Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 03:40:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: South China Sea Conflict: What should be done? What could be done?  (Read 119 times)
ConquerGold (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2018, 07:09:58 AM
Last edit: June 15, 2018, 09:30:02 AM by ConquerGold
 #1

Forum rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0
Board Rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3357782.msg35165306#msg35165306

News headline: China carries out missile drills in South China Sea amid heightened tensions
Quote
The United States and China have frequently sparred over who is militarizing the South China Sea, with Beijing blaming tensions on actions such as the “freedom of navigation” operations carried out by the U.S. navy.
Quote
China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines all have competing claims in the South China Sea.
(Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-southchinasea/china-carries-out-missile-drills-in-south-china-sea-amid-heightened-tensions-idUSKBN1JB0BX)
In summary, US exercising "freedom of navigation" and China’s missile drills result in tensions between the two of them.
Should US really be interfering in this manner? Is there any possible way to resolve the issue on militarization in the disputed territories?

China has effective militarization on South China sea, while Vietnam occupies the most number of islands. Is there a way for the countries involved to resolve the issue peacefully by themselves?
(https://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea/) Realistic answers please.
1713973254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713973254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713973254
Reply with quote  #2

1713973254
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713973254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713973254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713973254
Reply with quote  #2

1713973254
Report to moderator
Sithara007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3178
Merit: 1344


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
June 15, 2018, 08:58:37 AM
 #2

I remember a similar thread which was created a few years back. We debated for many months, and in the end the thread died without any solid solution to the issue. IMO, the only solution that is going to be acceptable to all is a decision by the UN. But it needs to be seen whether the Chinese will accept it.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..





AVATAR & PERSONAL TEXT



Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform




Feel free to drop your doubts bellow
Report to moderator 
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦       ▬▬▬ ▬          Stake.com     /     Play Smarter          ▬ ▬▬▬       ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
L E A D I N G   C R Y P T O  C A S I N O   &   S P O R T S   B E T T I N G
 
 Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Strongkored
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1061




View Profile Personal Message (Online)
Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Ignore
   
Re: [OPEN]Stake.com NEW SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN l NEW PAYRATES l HERO & LEG ONLY
May 31, 2022, 08:28:59 AM
Reply with quote  +Merit  #2
Bitcointalk Username: strongkored
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=640554
Post Count: 5040
Forum Rank: Legendary
Are you able to wear our Signature, Avatar & Personal Text? will wear upon receipt
Stake
ConquerGold (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2018, 09:49:32 AM
 #3

I remember a similar thread which was created a few years back. We debated for many months, and in the end the thread died without any solid solution to the issue. IMO, the only solution that is going to be acceptable to all is a decision by the UN. But it needs to be seen whether the Chinese will accept it.
Here is a copy of the "Award in the 'South China Sea Arbitration- PCA-CPA" though I don't suggest reading it since its 479 pages:
https://pca-cpa.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/175/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Award.pdf

In summary, the disputed reefs are not classified as habitable, the seas are considered as traditional fishing grounds. All surrounding countries have the right to fish there peacefully(supposedly). Militarization was illegal(but they didn't say that it should be removed) and there should be no harassment on fishermen there(but in some news, there is). The award itself has no teeth.

The problem arises whenever there is military action happening, on either US, China, (or Vietnam), they are considerably the most active there in terms of "freedom of navigation" and military activities, as said in the article.
CrimsonSunset
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 07:04:35 AM
 #4

I remember a similar thread which was created a few years back. We debated for many months, and in the end the thread died without any solid solution to the issue. IMO, the only solution that is going to be acceptable to all is a decision by the UN. But it needs to be seen whether the Chinese will accept it.
There is no solid solution to the issue but only for them to resolve it by themselves. UN or any other country not related intervening could worsen the situation. I hope some big group would help stop the activities which destroys  and scars those reefs.
merchantofzeny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 279



View Profile
June 17, 2018, 06:10:24 PM
 #5

Not much at this point. You can't expect China to leave those shallow reefs that they filled with sand to turn into naval bases. Save something catastrophic like a tsunami hitting those, they're staying.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298


View Profile
June 25, 2018, 02:34:01 AM
 #6

This is largely a dispute over influence and control over SE Asia, and trade in the area. If China controls the international waters in the area, they can effectively control trade with countries that are not named 'China'.
KingScorpio
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 325



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2018, 03:20:23 AM
 #7

Forum rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0
Board Rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3357782.msg35165306#msg35165306

News headline: China carries out missile drills in South China Sea amid heightened tensions
Quote
The United States and China have frequently sparred over who is militarizing the South China Sea, with Beijing blaming tensions on actions such as the “freedom of navigation” operations carried out by the U.S. navy.
Quote
China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines all have competing claims in the South China Sea.
(Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-southchinasea/china-carries-out-missile-drills-in-south-china-sea-amid-heightened-tensions-idUSKBN1JB0BX)
In summary, US exercising "freedom of navigation" and China’s missile drills result in tensions between the two of them.
Should US really be interfering in this manner? Is there any possible way to resolve the issue on militarization in the disputed territories?

China has effective militarization on South China sea, while Vietnam occupies the most number of islands. Is there a way for the countries involved to resolve the issue peacefully by themselves?
(https://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea/) Realistic answers please.

issue is formalists communist style enterpreneurship in china, the huge state companies life like they have a wall in their heads, they cant just extract ressources they are also very paranoid, it will in the end also damage severely communist chinas foreign enterpreneurship and will have to mutate towards an enterpreneurship like its being executed in the west.

regards

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!