Are bounty managers to be blamed?

[actimelfortelun]

Perhaps Yes, it all depends on the situation . Manager bounty is exactly the same as we are, working for the highest award received from the project

[1713865380]

1713865380

[Omparkash72]

You cannot directly blame to bounty manager for scam. As far as my knowledge bounty manager is not the part of the project team he is just a mediator between company and the bounty hunters. His responsibility is only to check bounty hunter work and give them stakes as per company norms and also update any quirey of bounty hunter.in others wards you can say employee , how can he is responsible for blame. So it is bounty hunter responsibility to check everything before joining.

[JelganNa]

Sooner or later extraordinary individuals will be fault for defaults in icos running from the group behind the venture up-to the abundance administrators. In spite of the fact that at the main idea the chiefs are to be faulted however it can likewise be shared among the distinctive individuals behind it. By the day's end their obligation is to lead, direct and co-ordinate the abundance so it is as yet their blame.

[xminer2014]

To a certain extent, a lot of them seem to be obvious scams. They should get paid in tokens the same way the rest of us are.

[ejhayehm]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

I don't know about Uchit and also don't want to research about it now. But I think if the manager had apologized, it couldn't be a scam.
There are many reason that make you cannot receive you reward, such as the project failed or it didn't reach the softcap. And these reasons are legal

[Bolyutim]

for me abundance supervisor shouldn't be fault on this if the bm are as yet dynamic and moving toward each and every inquiry on what occurred on the venture you ought to be all the more precising on this.. since this bm is likewise similar to abundance seekers that need to procure some benefit moreover. you should revile the group who extremely really working the ICO. on the off chance that that is happened you will figure out how to be more watchful on what task will you joined straightaway..

[Catstevens19]

Some bounty managers do not do their job correctly , updating the sheets or trying to find the scammers and so on, I saw many times some other people were using my articles as theirs, and I have reported this to the bounty managers, but they must do this immediately theirselves, what if I do not catch them and then lose my stakes

[MargoGolova]

Of course not . The Manager can be as cheated as we are . In addition , there is a big difference if the Manager disappears and does not answer questions or simply apologizes that the project could not pay for one reason or another .This is a very important difference

[Kaller]

The managers are really not to blame because like you and me, they are just trying to earn some money too. They are going by what the creators of the projects give them and with that if the creators do not provide the coins for them to pay out the bounty rewards then there is nothing that the bounty managers can do about it. We need to cut them some slack, it is not their fault

[GulpoRu]

I don't believe that the directors of abundance battles are at fault for the way that the undertaking was a Scam. Maybe the Manager was given enough time and assets was committed to the choice of the abundance crusades. Be that as it may, regularly chiefs likewise take part in the abundance battle, wear a mark and furthermore turn into a casualty of duplicity. Abundance members and administrators must be on a similar side.

[dreico]

they have nothing to blame because they have to set tasks that they have to fulfill and they do them, they can also be deceived by employers

[ravinesolz]

The managers are really not to blame because like you and me, they are just trying to earn some money too. They are going by what the creators of the projects give them and with that if the creators do not provide the coins for them to pay out the bounty rewards then there is nothing that the bounty managers can do about it. We need to cut them some slack, it is not their fault

Sometimes the managers don't do their job, if they don't count stakes then it's their fault for not helping.

[Ndubades]

You've said it all. They are to be blamed because they are a representative of the ICO project team. They get paid, at least to an extent, even before the campaign starts. They should take responsibility for any failed projects.

[kimjenglot]

they have nothing to blame because they have to set tasks that they have to fulfill and they do them, they can also be deceived by employers

all the work will have risks, including the bounty manager, if the distribution problem is not done, the bounty manager is also blamed by the participants, even though the Dev has not sent it to the bounty manager

[faceoff97]

Not entirely, because if you were to put your shoes to the bounty manager of the said campaign. You will notice that he is just starting his bounty managing career and most probably offered a low payment for the bounty of Uchit. Most ICOs takes advantage of this new camp managers because they will save a lot of money for the advertisement of their project.

Bounty hunters should also be held responsible for their mistakes trusting such campaigns without prior research.

[mihtju]

Bounty hunters are accused of all possible problems, but in fact we are only the lowest link in this chain. Many managers of bounty companies are not guilty of the fact that they are bounty companies that are fraudulent, but there are managers who do not care about it and that such managers I would give a negative trust.

[timmydakolo2]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

Managers are just there to do their job and you in other hand do proper research before jumping in. But it's really painful when you wasted all time and effort on the project and later turns SCAM.

[gundala]

Snip----
Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

I think we can't blame the bounty manager completely. Unless the bounty manager comes from the developer team, then it seems they really want to cheat from the start. Another case if the bounty manager comes from outside the development team, it could be that the BM is also deceived like us. BM is also human, we should be able to think wisely by not blaming each other.

[marapundavela]

Of course they should not be blamed. If you put yourself in their shoes their job is really tough. We shouldnt blame the because scammed projects are unpredictable. Each and everyone must do a research before joining bounties to avoid this incident.

[elzjmirra]

Blame the Manager bounty will not solve your problem. This is our fault for not being careful in deciding the ICO project. To be aware of prior to following ICO, we should be able to do some checking on all aspects of the ICO project. And you can choose a very experienced team of ICO.