Legendary account 'MintCondition' with green trust has very likely been hacked

[Stalker22]

~
I have no way to defend against all the allegations for potential connections that happened before 2019 because this account was gifted to me by one of my client on insurance during those years. You will notice on my post history that insurance topic is my first ever thread I created in this forum because that’s the only thing I have expertise.
~

Even with the best intentions of giving you the benefit of the doubt, I find it hard to believe you would actually accept such a "gift."  What is the advantage of an account that, as you claim, had almost no value (low rank, no merit)?  How was it better for you than creating your own account and starting from scratch?  As far as I can see, you have cleaned up most of the post history since the account was used mainly for bounty hunting.

But that is not even the main issue here.  The transactions connecting all these accounts were made just a few days before your supposedly first post on the forum (October 7, 2019, and October 10, 2019, respectively).  That is quite a coincidence.  Besides, there is no evidence of a password change on your account during that period.  How is that?

[Wapfika]

~
I have no way to defend against all the allegations for potential connections that happened before 2019 because this account was gifted to me by one of my client on insurance during those years. You will notice on my post history that insurance topic is my first ever thread I created in this forum because that’s the only thing I have expertise.
~

Even with the best intentions of giving you the benefit of the doubt, I find it hard to believe you would actually accept such a "gift."  What is the advantage of an account that, as you claim, had almost no value (low rank, no merit)?  How was it better for you than creating your own account and starting from scratch?  As far as I can see, you have cleaned up most of the post history since the account was used mainly for bounty hunting.

But that is not even the main issue here.  The transactions connecting all these accounts were made just a few days before your supposedly first post on the forum (October 7, 2019, and October 10, 2019, respectively).  That is quite a coincidence.  Besides, there is no evidence of a password change on your account during that period.  How is that?

Due to the evil IP when I created my first account.

I don’t need to change password immediately because I don’t value this account initially when I received it. I have no idea about the potential connection of the account since I just read first and try to understand for many weeks before I start posting.

I didn’t use the account upon received because I’m still in the process of learning. Not changing the password immediately also show that I didn’t purchase it or else I should change password immediately since I will value it due to the money involved. Also, why would I still post and put efforts on my account growth if I knew that there’s a ticking time bomb multiple account connection on my account?

There’s no PM or notification even on the first connection on the account. You are assuming that user should regularly check this board to see if their account has connection.

@Nutildah, I’m not trying to fight the red tag. You guys are asking for explanation which I given to you upfront upon notification via PM. I already informed LM for the connection so just an FYI that I’m not eager to justify my account situation for the sake of my campaign earnings. I use the forum without violating the forum rules.

There’s life outside the forum. Bitcoin was become popular on the Philippines through Bitcoin facebook group not Bitcointalk. So don’t expect that all transactions should be recorded here just to avoid being connected to each other. Actually, it’s already destroying the purpose of doing seamless P2P since your work now requires to record all transactions here first to avoid account connection just for the sake of policing signature campaign.

[Stalker22]

~ I use the forum without violating the forum rules.

However, as I suspected, that is not true at all.  Your post history tells a completely different story.

Your account is already linked to an account farm and a bunch of other bounty cheaters, but even if I were to actually believe your lame story about a "gifted" account, and pretend you are not responsible for whatever happened to it before 2019, I have another piece of evidence for you - and you are going to have a painfully hard time lying your way out of this one.

You used this btc addy to apply to the sinbad(.)io signature campaign:

Current number of post (Including this one): 854
Rank: Senior Member
bech32 address: bc1qn2a82e5cemcqacwzq4sfzsze284l0hpjl5xvxw
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 46

The post was later deleted but there is an archived reference: https://bitlist.co/post/62232721
<snip>

EDIT:
I have edited the post since Wapfika claims it was just a copy-paste error.  I think thats a plausible explanation, so we should probably disregard this piece of evidence.  It was my mistake for missing it during the initial investigation, since both posts were deleted later on.

[Wapfika]

~ I use the forum without violating the forum rules.

However, as I suspected, that is not true at all.  Your post history tells a completely different story.

Your account is already linked to an account farm and a bunch of other bounty cheaters, but even if I were to actually believe your lame story about a "gifted" account, and pretend you are not responsible for whatever happened to it before 2019, I have another piece of evidence for you - and you are going to have a painfully hard time lying your way out of this one.

You used this btc addy to apply to the sinbad(.)io signature campaign:

Current number of post (Including this one): 854
Rank: Senior Member
bech32 address: bc1qn2a82e5cemcqacwzq4sfzsze284l0hpjl5xvxw
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 46

The post was later deleted but there is an archived reference: https://bitlist.co/post/62232721

The exact same address was later used multiple times by 2double0, a well-known scammer, ban evader, and loan defaulter:

Applying for avatar only
bech32 address: bc1qn2a82e5cemcqacwzq4sfzsze284l0hpjl5xvxw

Because 2double0 is already tied to a negative reputation and a long list of alt accounts, this proves not only that you broke the forum rules, but that you are part of a much larger account farm.  This network has been used for scams, cheating, and various other malicious activities on the forum for years.  It looks like we have only scratched the surface here.

Here are some relevant posts for reference:
[1] - Loan Defaulted [2double0]
[2] - nutildah's post about some of 2double0 alt accounts

It’s a copy paste error on application that’s why I deleted it. The screenshot show that we applied on the same campaign. That’s the only time that I use the wallet address.

The account that you mentioned is clearly doesn’t have any similarities to me if you will do a thorough review on our post history. I’m not familiar with him. I regularly post on local board while that user seems too knowledgeable on forum technicalities.

He is also a frequent loaner while I don’t do financial dealings here. Are you suggesting that he is willing to sacrifice his account for a loan default because he has a back up account like mine while his post history is much better than mine even until now?

[Stalker22]

~
It’s a copy paste error on application that’s why I deleted it. The screenshot show that we applied on the same campaign. That’s the only time that I use the wallet address.
~

You are probably right about this, and it was my mistake for not catching 2double0's post before yours during my initial investigation - since both posts were later deleted.  I have updated my previous post to reflect this.

[Wapfika]

~
It’s a copy paste error on application that’s why I deleted it. The screenshot show that we applied on the same campaign. That’s the only time that I use the wallet address.
~

You are probably right about this, and it was my mistake for not catching 2double0's post before yours during my initial investigation - since both posts were later deleted.  I have updated my previous post to reflect this.

I appreciate the acknowledgement. I might stop or delay my participation on this investigation because I already taking a vacation from the use of the forum.

My account already have a negative trust while I have no active campaigns participation. I already spent most of my time here since the day I made my explanation to justify that I’m not ignoring any allegations on my account involvement here.

I’m taking an off without any pending financial dealings.

[Stalker22]

I appreciate the acknowledgement. I might stop or delay my participation on this investigation because I already taking a vacation from the use of the forum.

My account already have a negative trust while I have no active campaigns participation. I already spent most of my time here since the day I made my explanation to justify that I’m not ignoring any allegations on my account involvement here.

I’m taking an off without any pending financial dealings.

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account?  There is already blockchain evidence linking that account to the same farm, and I see that he is also your "merit buddy."


https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Wapfika

I would be interested in hearing your explanation before I publish my findings.

[AakZaki]

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account?  There is already blockchain evidence linking that account to the same farm, and I see that he is also your "merit buddy."

If you ask a question like this, I don't think the person in question will answer here and will probably get away with it as well. Try directly tagging RedTrust to AbuBhakar. I think that way he will answer it here.

The discovery of the connected address was originally also found by FinneysTrueVision here, and your discovery is also valid that they are a connected account. If in the end AbuBhakar denies it, I will say it myself later and verify that they are in the same campaign.

That's why AbuBhakar has been inactive since February 28, 2026, I think their brains are going dumb for using multiple accounts to post.

[FinneysTrueVision]

A Binance deposit address, separate from the one shared by AbuBhakar and Beparanf, was shared between AbuBhakar and Wapfika bc1qyljchfh359m8slztpp2sqt92ky723wm5zshyyq



Three users belonging to this farm, AbuBhakar, Wapfika and Eternad were part of the Megapari signature campaign managed by Royse777 during the same timeframe.

https://bitlist.co/post/61831162

Code:

bounceback
Pesona1
nimogsm
capedbaldy
Xcode7
Wapfika
Getmon
AbuBhakar
Eternad
libert19

[Wapfika]

I appreciate the acknowledgement. I might stop or delay my participation on this investigation because I already taking a vacation from the use of the forum.

My account already have a negative trust while I have no active campaigns participation. I already spent most of my time here since the day I made my explanation to justify that I’m not ignoring any allegations on my account involvement here.

I’m taking an off without any pending financial dealings.

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account?  There is already blockchain evidence linking that account to the same farm, and I see that he is also your "merit buddy."


https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Wapfika

I would be interested in hearing your explanation before I publish my findings.

Since we know each other through our social media group. It’s easy to give merit to someone that you have in common agreement with opinion. Even on other local board user has a favorites to send merit on close circle but it’s done on post that we agreed in common ground not just a regular spam post. Our local board has very low merit circulation unlike other local board with many merit source that’s why we have less merit to share and even a local group of high merit do this kind of favorite to send users.

There will surely be a blockchain evidence of transactions within us because we do financial dealings on the group or social media PM as our identity was known to everyone due to our social media accounts so there’s already a mutual trust than forum dealings that normally an anonymous P2P that requires recording. So if I’m borrowing money to someone that I personally knew or the opposite, do we need to post here first before we proceed our transaction? Isn’t it out of forum jurisdiction all transactions or deals outside the forum? I request for forum investigator to consider this transaction as possibility.

We already join on that facebook group chat for many years while others are already there even longer than me. We share opening new campaigns and campaign payment announcements as way to notify member as part of helping each other to be notified. We even have a local group too in general in telegram that we shares the same information.

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account?  There is already blockchain evidence linking that account to the same farm, and I see that he is also your "merit buddy."

If you ask a question like this, I don't think the person in question will answer here and will probably get away with it as well. Try directly tagging RedTrust to AbuBhakar. I think that way he will answer it here.


That's why AbuBhakar has been inactive since February 28, 2026, I think their brains are going dumb for using multiple accounts to post.

So even an inactivity of other user now already have a prejudiced from you. So what’s the point of answering here. Some user have personal matters outside the forum.

This proves that it’s useless to give a defense.

A Binance deposit address, separate from the one shared by AbuBhakar and Beparanf, was shared between AbuBhakar and Wapfika bc1qyljchfh359m8slztpp2sqt92ky723wm5zshyyq

You are using an evidence of external transaction outside the forum. Like what I said above, Do we need to post here what will be our transaction if we are already directly in touch on other medium for P2P.

But to answer this, we do sometimes a consolidated P2P transfer on exchange to get a better rates since some good offer rates have high minimum amount required. There’s also some instances in the past that we don’t have the supported bank account on P2P exchange compared now that Binance listed almost all bank and neo bank.

That’s how I remember it. This also proves that we are not truly aware for the existing connection accused on our account. We will not transact to each other or join on same campaign just to maintain our connection out of the radar.

Your method of investigation is very intrusive to the spirit of Bitcoin P2P function. You are forcing user to create a receipt first here before user can transact to each other while the real essence why someone willing to do P2P transfer is due to trust built to each other meaning they knew each other very well or they are relying to reputation of the member.

Happy weekends. I will not be able to reply until Monday. I don’t have any financial gains by answering question here unlike you guys.

[Pandu Geddon]

You are using an evidence of external transaction outside the forum. Like what I said above, Do we need to post here what will be our transaction if we are already directly in touch on other medium for P2P.

Engaging in P2P transactions is everyone's right. But we are not foolish to see P2P transactions that are patterned like that clearly. You could call it a lending pattern carried out among users in your local community. But it is very unlikely that such transactions are conducted by many people. One possibility that comes to my mind is one person operating those accounts.

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account? 

For the AbuBhakar account, is it possible that the @Cointxz (Coin_trader) account also made a copy-paste mistake? Meanwhile, AbuBhakar never registered in that campaign.


https://bitlist.co/address/0x891C4519f7f8CAD0332CbB057f00af86075E16C1

[lovesmayfamilis]

This proves that it’s useless to give a defense.

You have said the main idea of this topic. And you also expressed a desire to open a new account, which you will develop independently, so that later the "sins" of the past do not reach you unexpectedly. It's better to take the time for this.

Haven't you ever visited the reputation section and seen that it's useless to prove your connection with your brother, dad, and mom? You are not the first or the last to get burned on shared transactions and connections. However, the forum is very soft on alternative accounts compared to other forums; with one IP and one browser fingerprint, you can open a lot of accounts. The main thing is not to cross paths with others, as excuses for connections with friends will not work. Didn't you realize that before?

Believe me, in those places where multi-accounts are prohibited, bans arrive without showdown and warnings. The forum is also very patient with this, but there are those who are so very lazy as not to overlap with other accounts and then accuse others of injustice. ¯\_(•_•)_/¯

[Cointxz]

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account? 

For the AbuBhakar account, is it possible that the @Cointxz (Coin_trader) account also made a copy-paste mistake? Meanwhile, AbuBhakar never registered in that campaign.


https://bitlist.co/address/0x891C4519f7f8CAD0332CbB057f00af86075E16C1

Got notified on our telegram group chat, I’m working with the said user on telegram community management and other personal marketing job on Facebook for my business.

I use a payroll wallet address sticky notes which I thought my airdrop wallet address. I never use the wallet address to received funds for that said campaign. I immediately deleted it when I notice that I don’t have private key for that specific address.

I got contract for marketing and community moderator for Kardiachain ecosystem for PH due to popularity of Axie in my country and at the same time trying to get back on translation job due to encouragement to try which I didn’t pursue further after few tries due to lack of time already plus my eye condition is already worsening. You can check if there’s similarities on our account for further investigation. Main user involved on this thread is also my translation competitor. You can check my portfolio https://docs.google.com/document/d/19UZUAPgi0tVLT6wF2pzLe42ySsN-Iwm4tSwP-_pKi04/mobilebasic how massive my translation project in the past compared to how massive this farm account too. Each translation job of whitepaper and thread will require me a lot of time just to manually translate it.

[FinneysTrueVision]

You are using an evidence of external transaction outside the forum. Like what I said above, Do we need to post here what will be our transaction if we are already directly in touch on other medium for P2P.

Engaging in P2P transactions is everyone's right. But we are not foolish to see P2P transactions that are patterned like that clearly. You could call it a lending pattern carried out among users in your local community. But it is very unlikely that such transactions are conducted by many people. One possibility that comes to my mind is one person operating those accounts.

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account?  

For the AbuBhakar account, is it possible that the @Cointxz (Coin_trader) account also made a copy-paste mistake? Meanwhile, AbuBhakar never registered in that campaign.


https://bitlist.co/address/0x891C4519f7f8CAD0332CbB057f00af86075E16C1

The excuse that they were consolidating funds for peer to peer trading doesn’t work because they were also all transferring funds to the same casino address. Duelbits is obviously not a p2p trading platform.

I was already suspecting Cointxz of being a part of this farm, but now that I see that he was applying for bounties with the same address as AbuBhakar, it becomes harder to deny that possibility. Cointxz and also dimonstration’s addresses were frequently sending funds to many of the same addresses as the ones belonging to the other farmers. Until now, Cointxz and dimonstration had not been mentioned in the thread but maybe they would care to explain their connection.

[Cointxz]

You are using an evidence of external transaction outside the forum. Like what I said above, Do we need to post here what will be our transaction if we are already directly in touch on other medium for P2P.

Engaging in P2P transactions is everyone's right. But we are not foolish to see P2P transactions that are patterned like that clearly. You could call it a lending pattern carried out among users in your local community. But it is very unlikely that such transactions are conducted by many people. One possibility that comes to my mind is one person operating those accounts.

And what can you tell us about your connection to the AbuBhakar account?  

For the AbuBhakar account, is it possible that the @Cointxz (Coin_trader) account also made a copy-paste mistake? Meanwhile, AbuBhakar never registered in that campaign.


https://bitlist.co/address/0x891C4519f7f8CAD0332CbB057f00af86075E16C1

The excuse that they were consolidating funds for peer to peer trading doesn’t work because they were also all transferring funds to the same casino address. Duelbits is obviously not a p2p trading platform.

I was already suspecting Cointxz of being a part of this farm, but now that I see that he was applying for bounties with the same address as AbuBhakar, it becomes harder to deny that possibility. Cointxz and also dimonstration’s addresses were frequently sending funds to many of the same addresses as the ones belonging to the other farmers. Until now, Cointxz and dimonstration had not been mentioned in the thread but maybe they would care to explain their connection.

I’m a P2P trader before I do consolidating transactions for the group in exchange for a fees. I’m the one who will send them Gcash after receiving.

I stop this business already after my country change administration that crack down exchange since I have business link on my accounts. I experienced too that my bank account got blocked due to this P2P business.

I experienced this kind of inconvenience with banks when they freeze my bank account containing my whole savings for more than a year just because someone I transacted via P2P have a money from a hack bank account.

I provided all the proof of my P2P transaction yet it still took them more than a year just to conclude that I’m legally acquired my money through P2P of crypto.

Banks is inconvenient especially if you have storing most of your savings. They are hard to communicate once you encounter problem with them.

I use sometimes my crypto casino address as receiver to save fees because I’m regular gambler while I send them cash via gcash. Now, I stop doing this due to possible legal implications.

All this transaction happened when I’m still free to use the P2P without legal implications.

As a P2P trader before. I can do profit by setting order with highest/cheapest price on payment method that is popular for micro transactions like Gcash since I have less competitors in there and the price is less competitive compared to the traditional bank transfers.

I do have a good daily profit back then from this micro-medium transactions. The only problem is it’s time consuming checking frequently sms notifications for pending orders.

This profitability depends on the P2P activity in your country. In my local currency, I saw lots of foreign trader especially Chinese doing P2P with our currency.

Depending on the P2P rate, I use different exchange to transact.

Now I’m the one in need of this service to transact for my casino funds because our government is already banned both exchange and casino while my business is registered under my name tied with my bank accounts.

My business thread was also deleted in the forum including archives which I requested in the past with @tryninja.



I request for change name for this specific reason that I don’t do P2P trade anymore.

[Pandu Geddon]

I use a payroll wallet address sticky notes which I thought my airdrop wallet address. I never use the wallet address to received funds for that said campaign. I immediately deleted it when I notice that I don’t have private key for that specific address.

If it were just a copy-paste mistake, it would make sense if it happened in your POA. But how could a copy-paste mistake end up in a spreadsheet? If you are accepted, maybe you want to donate the payment from that campaign?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XkheW_0KuqGoz_4-W4eLvc_uXNNKz-CBe1lsr-IJ4yQ/edit?gid=357343534#gid=357343534

[FinneysTrueVision]

I’m a P2P trader before I do consolidating transactions for the group in exchange for a fees. I’m the one who will send them Gcash after receiving.

You do have better plausible deniability than the rest of these accounts. However, this is not the first time you have been accused of using alt accounts and abusing merit. You have neutral trust from 2020 for connections to Crypto Girl. Clicking on the reference link on that feedback and following the thread further down, some more connections were found. At first you didn’t even try to say it was P2P trading and made a weak attempt at denying everything.

WOW. I don't have any idea about this one.  

The one you link is female user and I don't know why the heck she used my BTC wallet address.

When I read your posts, I see many similarities in the way each of the accounts Cointxz, Beparanf, Eternad, AbuBhakar and dimonstration writes. You all tend to break up your writing into several short paragraphs, some of them only one sentence long. This might be circumstantial, but there has been multiple things which have led me to have serious doubts, aside from all the on-chain connections.

Now that I see Crypto Girl’s profile, they were also a campaign manager and also have a similar writing style. There are just way too many coincidences. The most reasonable explanation would be that these are actually all farmed accounts owned by the same person.

[Stalker22]

I’m a P2P trader before I do consolidating transactions for the group in exchange for a fees. I’m the one who will send them Gcash after receiving.

Doing P2P trading is the oldest excuse in the book whenever someone gets caught running a cluster of closely linked accounts.  Its a highly convenient story, but you havent provided a single shred of actual evidence to back it up.

The reality is, we have seen this exact pattern of behavior play out too many times to count.  Based on the evidence right in front of us, the much more logical explanation is that you, or a tiny group of you working together, are personally operating all of these linked accounts yourself for dishonest financial gain.  Look at the blockchain data right in front of us.  We have a clear pattern of your account, alongside AbuBhakar, Eternad, dimonstration, and Beparanf, all routing funds into the exact same deposit addresses over the span of years.  The same names involved in consolidating bounty tokens to the same addresses over a decade ago and also have a history of sharing merits among themselves to build up their accounts.  And you are claiming that these are all different people and that it is all a coincidence?

And just as coincidentally, the same people somehow end up in a campaign that you manage? 

Accepted Senior Member

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=930591
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 5844
Segwit Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1q954ye9lwac5sk4mn4q2gk9vkn9jh7ejrgh3jg8
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 11

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=667946
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 1093
Segwit Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qajrjhs9xcfwqfahhfqldwr3vrzmgnzm9cue3us
EARNED merit in the last 120 days:

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=916855
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 698
Segwit Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qz5mep33t2pr45pgcfr37wcu9ktqt5psxvjecm0
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 3

Of all the people on the forum, you accept individuals into your campaign who just happen to have "private P2P deals" with you, and then they conveniently send their campaign earnings right back to your personal deposit address just to save a few cents in fees?  You see how ridiculous that sounds.