Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 05:39:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... 311 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record  (Read 684919 times)
CremeFraiche
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 03:47:30 PM
 #2521

running b11-version on 3 windows machines for 24 hours now without problems (ypool)

1713505162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713505162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713505162
Reply with quote  #2

1713505162
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2014, 04:54:34 PM
 #2522

Ahh, thanks for the very helpful debug output.

I've updated the miner to b12 and committed into the repository.

b12 fixes a known bug with not regenerating the nonce time frequently enough for ypool.  The miner now resets its time nonce every minute instead of every block.

This slows down the miner a bit.  Sorry - but it should compensate by not having invalid shares as often.  You might find that reducing -s slightly helps.

But there may still be lingering buts causing this "not a valid prime" error.  I'm going to keep digging, and will work on getting some of that speed back in b13.

  -Dave

Are people seeing this on Linux also?

yes.

Code:
2014-03-23 08:58:23.532409175 [07:39:52] Share found! (Blockheight: 24610)
2014-03-23 08:58:25.432824705 [07:39:54] 2ch/s: 30.3795 3ch/s: 1.9480 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 532 / 511
2014-03-23 08:58:33.432838812 [07:40:02] 2ch/s: 30.3808 3ch/s: 1.9483 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 532 / 511
2014-03-23 08:58:34.672120815 [07:40:03] Share found! (Blockheight: 24610)
2014-03-23 08:58:41.434825115 [07:40:10] 2ch/s: 30.3809 3ch/s: 1.9485 4ch/s: 0.0682 Shares total: 533 / 512
2014-03-23 08:58:49.435824174 [07:40:18] 2ch/s: 30.3814 3ch/s: 1.9489 4ch/s: 0.0682 Shares total: 533 / 512
2014-03-23 08:58:56.817584732 [07:40:25] Share found! (Blockheight: 24610)
2014-03-23 08:58:57.435830082 [07:40:26] 2ch/s: 30.3820 3ch/s: 1.9490 4ch/s: 0.0684 Shares total: 534 / 513
2014-03-23 08:58:57.751832129 Invalid share
2014-03-23 08:58:57.751847632 Reason: CheckProofOfWork() : not valid pow
2014-03-23 08:59:05.435828594 [07:40:34] 2ch/s: 30.3828 3ch/s: 1.9487 4ch/s: 0.0683 Shares total: 534 / 512
... no new shares found till I restarted the process
2014-03-23 09:01:21.381338929 [07:42:50] Share found! (Blockheight: 24612)
2014-03-23 09:01:21.450835838 [07:42:50] 2ch/s: 30.3662 3ch/s: 1.9490 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 535 / 513
2014-03-23 09:01:22.209827519 Invalid share
2014-03-23 09:01:22.209846968 Reason: CheckProofOfWork() : n not prime
2014-03-23 09:01:29.450829867 [07:42:58] 2ch/s: 30.3649 3ch/s: 1.9488 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 535 / 512
2014-03-23 09:01:31.656831570 Ping 656.0ms (Average 912.0)
2014-03-23 09:01:37.451826894 [07:43:06] 2ch/s: 30.3659 3ch/s: 1.9492 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 535 / 512
2014-03-23 09:01:45.453825500 [07:43:14] 2ch/s: 30.3656 3ch/s: 1.9491 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 535 / 512
2014-03-23 09:01:53.455857748 [07:43:22] 2ch/s: 30.3648 3ch/s: 1.9488 4ch/s: 0.0681 Shares total: 535 / 512
2014-03-23 09:02:01.073502585 [07:43:30] Share found! (Blockheight: 24612)
2014-03-23 09:02:01.289827815 Invalid share
2014-03-23 09:02:01.289841922 Reason: CheckProofOfWork() : n not prime
...
2014-03-23 09:24:07.587949574 Reason: CheckProofOfWork() : n not prime
2014-03-23 09:24:09.612825465 [08:05:38] 2ch/s: 30.2689 3ch/s: 1.9400 4ch/s: 0.0685 Shares total: 560 / 512

restarted, all works ok:

2014-03-23 09:25:18.179824577 [00:00:56] 2ch/s: 23.3326 3ch/s: 1.0971 4ch/s: 0.0000 Shares total: 0 / 0
2014-03-23 09:25:18.686221800 [00:00:56] Share found! (Blockheight: 24628)
2014-03-23 09:25:26.179830232 [00:01:04] 2ch/s: 24.1280 3ch/s: 1.2160 4ch/s: 0.0640 Shares total: 1 / 1


goodluck0319
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 23, 2014, 05:05:56 PM
 #2523

I am wondering if u can fix the windows leak problem on ur miner. does b12 fix the "invalid share, not a valid prime and Reason: CheckProofOfWork() : not valid pow problem?
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 06:06:30 PM
 #2524

How are you all using the avx2 version?

I downloaded it and it is just a file and not a program like the sse4 version.

If it needs compiled does anyone have a compiled version for windows?

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
Aboroth
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 06:20:30 PM
 #2525

How are you all using the avx2 version?

I downloaded it and it is just a file and not a program like the sse4 version.

If it needs compiled does anyone have a compiled version for windows?

I think the avx2 version is Linux only.
surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 06:41:41 PM
 #2526

How are you all using the avx2 version?

I downloaded it and it is just a file and not a program like the sse4 version.

If it needs compiled does anyone have a compiled version for windows?
It's a linux executable program.

The names of Windows programs always end in .exe
Linux programs usually do not have a file type ending.
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 06:48:20 PM
 #2527

@ aboroth and surfer43

Thanks.

I need to learn how to compile.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
kobol21
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 09:17:27 PM
 #2528

Hey guys, where can I see RIECOIN difficulty chart ?! Cant find it anywhere!
istudy92
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 23, 2014, 11:05:34 PM
 #2529

Hey guys, where can I see RIECOIN difficulty chart ?! Cant find it anywhere!


http://da-data.blogspot.com/?view=classic
dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
March 24, 2014, 12:33:59 AM
Last edit: March 24, 2014, 12:46:37 AM by dga
 #2530

The ypool chat room was full of people noticing that b12 slowed down too much, so I've pushed b13 as a compromise between safety and speed.  But it also includes an important bug fix (which should be masked by the other one, but fixing bugs is good).

 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/
and in github:
 https://github.com/dave-andersen/fastrie/

Also, there's now a ChangeLog that covers all of this stuff:  https://github.com/dave-andersen/fastrie/blob/master/ChangeLog

It may be slightly slower than b11 when a block takes a long time, but it's not too far off.  It might even be a little faster for fast blocks, but overall, it's probably 5% slower than b11, but it won't get into the "invalid prime" problem.

There were two bugs in b11:
  - If it went too long before a new block was found, it could overflow the 256 bit riecoin nonce field -- I changed some constants and didn't re-do the math on them.  This is now computed based upon those constants, so the bug shouldn't reappear.

  - It could run for too long without updating its block time field, which would cause ypool to reject it even if it contained a valid share or block.  I've mostly kinda sorta fixed this, but the current version reflects a compromise between safety (updating the time field frequently) and efficiency (running as long as possible after computing a target).  This one's a "let's run it and see how it does" kind of thing.

For people who like to read the source of these things, the internals have gotten a little cleaner, which hopefully makes the logic a bit more clear.  In particular, I think the offset computation should be easier to read and understand now, for those seeking to understand what makes these miners tick.

  -Dave

goodluck0319
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 12:37:24 AM
 #2531

so what does b13 fix?
dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
March 24, 2014, 01:21:25 AM
 #2532

so what does b13 fix?

The most important fix is that it addresses the lack of a changelog to answer questions like this. Smiley

https://github.com/dave-andersen/fastrie/blob/master/ChangeLog

(I suppose the changelog should include that b13 includes a changelog. :-)

istudy92
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 04:40:27 AM
 #2533

MY PC uses like 5.1GB memory with this miner, is this normal?
one4many
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 516
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 04:44:23 AM
 #2534

MY PC uses like 5.1GB memory with this miner, is this normal?

Seems to be normal on machine with several cores.
Here is the mem usage on one of my systems:
Code:
  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                                                                                                                             
 3104 root      20   0 31.5g  28g 1052 S 4810.3 74.4  28803:26 xptminer-sse4-b                                                                                                                   

Is yours an 8 core machine?

    one4many
istudy92
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 04:50:58 AM
 #2535

Well I know on my Win 7 I have a 8 core 8320, it uses 5.1 gb.

On my 4p 64 core ubunto it would crash and had to limit the mem to 4gb per processor, it REALLY wants more and more.  I am not sure if giving it more would benifit the miner?  So in general I have allocated a total of 15.7 GB to the 4p opposed to the 21gb it sorta wants.
northranger79510
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250

Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 05:25:14 AM
 #2536

Quick Update: RiecoinFoundation.org will be ready by next Monday

Huntercoin: H9kttkrQidiQMG9NibmTgjgCKqWJMAkAXD
Riecoin: Like us on https://www.facebook.com/TheRiecoinCommunity
dogaatac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 306


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 06:20:25 AM
 #2537

the price is killing me Sad
relm9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 24, 2014, 06:36:04 AM
 #2538

The ypool chat room was full of people noticing that b12 slowed down too much, so I've pushed b13 as a compromise between safety and speed.  But it also includes an important bug fix (which should be masked by the other one, but fixing bugs is good).

 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/
and in github:
 https://github.com/dave-andersen/fastrie/

Also, there's now a ChangeLog that covers all of this stuff:  https://github.com/dave-andersen/fastrie/blob/master/ChangeLog

It may be slightly slower than b11 when a block takes a long time, but it's not too far off.  It might even be a little faster for fast blocks, but overall, it's probably 5% slower than b11, but it won't get into the "invalid prime" problem.

There were two bugs in b11:
  - If it went too long before a new block was found, it could overflow the 256 bit riecoin nonce field -- I changed some constants and didn't re-do the math on them.  This is now computed based upon those constants, so the bug shouldn't reappear.

  - It could run for too long without updating its block time field, which would cause ypool to reject it even if it contained a valid share or block.  I've mostly kinda sorta fixed this, but the current version reflects a compromise between safety (updating the time field frequently) and efficiency (running as long as possible after computing a target).  This one's a "let's run it and see how it does" kind of thing.

For people who like to read the source of these things, the internals have gotten a little cleaner, which hopefully makes the logic a bit more clear.  In particular, I think the offset computation should be easier to read and understand now, for those seeking to understand what makes these miners tick.

  -Dave

For some reason, when starting this up on my server it hangs after the "Launching miner..." and just exits. I'm on CentOS 6.4 and had to compile against custom built gmp as the one CentOS had was outdated. No errors or anything though. I also tried your prebuilt binaries, same thing.
JohnnyCrypto
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 09:08:21 AM
 #2539

Memory usage is related to the sieve size (-s), and by the amount of cores your CPU has, or threads you use. Default sieve size is -s 500000000. If you find it is using too much memory, or freezes or crashes upon running the program, just decrease the sieve amount to a lower size. If you have more memory you might want to increase it, it may help performance. For reference i'm using -s 675000000 for the 8 core i7, which uses about 6.5 GB of RAM. On other systems with 4 core i5's i can use -s 900000000 which uses about 6 GB.


https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/readme.html
gpools
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 24, 2014, 12:56:25 PM
 #2540

Why price riecoin down  Huh
Pages: « 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... 311 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!