Gleb Gamow account was sold Proof

[TryNinja]

If this is not the case, how come the message still hasn't been reported to a moderator so it could be verified?

It was. But in the other thread (which messed up everything).

Op sent me the PM so I can confirm that's real at least.

Gleb verified himself after the PM in OP. Thus I'd say it's reasonable to assume they are still in control of their account.

I don't think he is. Whoever bought the account probably just asked him to send some proof to get out of the mess. Either way I don't really trust Gleb.

[1714107970]

1714107970

[1714107970]

1714107970

[1714107970]

1714107970

[digaran]

@Gleb, please don't kill yourself man, world doesn't end here and now, I'm sure that we all could find a way to forgive you if you just honestly tell us the truth about the actual buyer. just tell us please and I will do whatever in my power to help you out.

[Gleb Gamow]

@Gleb, please don't kill yourself man, world doesn't end here and now, I'm sure that we all could find a way to forgive you if you just honestly tell us the truth about the actual buyer. just tell us please and I will do whatever in my power to help you out.

Seriously, dude, there's no real buyer. Please don't make me call Trump for a pardon. 

[Gleb Gamow]

I haven't really paid any attention or crossed many paths with Gleb Gamow, but given the recent debacle related to his account, I developed a theory that was touched upon by @hilariousetc: that as part of the sale of this account, Gleb Gamow would provide proof anytime the validity of the account was questioned.

After reading this thread, however, this theory is starting to make less and less sense, unless the new owner of the account specifically asked Gleb to log in to clarify and address any doubts or suspicions.

As someone who knows how to use Photoshop and the "Inspect Element" tool in mozilla-based browsers, my first instinct to the screenshot that was provided by OP was that the text on-screen was customized (via inspector) before the screenshot was taken. If this is not the case, how come the message still hasn't been reported to a moderator so it could be verified?

Either way, I find this whole scenario highly amusing, so thanks for the entertainment. I honestly can't wait to see what outcome there is, if there even will be at all  

EDIT: nvm about the verification by hilariousandco, I just discovered the other thread.

That image with me holding my cell phone depicting its phone number was uploaded quickly, thus no time to edit such even if I knew how to accomplish said feat on a phone. The following is the extent of my Photoshoping skills via the Inspect thingy ...

[BTCforJoe]

Dude, although we haven't crossed paths much, I will say that I've crossed your path enough to think that it's strange as fuck to see your posts with a paid signature underneath them and a paid personal message to the side... Just sayin'

[Gleb Gamow]

Dude, although we haven't crossed paths much, I will say that I've crossed your path enough to think that it's strange as fuck to see your posts with a paid signature underneath them and a paid personal message to the side... Just sayin'

Apologies for it being strange as fuck in trying to earn a couple bucks with the sig below after 100% declining ALL tips throughout the years offered to me in looking out for the community. As for the paid personal message on the side, dude, that's my entity. Fuck me! Is it okay for me to pay myself by endorsing my entity on the side or in the sig - which BTW I've done in the past - on this forum?

Let's say for sake of argument I'm between a rock and hard place. If so, is there any way possible you guys can kick me in my balls harder?

[suchmoon]

Let's say for sake of argument I'm between a rock and hard place. If so, is there any way possible you guys can kick me in my balls harder?

Can you post a picture? 

No, seriously, don't.

If you happen to see YuTü.Co.in please tell him to check his messages. Thx.

[Gleb Gamow]

Let's say for sake of argument I'm between a rock and hard place. If so, is there any way possible you guys can kick me in my balls harder?

Can you post a picture? 

No, seriously, don't.

If you happen to see YuTü.Co.in please tell him to check his messages. Thx.

Already on it, bud. I'm now Mick Fleetwood.  (with sigs removed)

Bruno

[suchmoon]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg40211050#msg40211050

[YuTü.Co.in]

Gleb Gamow account has been sold or the owner has attempted to sell. This account should have negative trust.  It's no coincidence this user has recently joined a paid signature campaign. I waited awhile for the account user to come clean but since he didn't I am posting the proof.

Not sure what you mean by come clean, but I am curious as to why you're not tagged yet for trying to purchase accounts.

Meanwhile, I went from green trust to red trust in a matter of hours after being accused of selling the Gleb account which wasn't sold, but is now in another's hands.

[Crypto_Sassy]

just wondering, if Hilariousandco can see the PM of  the user, then he can find from the AGLD pms, who bought this account?
Who are  the potential buyers of this account.
Should not we publish and red tag all the potential buyers of  this account, including OP?

[dbshck]

just wondering, if Hilariousandco can see the PM of  the user, then he can find from the AGLD pms, who bought this account?
Who are  the potential buyers of this account.
Should not we publish and red tag all the potential buyers of  this account, including OP?

AFAIK global mod can only see reported PM. theymos is the only person who's able to see all PMs.

[YuTü.Co.in]

just wondering, if Hilariousandco can see the PM of  the user, then he can find from the AGLD pms, who bought this account?
Who are  the potential buyers of this account.
Should not we publish and red tag all the potential buyers of  this account, including OP?

Whatever, dude.

Meanwhile, can I get some of my green trust back, for I've graduated from scambuster to thwarting an assignation attempt on the President of the United States by a user on this forum --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=317658.msg40216428#msg40216428 (read and follow the link to Meta).

Fuckin amazing that I went from the FBI used to call me for help pertaining to the blockchain before they developed a script to do what I used to do for free in outing out scammers, to earning green trust, to today having that turn red for something I didn't do, to now most likely having a Secret Service agent give me a call. I think it's time for bed, for it's been a long fuckin day.

Bruno

[hilariousetc]

Gleb Gamow account has been sold or the owner has attempted to sell. This account should have negative trust.  It's no coincidence this user has recently joined a paid signature campaign. I waited awhile for the account user to come clean but since he didn't I am posting the proof.

You still haven't explained this (though I guess there's nothing to explain as everyone can see what went on). Despite your protestations, you tried to sell the account, all the account's details then changed, you staked a new bitcoin address, then for the first time in your history here you try join the highest paid signature campaign on the forum.

I have no plans whatsoever in participating in any form of shady shit, bud ... unless it's with goat shit under a giant elm tree (read: in the shade).

You look and sound like good ol' Bruno, which is good enough for me.

He still sounds like someone pretending to be Bruno to me. Any long-time member knows how he acts around here and anyone who's at least half-intelligent could probably parody him successfully to some degree, though I admit he's doing a pretty good job, but something just seems off. Language is still a little different and out of the ordinary for me. Just seems like someone trying too hard to be him.

If Bruno and the hypothetical buyer are in cahoots then it's impossible to verify the ownership of the account in any conceivable way. Same applies to any account. So we are basically trying to come up with probabilities.

Well that's certainly why the feedback should stay, but I think it's safe to say the account did change hands and the proof is there that he at least tried to sell it so that warrants the feedback alone.

I know I brought up the QS conspiracy theory but I think the probability of that one is quite low.

I have no reason to believe QS does have it, but somebody does (or did).

[InvoKing]

Posting this mainly to keep following the topic
+
Can't theymos or Cyrus check the ip addresses? all the previous pms? Find a link between the reported accounts? It is better than speculating whether the account changed hands or not after being already tagged.
(and btw why is Phinnaeus Gage asleep from a +year?)

[hilariousandco]

They can, but they rarely get involved in these matters. Changing IPs isn't always conclusive proof either.

[suchmoon]

I know I brought up the QS conspiracy theory but I think the probability of that one is quite low.

I have no reason to believe QS does have it, but somebody does (or did).

That somebody right now is me and I'm quite confident I was dealing with Bruno:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg40211259#msg40211259

So from my point of view the timeline is this:

1) Bruno needs money, makes the ill-conceived decision to sell the Gleb Gamow account.
2) Some sales action takes place, including PMs, but I don't believe the account changes hands.
2a) I can't explain the changes in posting style though Bruno is known for elaborate trollery so...
3) Unable to sell the account Bruno enrolls in a sig campaign to make money.
4) PMs get published, Bruno gets red-tagged and loses campaign revenue.
5) I make an offer to prevent the account from falling into malicious hands should Bruno decide to sell it again.
6) Bruno takes me up on my offer and now I temporarily control the account. When/if Bruno gets it back I will state so publicly.

Even if I'm wrong about some part of this, the fact is the account is in my hands. I'm fully aware of the irony given my stance against account sales and sockpuppetry and the aforementioned impossibility of proving account ownership but I've already stated I won't be using it for anything so it will be really easy to see if I'm telling the truth or not.

Hopefully this puts an end to the drama. Given the circumstances it seemed to me like the best way out. I would appreciate if you could remove neg trust as I don't believe Bruno deserves it but that's really up to you.

[digaran]

I know I brought up the QS conspiracy theory but I think the probability of that one is quite low.

I have no reason to believe QS does have it, but somebody does (or did).

That somebody right now is me and I'm quite confident I was dealing with Bruno:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg40211259#msg40211259

So from my point of view the timeline is this:

1) Bruno needs money, makes the ill-conceived decision to sell the Gleb Gamow account.
2) Some sales action takes place, including PMs, but I don't believe the account changes hands.
2a) I can't explain the changes in posting style though Bruno is known for elaborate trollery so...
3) Unable to sell the account Bruno enrolls in a sig campaign to make money.
4) PMs get published, Bruno gets red-tagged and loses campaign revenue.
5) I make an offer to prevent the account from falling into malicious hands should Bruno decide to sell it again.
6) Bruno takes me up on my offer and now I temporarily control the account. When/if Bruno gets it back I will state so publicly.

Even if I'm wrong about some part of this, the fact is the account is in my hands. I'm fully aware of the irony given my stance against account sales and sockpuppetry and the aforementioned impossibility of proving account ownership but I've already stated I won't be using it for anything so it will be really easy to see if I'm telling the truth or not.

Hopefully this puts an end to the drama. Given the circumstances it seemed to me like the best way out. I would appreciate if you could remove neg trust as I don't believe Bruno deserves it but that's really up to you.

Quoting for future reference. so you bought an account and now expecting the red tags to be removed just because you bought the account?
Tagged.

[suchmoon]

Quoting for future reference. so you bought an account and now expecting the red tags to be removed just because you bought the account?
Tagged.

I don't particularly care either way. You missed the part where I said I'm not going to use the account and Bruno may get it back at some point so it doesn't make any difference to me though it probably does for Bruno. But if you want to keep lying and creating your own reality - be my guest

[jackg]

That somebody right now is me and I'm quite confident I was dealing with Bruno:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg40211259#msg40211259

So from my point of view the timeline is this:

1) Bruno needs money, makes the ill-conceived decision to sell the Gleb Gamow account.
2) Some sales action takes place, including PMs, but I don't believe the account changes hands.
2a) I can't explain the changes in posting style though Bruno is known for elaborate trollery so...
3) Unable to sell the account Bruno enrolls in a sig campaign to make money.
4) PMs get published, Bruno gets red-tagged and loses campaign revenue.
5) I make an offer to prevent the account from falling into malicious hands should Bruno decide to sell it again.
6) Bruno takes me up on my offer and now I temporarily control the account. When/if Bruno gets it back I will state so publicly.

Even if I'm wrong about some part of this, the fact is the account is in my hands. I'm fully aware of the irony given my stance against account sales and sockpuppetry and the aforementioned impossibility of proving account ownership but I've already stated I won't be using it for anything so it will be really easy to see if I'm telling the truth or not.

Hopefully this puts an end to the drama. Given the circumstances it seemed to me like the best way out. I would appreciate if you could remove neg trust as I don't believe Bruno deserves it but that's really up to you.

How much did you give him for it if you're happy saying?

Also this is kinda sad that all these users accounts are changing hands since the time I've been here. It'd be nice if more people would just hold onto their accounts but sure, If people need the money then they can sell. Although, this is one of the more notable members so hopefully Bruno gets posession of his account once again!

I'm also curious as to whether this was because of the loan request he made in October/November (for 2BTC) or whether it's for something else he needed the money for, though I think that's a bit too intrusive. I'm not sure that loan request ever got filled, I knew that he didn't want to give the Gleb account then so something must really have hit him hard.

I'd also suggest that the negative tags on the Gleb account get changed to neutral and that they read that the account has been changed to be owned by Suchmoon.
@Suchmoon, could you sign a message from a staked address from your suchmoon account to show that you own it?