Bitcointalk Cartel

[Nomercyforthedirty]

What do you think of the very few people given an outstanding amount of power that are running this forum just as a drug cartel ?

The people who deliberately abuse the trust system ruin accounts sometimes even legendary for nothing just because they have the power to do so.

They are trying to enforce the rule of no negative feedback in signature campaigns so they can get all the money for them and their paid shills.

If they give you a negative feedback they never remove it even when they realise it was an unfair feedback.

Anytime there is some fight going on and some user want to shout about their unjust feedback received from default trust network members the cartel band comes and protect each other by giving more negative feedback without any valid reason.

They claim to be believing in decentralisation but this forum has become a centralised Federal Reserve of Bitcoin. These guys run things around here and do not care about decentralisation at all as long as their pocket are full money.

Isn't that just what Federal Reserve, VISA and the Rockfellers do with FIAT money ?

In Germany when the government raised the price of fuel more than one million people left their cars in the middle of the streets blocking all circulation. I think if we do the same no more people will be interested in this forum and will be the end of this cartel.

I am not talking with my main account as expressing what you feel here gets your reputation bombarded with red without valid reasons.

Have a nice day everyone.

[1714041717]

1714041717

[Vod]

If they give you a negative feedback they never remove it even when they realise it was an unfair feedback.

That's not always true - I have removed negative feedback I have left dozens of times.

[digaran]

If they give you a negative feedback they never remove it even when they realise it was an unfair feedback.

That's not always true - I have removed negative feedback I have left dozens of times.

Admitting to be a member of this cartel I see. 
Note that I know that you said I don't deserve to get tagged by suchmoon for my service. I appreciate it.

[jc01480]

Yeah, I’m all for term limits.  Some mods in particular seem to swirl in controversy and conflict. 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

OP, thanks for bringing the fact that you're an account seller to my attention.  I've reinforced Lauda's feedback on you.

As to your question here, I've never had a problem with DT members in my entire time on the forum--except those in Quickseller's corner, which would be OGNasty and Tomatocage, but not because I scammed anybody. 

This is a forum in chaos, and there is a small cadre of DT members trying to clean it up one shit stain at a time.  I wouldn't compare it to a Mexican drug cartel, however.  Those people are animals who throw their victims into vats of acid, and I have never done anything of the sort.  It's too bad, so sad, that you got tagged but that's what you get for selling a bitcointalk account.  Doing that enables shitposters to get into campaigns to spam and it also allows the buyer to use the reputation of the account to possibly scam.  It's dishonest and it's very much frowned upon by not only DT members, but a lot of others as well.

[Nomercyforthedirty]

This post is not about me and you can add as much red as you want to this account.

This post is about the abusive members of bitcoin talk cartel. You are worst than a mexican drug cartel as the drug cartel doesn't care about you if you don't interfere with their business.

You being one of the most abusive members together with actmyname, lauda, suchmoon and marlboroza.

I still haven't seen an honest answer to my question yet.

Very few people are destroying accounts and I am not talking about shitposters and bounty abusers but normal accounts.

Probably you are all connected to each other and run this boogus here at bitcoin talk.

If you clean shitposters and bounty abusers that is a good thing but you are damaging more good accounts than scammers.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Here are some of the trust ratings you have left:



You sound like a 12 year kid whose mom bought the wrong flavor of doritos and was just killed one too many times on Xbox Live. I'm sure you will forgive me for treating your opinions on the trust system with the utter derision they deserve.

[digaran]

Here are some of the trust ratings you have left:



You sound like a 12 year kid whose mom bought the wrong flavor of doritos and was just killed one too many times on Xbox Live. I'm sure you will forgive me for treating your opinions on the trust system with the utter derision they deserve.

What is it with you people and underaged kids? am I the only one here who'd talk about legal age of people when mentioning something about young people?

This o_e_l_e_o is an alt account of some deranged pervert who likes 11, 12 years old kids very much.

[o_e_l_e_o]

This o_e_l_e_o is an alt account of some deranged pervert who likes 11, 12 years old kids very much.

Yup, that's exactly what I said. (/s. I know the /s tag here is blatantly obvious to literally everyone else, but digaran seems to have an exceptionally hard time separating fact from fiction.)

[suchmoon]

What is it with you people and underaged kids? am I the only one here who'd talk about legal age of people when mentioning something about young people?

This o_e_l_e_o is an alt account of some deranged pervert who likes 11, 12 years old kids very much.

You clearly have some unresolved issues on this subject:


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

[o_e_l_e_o]

-snip-

Wow. Just wow. If you are a reddit user, you could post this to /r/sadcringe and reap mad karma.

[marlboroza]

OP do you still follow tipsters on bitcointalk? 

[Nomercyforthedirty]

OP do you still follow tipsters on bitcointalk? 

At the beginning yes but after a few wins I lost a lot of money following them so no, I don't follow tipsters anymore. I don't understand your question ?

[Joel_Jantsen]

Bitcointalk Cartel - That's a catchy name.

The problem with DT system is the feedback left by owlCatz on your profile "Probable alt of Quickscammer" without any references or valuable insights as in why they find you untrusthworthy. You definitely deserve the feedback as tagged by The Pharmacist but ownlCat's feedback is not justified.I would never take a feedback seriously if it is as random as this.

*Adjusts my trust settings*

[suchmoon]

Bitcointalk Cartel - That's a catchy name.

The problem with DT system is the feedback left by owlCatz on your profile "Probable alt of Quickscammer" without any references or valuable insights as in why they find you untrusthworthy. You definitely deserve the feedback as tagged by The Pharmacist but ownlCat's feedback is not justified.I would never take a feedback seriously if it is as random as this.

*Adjusts my trust settings*

Owlz is not in DT1 or DT2.

[Nomercyforthedirty]

My main account is with green trust but posting this thread by that it would mean dt members will ruin it just as they do with many accounts.

I have started selling accounts after seeing a legendary account get ruined by Lauda only because someone was bumping an Ico thread. I sold him another legendary to help him as I do not agree with negative trust for just bumping a thread or shilling for some Ico, even dt members shill for gunbot in their signatures.

[Joel_Jantsen]

Owlz is not in DT1 or DT2.

Oh their feedback just appeared as trusted.Maybe it's my trust settings which I fixed.

My main account is with green trust but posting this thread by that it would mean dt members will ruin it just as they do with many accounts.

Why do you need so many accounts ? Maybe you are just bullshitting that you have a green trusted account.

I have started selling accounts after seeing a legendary account get ruined by Lauda only because someone was bumping an Ico thread. I sold him another legendary to help him as I do not agree with negative trust for just bumping a thread or shilling for some Ico, even dt members shill for gunbot in their signatures.

Bumping ICO threads totally deserves a negative feedback.Forum doesn't work out with what you think is right especially when you are dumb enough to not realise how bumping ICO threads leads to other forum problems.Also no one is shilling for GunBot, they are paid for the signature.I have left you a negative feedback for being dumb enough to appreciate ICO bumping.

[marlboroza]

OP do you still follow tipsters on bitcointalk? 

At the beginning yes but after a few wins I lost a lot of money following them so no, I don't follow tipsters anymore. I don't understand your question ?

I think you do.

[Nomercyforthedirty]

OP do you still follow tipsters on bitcointalk? 

At the beginning yes but after a few wins I lost a lot of money following them so no, I don't follow tipsters anymore. I don't understand your question ?

I think you do.

I don't

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I have started selling accounts after seeing a legendary account get ruined by Lauda only because someone was bumping an Ico thread. I sold him another legendary to help him as I do not agree with negative trust for just bumping a thread or shilling for some Ico, even dt members shill for gunbot in their signatures.

That's the worst excuse for selling accounts I've ever heard.  Lauda's negative was probably for being paid to thread-bump, which is much different than using your signature space for advertising.  There was a rash of users agreeing to do the former who got caught in a sting operation thing, started by Aventhe (if I'm not mistaken).  They were basically agreeing to spam for bitcoin.

I don't tag account buyers and sellers just for the hell of it.  Account dealers facilitate scams and promote shitposting--I've said this so many times, and I don't feel like writing out a treatise here on why I feel they're untrustworthy.  Every case is different, of course, but most of the people I've tagged are serial sellers, and they're the worst, but anyone who sells an account here is doing a disservice to bitcointalk.

[Nomercyforthedirty]

The guy who was left negative feedback by Lauda said that he didn't know that this was not allowed at that time.

He begged Lauda many times yet Lauda just kept ignoring him and bashing him even more.

That is not the behavior I like to see from default trust members. The account as legendary and was a helpful one to the community.

After considering all these facts I decided to help him as he told me that his reputation was ruined in no time after he had build that account for many years.

I couldn't say no to him.

Back to my side business as you say account selling. I was right about you being a bitcoin cartel. That shows that trust ratings can be abused by many dt members and do not work effectively.

[mrcash02]

In Germany when the government raised the price of fuel more than one million people left their cars in the middle of the streets blocking all circulation. I think if we do the same no more people will be interested in this forum and will be the end of this cartel.

The problem is that instead of fighting for what they think it's right, people prefer to go through the easiest path, abandoning their negatived accounts and buying a new one to start over again, consequently they go shady, what legitimates the inquisitors actions against them.

I am not talking with my main account as expressing what you feel here gets your reputation bombarded with red without valid reasons.

If we want things start changing we shouldn't fear retaliations. If the cause is legit, there is no need to hide ourselves behind anonymous accounts.
However this kind of sent feedback doesn't help you to be taken seriously by others...

Think twice before acting during the angry moments and keep your composure!