|
Simba84
|
 |
November 12, 2015, 03:22:09 PM |
|
Yes is this. My config.json is configured with my ric address: RG3r31qCD9Szciifs8jypsvn1jZcbEZF46
Stupid bug found. The block reward has been given to who first connected to the pool in a block time. Should been fixed up now. Thank you for your test again. And you could send me to the RIC: RG3r31qCD9Szciifs8jypsvn1jZcbEZF46 coins for the block I solved? Thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 12, 2015, 03:36:48 PM |
|
It seems that xpoolx.com don't accept all the shares. In the last few hours is that you connect on port 3333 or 4444 server responds with (Invalid Share: Reason null) basis of at least 5-10% of the time... It also happens to someone else  |
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
November 12, 2015, 03:50:29 PM |
|
I't is cause the job id it's outdated, new block found but not broadcasted to the miners yet. The time between the pool looks for a new block it's only 1 second.
|
|
|
|
|
asof
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2015, 04:04:36 PM |
|
And you could send me to the RIC: RG3r31qCD9Szciifs8jypsvn1jZcbEZF46 coins for the block I solved? Thank you
Have sent the 50 RIC to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 12, 2015, 04:22:28 PM |
|
I't is cause the job id it's outdated, new block found but not broadcasted to the miners yet. The time between the pool looks for a new block it's only 1 second.
Ah ok. I was used to with the xpt protocol and ypool that in response to a share sent immediately after a block change was indicated as "Share outdated" I understand  |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 12, 2015, 04:25:05 PM |
|
And you could send me to the RIC: RG3r31qCD9Szciifs8jypsvn1jZcbEZF46 coins for the block I solved? Thank you
Have sent the 50 RIC to you. Perfect thank you very much! Meanwhile, I'm also continuing testing of the miner and the connection that sometimes seems to give json refused problems |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 12, 2015, 07:33:27 PM |
|
But mining on pool solo miner is the same as doing it directly on your wallet? This explains the fact that the blocks are resolved by other users gpupool.com are not "paid" and being distributed equitably according to the share done individually, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
November 12, 2015, 07:58:31 PM |
|
But mining on pool solo miner is the same as doing it directly on your wallet? This explains the fact that the blocks are resolved by other users gpupool.com are not "paid" and being distributed equitably according to the share done individually, right?
I think he have the software like a pool but works different, the miner who solve the block gains each block. |
|
|
|
|
machineswork
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2015, 10:49:12 PM |
|
Hello everyone! I have compiled up a RieCoin generic x86-64 cpu pool solo miner. It is modified from dave-andersen's fastrie miner, it will connect to http://ric1.gpupool.com , total fee 4 RIC/block. It do not need AVX instruction set support, and the efficiency seems to be same as xpoolx.com's miner. Anybody wish to test it? Usage: Just fill your RieCoin(RIC) address into config.json, set the threads you want to use, and run RicSoloPoolMiner.exe. Please visit http://gpupool.com or download at: http://gpupool.com/RicSoloPoolMiner-b17.zipMD5 of the zip file: 7f21ac1d22184192b5078d0642fcbd91 The solo miner can't run on windows2008 64bit. work well on win7 64bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 13, 2015, 05:36:14 AM |
|
Hello everyone! I have compiled up a RieCoin generic x86-64 cpu pool solo miner. It is modified from dave-andersen's fastrie miner, it will connect to http://ric1.gpupool.com , total fee 4 RIC/block. It do not need AVX instruction set support, and the efficiency seems to be same as xpoolx.com's miner. Anybody wish to test it? Usage: Just fill your RieCoin(RIC) address into config.json, set the threads you want to use, and run RicSoloPoolMiner.exe. Please visit http://gpupool.com or download at: http://gpupool.com/RicSoloPoolMiner-b17.zipMD5 of the zip file: 7f21ac1d22184192b5078d0642fcbd91 The solo miner can't run on windows2008 64bit. work well on win7 64bit. This solo pool it's not convenient! If you not resolved the block do not get anything, the same that solo mining directly on your local wallet... Then the 8% fee ..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 13, 2015, 08:37:42 AM |
|
xpoolx seems to have problem with invalid shares. Server is delayed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
November 13, 2015, 11:25:47 AM |
|
xpoolx seems to have problem with invalid shares. Server is delayed.
Today im going to migrate the server to another system more powerfull. This weekend issues should be fixed 100% Thanks for patience. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 16, 2015, 02:22:49 AM |
|
I did some tests with different ip and xpoolx.com and often the miner does not connect to the server on any of the available ports.It can not seem to do the DNS hostname resolution and remains on "Launching xxx threads ...". Also several tests on Cloud Computing platforms give the same result. Info from the Admin?
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
November 16, 2015, 11:49:15 AM |
|
I did some tests with different ip and xpoolx.com and often the miner does not connect to the server on any of the available ports.It can not seem to do the DNS hostname resolution and remains on "Launching xxx threads ...". Also several tests on Cloud Computing platforms give the same result. Info from the Admin?
Thank you
It should be fixed now Sorry |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 16, 2015, 03:26:27 PM |
|
I did some tests with different ip and xpoolx.com and often the miner does not connect to the server on any of the available ports.It can not seem to do the DNS hostname resolution and remains on "Launching xxx threads ...". Also several tests on Cloud Computing platforms give the same result. Info from the Admin?
Thank you
It should be fixed now Sorry Problems above still present... Any news? |
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
November 16, 2015, 06:22:17 PM |
|
Can you give me your pool username? im testing the pool with different created accounts and it works fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 16, 2015, 06:49:43 PM |
|
Can you give me your pool username? im testing the pool with different created accounts and it works fine.
I tried at least four accounts. Still the same problem! I can connect with my server 178.22.70.122 and even with other accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
November 16, 2015, 10:20:53 PM |
|
Can you give me your pool username? im testing the pool with different created accounts and it works fine.
I tried at least four accounts. Still the same problem! I can connect with my server 178.22.70.122 and even with other accounts Im connecting with different ips and different accounts and i dont see any problem :\ Did you created the worker in the webpage? Auto creation of workers is disabled. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
November 17, 2015, 04:37:00 AM |
|
Can you give me your pool username? im testing the pool with different created accounts and it works fine.
I tried at least four accounts. Still the same problem! I can connect with my server 178.22.70.122 and even with other accounts Im connecting with different ips and different accounts and i dont see any problem :\ Did you created the worker in the webpage? Auto creation of workers is disabled. Of course I know how the mining pool work. In my account I have 6-7 workers and some PCs are fine, others do not connect |
|
|
|
|
fairglu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1030
|
|
November 17, 2015, 08:00:53 AM |
|
Of course I know how the mining pool work. In my account I have 6-7 workers and some PCs are fine, others do not connect
I have noticed the same thing, but I think the trouble comes from xptminer, which seems to be sensitive to some CPU or host particulars, the same binary on theoretically same Ubuntu 14 LTS works fine on some machines, fails in some and just segfaults in others. |
|
|
|
|
