[ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

[Pon13]

does the hash rate actually differs if you use xtpminer2 ?

can you select a different pool except the one it has embedded in it?

[1713484308]

1713484308

[1713484308]

1713484308

[1713484308]

1713484308

[1713484308]

1713484308

[redjedievolution]

No you can't. Its modified to only mine riepool.

You must to use dave-andersen xptminer from github, and compile it. I compiled it fine with primesieve libgmpxx and that stuff, but i couldn't for windows

Regards

does the hash rate actually differs if you use xtpminer2 ?

can you select a different pool except the one it has embedded in it?

[Pon13]

No you can't. Its modified to only mine riepool.

You must to use dave-andersen xptminer from github, and compile it. I compiled it fine with primesieve libgmpxx and that stuff, but i couldn't for windows

Regards

does the hash rate actually differs if you use xtpminer2 ?

can you select a different pool except the one it has embedded in it?

thanks for your reply. i see.
what about the hash rate difference? is the xtpminer2 like 20% better than the xtpminer?

[redjedievolution]

I don't know the performance from xptminer to xptminer2. But i tested both, xptminer2 in riepool, and xptminer in ublock. Definitely better profits in ublock. I transfered all my hashrate there.

No you can't. Its modified to only mine riepool.

You must to use dave-andersen xptminer from github, and compile it. I compiled it fine with primesieve libgmpxx and that stuff, but i couldn't for windows

Regards

does the hash rate actually differs if you use xtpminer2 ?

can you select a different pool except the one it has embedded in it?

thanks for your reply. i see.
what about the hash rate difference? is the xtpminer2 like 20% better than the xtpminer?

[simba841]

No you can't. Its modified to only mine riepool.

You must to use dave-andersen xptminer from github, and compile it. I compiled it fine with primesieve libgmpxx and that stuff, but i couldn't for windows

Regards

does the hash rate actually differs if you use xtpminer2 ?

can you select a different pool except the one it has embedded in it?

thanks for your reply. i see.
what about the hash rate difference? is the xtpminer2 like 20% better than the xtpminer?

To test the two miners, just do it for both on RiePool and appreciates xptMiner 2.2 performance. For Intel i7 and Xeon CPUs the increase in computing power exceeds 20% compared to dga-c17 with Primesieve libraries.  

For some time we are also working on a new miner for GPU but still in full phase of code writing and possible optimization. We will keep you up to date on development 

[Pon13]

i guess you are right. i m gonna test and check it myself.

thanks for your answer !

[SeksiStarlord]

people lets vote to get riecoin on altcoin.io exchange, decentralized with atomic swaps, what do you think?
https://feedback.altcoinexchange.com/suggestions/2135/add-riecoin

[Dead Things]

I don't know the performance from xptminer to xptminer2. But i tested both, xptminer2 in riepool, and xptminer in ublock. Definitely better profits in ublock. I transfered all my hashrate there.

I can 100% report the same thing - the closedsource xptminer2 on Riepool reports better hashrates than the opensource xptminer on ublock. But I did about 2 weeks on Riepool before growing frustrated that my own miners were solving blocks at a much higher rate than that at which I was getting rewarded. The difference was significant, too - not just a function of the margin of error. On ublock, even though the opensource miner reports much lower hashrates, I'm actually earning a great deal more, and my miners are getting rewarded appropriately for the number of blocks they solve. This leads me to believe that either the closedsource miner's hashrates are being artificially inflated or Riepool is suffering from too many block-withholding attacks.

[simba841]

people lets vote to get riecoin on altcoin.io exchange, decentralized with atomic swaps, what do you think?
https://feedback.altcoinexchange.com/suggestions/2135/add-riecoin

This currency needs more exchanges. It would be interesting to include Riecoin on relatively large platforms such as Bittrex, CEX.IO, YObit.

P.S. GPU RIC miner development is going forward 

[ziiip]

Hi pallas, the code was completely revisited. No old bug but if users can test it is the best thing.
At moment I don't release the source until the miner is tested hard and all is good.

Hi Simba,
Are you going back on your promise to release the source code for your miner??
Please, let us know when the amazing code is ready for release . . .assuming you've had time to test it by now . . . .
Also please don't tell me your GPU code will be closed source as well I'll conclude you have no care for the community if that's the case

[Pon13]

I don't know the performance from xptminer to xptminer2. But i tested both, xptminer2 in riepool, and xptminer in ublock. Definitely better profits in ublock. I transfered all my hashrate there.

I can 100% report the same thing - the closedsource xptminer2 on Riepool reports better hashrates than the opensource xptminer on ublock. But I did about 2 weeks on Riepool before growing frustrated that my own miners were solving blocks at a much higher rate than that at which I was getting rewarded. The difference was significant, too - not just a function of the margin of error. On ublock, even though the opensource miner reports much lower hashrates, I'm actually earning a great deal more, and my miners are getting rewarded appropriately for the number of blocks they solve. This leads me to believe that either the closedsource miner's hashrates are being artificially inflated or Riepool is suffering from too many block-withholding attacks.

i can confirm the same. i tested xtpminer2 at riepool for about two days.
despite the fact that it shows bigger hashrates the earnings are much less than ublock.it with xtpminer(1).
since it has been discussed here before i guess its because of the many block-withholding attacks.

[redjedievolution]

I didn't said xptminer2 reports better hashrates. I said exactly the opposite. So you can't report 100% the same thing.

I moved to ublock into their open source xptminer just according to better hashrate. I had 40.000khash in riepool, and around 300.000khash in ublock.
Thats a substantial grow. maybe fake, but jumped from 170 coins each day to 600 each day

Regards

I don't know the performance from xptminer to xptminer2. But i tested both, xptminer2 in riepool, and xptminer in ublock. Definitely better profits in ublock. I transfered all my hashrate there.

I can 100% report the same thing - the closedsource xptminer2 on Riepool reports better hashrates than the opensource xptminer on ublock. But I did about 2 weeks on Riepool before growing frustrated that my own miners were solving blocks at a much higher rate than that at which I was getting rewarded. The difference was significant, too - not just a function of the margin of error. On ublock, even though the opensource miner reports much lower hashrates, I'm actually earning a great deal more, and my miners are getting rewarded appropriately for the number of blocks they solve. This leads me to believe that either the closedsource miner's hashrates are being artificially inflated or Riepool is suffering from too many block-withholding attacks.

[simba841]

I didn't said xptminer2 reports better hashrates. I said exactly the opposite. So you can't report 100% the same thing.

I moved to ublock into their open source xptminer just according to better hashrate. I had 40.000khash in riepool, and around 300.000khash in ublock.
Thats a substantial grow. maybe fake, but jumped from 170 coins each day to 600 each day

Regards

Once and for all.... To effectively test multiple pools you need to have at least one month's test for each, so you will avoid the data being distorted by the marked fluctuation of the mining power on the pool and of the difficulty of the PoW itself.

for ziiip: Probably, towards the issue of code writing and the first tests, we will consider releasing the sources code, so you can give us a hand in the corrections of the case. We hope the performances are high (so it seems) and that in this way Riecoin can embrace more users than mine with the GPUs. Stay tuned  

[redjedievolution]

I understand  if i was receiving 190 coins each day or even 200 250 with ublock. In this case i understand i need more days to have a better opinion.

But when you earn around 600 coins each day in ublock, and around 170 in riepool.... the facts are the facts

I didn't said xptminer2 reports better hashrates. I said exactly the opposite. So you can't report 100% the same thing.

I moved to ublock into their open source xptminer just according to better hashrate. I had 40.000khash in riepool, and around 300.000khash in ublock.
Thats a substantial grow. maybe fake, but jumped from 170 coins each day to 600 each day

Regards

Once and for all.... To effectively test multiple pools you need to have at least one month's test for each, so you will avoid the data being distorted by the marked fluctuation of the mining power on the pool and of the difficulty of the PoW itself.

for ziiip: Probably, towards the issue of code writing and the first tests, we will consider releasing the sources code, so you can give us a hand in the corrections of the case. We hope the performances are high (so it seems) and that in this way Riecoin can embrace more users than mine with the GPUs. Stay tuned  

[simba841]

red... But you said in a previous post to use more mining power on uBlock than you used on RiePool. Also this is a fact... Then, anyway, each one is free of mining as he thinks more appropriate, we have always said this. Even if Solo miners could help the pools.....

[Dead Things]

I moved to ublock into their open source xptminer just according to better hashrate. I had 40.000khash in riepool, and around 300.000khash in ublock.
Thats a substantial grow. maybe fake, but jumped from 170 coins each day to 600 each day

lol - well, clearly then you were doing something wrong.

And forget hashrate anyway. There's no good way to measure hash with riecoin.

[redjedievolution]

Yes, i increased around 40% 50%

But do the maths.
From around 170 180 coins to 600 coins... It isn't a 40% 50% increase. Its around 200% 250% increase.

I must get around 300 coins in ublock. But i get 600 each day!!!!!!!!!!!


 

red... But you said in a previous post to use more mining power on uBlock than you used on RiePool. Also this is a fact... Then, anyway, each one is free of mining as he thinks more appropriate, we have always said this. Even if Solo miners could help the pools.....

[Dead Things]

That sounds like some pretty serious horsepower you've got running there red. Mind if I ask you what your rigs are?

[redjedievolution]

Not too much, im only using one core of each processor. 

That sounds like some pretty serious horsepower you've got running there red. Mind if I ask you what your rigs are?

[Dead Things]

I take your meaning!