmixer campaign.

[shahzadafzal]

good work @pugman I guess the delay has paid off... finally you have well sorted list of campaign managers.

One question what is this Advertisement space for? Are you going to put your own advertisements here or will be from bitcointalk?

Because this is normal post page and default ad from bitcointalk, after first post will automatically be displayed.

[hilariousandco]

You should probably clarify or confirm those escrowed amounts as well as some of them seem way off. Are they total amounts held over their lifetime or all at once?

I asked him to clarify and he responded that it's over their lifetime. I do think that maximum amount held at one point is a much better representation.

Yeah, it's just way too misleading as it is. Also, very hard to validate and I have absolutely no idea how much money I have held over my lifetime here (and I suspect the others don't and are more likely to be estimates). Anyone could just make a figure up if it's not validated, but it's fairly easy to confirm the total amount someone has held at once and I think that is a more telling figure as that's a figure they have previously been trusted to hold on to. I think listing figures like hundreds of bitcoins could easily mislead or confuse people. Probably should be listed in fiat as well for the reasons I mentioned before.

[pugman]

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)

The participants were paid at the end of the day. The participants had no problems with the payments being delayed one day because they trust you. Thank you for being honest, I'll try to edit the post when I get back home.

How about including rank and/or sign-up date?

All the campaign managers are hero members at least. The list is already too big, I had to delete a column(the one stating about other campaigns being handled by managers) because the list became too wide.

In this case I think the highest value people have held at any one time is a better indicator. Somebody could quite easily hold on to many small amounts dozens of times until his total is 10 bitcoins or whatever then just disappear if anyone every gives him a large amount at once.

I don't think anybody in the list will risk all their reputation and run away with a few bitcoins. But still I'll make changes to that column, and add the highest amount escrowed at one time to the list.

You should probably remove the part including theymos (unless he's said otherwise). He may trust me to moderate the forum at a Global level but this doesn't necessarily mean he would vouch for me to hold onto large amounts of cash (or run signature campaigns - not that he doesn't or wouldn't but I feel unless he's specifically said this it shouldn't be here and may give me an unfair advantage).

Very well.

Props for this nicely-presented list, pugman.  I honestly did not realize there were this many bitcoin-paying sig campaigns still in existence.

I've had good experiences with Yahoo62278, Lutpin, and DarkStar_.  All of them are honest and straighforward and run their campaigns quite well.  I can't speak for the other managers, since I haven't participated in any of their campaigns, but I haven't heard any complaints about them--and that speaks volumes.  Anyone who aspires to be a campaign manager would do well to try to emulate how these individuals operate.

Haven't heard much about SMAS lately.  Is that list still being updated?  The number of spammers certainly hasn't decreased by any means.  I think SMAS was one of the best proactive measures to come along in quite some time.

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)

Must not have been in months, because that hasn't happened since I've been a part of the Chipmixer campaign.

Thank you for the kind words. Yes, SMAS is being updated, atleast by yahoo62278 and Lauda.

good work @pugman I guess the delay has paid off... finally you have well sorted list of campaign managers.

One question what is this Advertisement space for? Are you going to put your own advertisements here or will be from bitcointalk?

Because this is normal post page and default ad from bitcointalk, after first post will automatically be displayed.

The delay was because I was typing fast, I somehow deleted the entire page, luckily I had saved half of the page in word. So I had to retype again.  
The advertisement is for anybody who wants to advertise their business. I expected that this thread might get a few more views than the normal threads of bitcointalk. Credit goes to Mitchell for that.  

Yeah, it's just way too misleading as it is. Also, very hard to validate and I have absolutely no idea how much money I have held over my lifetime here (and I suspect the others don't and are more likely to be estimates). Anyone could just make a figure up if it's not validated, but it's fairly easy to confirm the total amount someone has held at once and I think that is a more telling figure as that's a figure they have previously been trusted to hold on to. I think listing figures like hundreds of bitcoins could easily mislead or confuse people. Probably should be listed in fiat as well for the reasons I mentioned before.

I understand how it could be misleading. I am sorry for causing the confusion here. What I meant was how much have the campaign managers paid out their pastime throughout their campaign management experience. I'll change that info in a few hours. I am currently not near my computer.

[hilariousandco]

good work @pugman I guess the delay has paid off... finally you have well sorted list of campaign managers.

One question what is this Advertisement space for? Are you going to put your own advertisements here or will be from bitcointalk?

Because this is normal post page and default ad from bitcointalk, after first post will automatically be displayed.

Didn't notice that. He may just be copying Mitchel's thread, but did you get permission from theymos to advertise there as you need to get the go-ahead from an admin to do that and it's rarely granted?

I don't think anybody in the list will risk all their reputation and run away with a few bitcoins. But still I'll make changes to that column, and add the highest amount escrowed at one time to the list.

Three bitcoins is over $20,000. You can't see why someone would just keep that for themselves? There have been campaign managers and escrows that have or have tried to scam for much less. There are several users on the list who I have no reason to trust with such an amount, but that again is why the most held at once is a much better indicator here.

[InvoKing]

the most held at once is a much better indicator here.

This one.
And it should be displayed with USD at the moment the amount was held by the manager.
100 BTC +4 years ago are less than 3 BTC nowadays.