[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[jedimstr]

Hi Terk !

When will your Asian server be up?

My user id is 1EeijSR9kPSfSzRPonEwxUxUzyNKrue9AT.My rejection rate on the server is 11% now. It seems high

Sometimes I experience a higher rejection rate than normal, but after a while it's all good again. I'm not sure what is causing that.

I'm mining on the Amsterdam server by the way, and I like it . (Allthough the rewards Always can be better of course ).

Varying rejects are normal. We are switching coins and different coins have different rejects ratio.

I completely agree ,but after 12 hours of mining it was at 10 to 11% no downward trend towards decent rejection ratio of 2 to 4 %.

Not tooting CS horn, but I always find the answers Terk gives funny. VT, the dev of CS, wrote a custom stratum for CS and well, it worked. I have like 1 reject per 48 hrs. However I do get stales. Which CM should if it was switching fast, not rejects.

That statement's a bit non-sensical... Stales count as Rejects (at least True Stales... not the fake Stales that sometimes CGMiner or BFGMiner reports due to not recognizing a blockchain change).  If they aren't by your pool, then that's a bug (perhaps in your favor, but still a bug).

Sure, but from my understanding, the fast switching, is the reason for stales. You switch to a diff coin, and the late block comes in of a different coin, causing it to be stale and not rejected b/c you are no longer mining that coin. I could be wrong? And in turn not hurting you b/c you are on to the next coin?

That stale is a reject if it comes after the blockchain change.  Some pool's threshold for which shares to accept for credit towards payment differs (from no tolerance, to maybe a minute after the switchover), but technically that stale share is a reject.   

The opposite case where let's say CGMiner and BFGMiner (or other software) doesn't recognize the blockchain change/switchover and thinks new shares from the new coin are "stale"... those are actually valid which is why you should never have --no-submit-stale.

[p2mmao]

Anyone call help me?

my cg-miner shows my avg hash rate is 633.6Kh/s, but clevermining user stat page shows 456.7Kh/s (without any rejection ), why there's so much difference?

thx

[Terk]

Anyone call help me?

my cg-miner shows my avg hash rate is 633.6Kh/s, but clevermining user stat page shows 456.7Kh/s (without any rejection ), why there's so much difference?

thx

What's your username?

Stats page might be confusing if you just started mining (I need to change it). Last hour hashrate is actually sum of your submitted shares divided by 60 minutes. So if you started mining 20 minutes after full hour and you are just after first hour of mining, your shares submitted in 40 minutes will be divided by 60 and your first hour average hashrate will be shown as lower.

[p2mmao]

Anyone call help me?

my cg-miner shows my avg hash rate is 633.6Kh/s, but clevermining user stat page shows 456.7Kh/s (without any rejection ), why there's so much difference?

thx

What's your username?

Stats page might be confusing if you just started mining (I need to change it). Last hour hashrate is actually sum of your submitted shares divided by 60 minutes. So if you started mining 20 minutes after full hour and you are just after first hour of mining, your shares submitted in 40 minutes will be divided by 60 and your first hour average hashrate will be shown as lower.

19BUKPbQzj2AG6Vj8YcnFLkk1fBcTQQzHd

[Terk]

Anyone call help me?

my cg-miner shows my avg hash rate is 633.6Kh/s, but clevermining user stat page shows 456.7Kh/s (without any rejection ), why there's so much difference?

thx

What's your username?

Stats page might be confusing if you just started mining (I need to change it). Last hour hashrate is actually sum of your submitted shares divided by 60 minutes. So if you started mining 20 minutes after full hour and you are just after first hour of mining, your shares submitted in 40 minutes will be divided by 60 and your first hour average hashrate will be shown as lower.

19BUKPbQzj2AG6Vj8YcnFLkk1fBcTQQzHd

Everything seems fine on my side. From your hashrate chart looks like your hashrate decreased from ~600 to ~450 kH/s some 3-4 days ago. Please make sure that all your GPUs are running and that none was switched to some backup pool. I read reports about cases when GPU was frozen/hung up but miner software was still reporting some hashrate (even if GPU wasn't clearly mining anything). Did you try to restart your miners?

[jedimindtriks]

Would it be possible to get paid in Litecoin? bitcoin price is going to hell.

is this feasible?

[Xenocyde]

LTC price is directly tied to BTC price so it's going down as well. I don't see the point of getting paid in LTC.

[VirosaGITS]

Hmm... $1.84 for 1mh on ltc per daily power cost $1.20, pool fee 0.04$ = profit 0.60 cents/day.

Methink some miners better turn off their mining machines.

[rahrahrah]

Hmm... $1.84 for 1mh on ltc per daily power cost $1.20, pool fee 0.04$ = profit 0.60 cents/day.

Methink some miners better turn off their mining machines.

Had better turn them off? This only makes sense if a) there is no profit (your calculations say there is) and b) you're selling your Crypto to pay for your electricity. Or if you're mining but you're a bear.

[rahrahrah]

LTC price is directly tied to BTC price so it's going down as well. I don't see the point of getting paid in LTC.

I'd rather be paid in BTC too.
However LTC price is not *directly* tied to BTC, although they show strong relationships in price fluctuations.

[northener]

Hello,

I just pointed my miners to your pool but i get a lot of rejects and if i try to decrease my TC i get very low kh/s .

A lot of time i get this message:

Rejected untracked stratum share  from pool 0   


Any suggestions?

p.s. I cannot see my stats (Host down) when i go searching my account

[Terk]

Hello,

I just pointed my miners to your pool but i get a lot of rejects and if i try to decrease my TC i get very low kh/s .

A lot of time i get this message:

Rejected untracked stratum share  from pool 0   


Any suggestions?

p.s. I cannot see my stats (Host down) when i go searching my account

Rejected untracked stratum share are not real rejects. There is some miscommunication between the pool and the miner.

For reject stats, you need to ignore the top line in cgminer/sgminer as it mistakenly counts these untracked lines. Your real rejects are in per-GPU stats. These numbers are correct.

[zneww]

off topic for those interested...


CoinSolver is introduction a Scrypt-N Multipool. http://coinsolver.com/blog/

[Xenocyde]

Scrypt-N coins are worse than LTC these days profit-wise. With the ASICs invasion coming soon, we should really look into X11 coins.

[Adibandi]

Hello, i have bitcoin wallet 0.8.6 , and on the website it shows that i was payed 0,0109 btc , i have over 100 confirmations on the blockchain but nithing in my wallet. Do i need to upgrade it to bitcoin core? Or version 0.9 or what is going on?



Address is 1HxQbgxcfeADoF8ma6eZ9XHrf9MLTDdVk2

Txid. fe109a8673ebb8eae7ac46d93cd1ccff52889b0565be2a8a2ee3c9c958ba87dd

[ghur]

Scrypt-N coins are worse than LTC these days profit-wise. With the ASICs invasion coming soon, we should really look into X11 coins.

I really don't get this X11 hype. Some people mistakenly think it's some anti-ASIC messiah.
It's a chain of algos that had an important design requirement to support ASICs.

X11 is significantly more trivial for hardware makers to build hardware for than it has been for Scrypt.
And should X11 hardware be made, it will be speedups similar to what we've seen for bitcoin.
So I really don't get where the hype is coming from. Guess more uninformed masses as usual...

[Xenocyde]

Scrypt-N coins are worse than LTC these days profit-wise. With the ASICs invasion coming soon, we should really look into X11 coins.

I really don't get this X11 hype. Some people mistakenly think it's some anti-ASIC messiah.
It's a chain of algos that had an important design requirement to support ASICs.

X11 is significantly more trivial for hardware makers to build hardware for than it has been for Scrypt.
And should X11 hardware be made, it will be speedups similar to what we've seen for bitcoin.
So I really don't get where the hype is coming from. Guess more uninformed masses as usual...

The point is not so much about the ASICs, but about profitability and energy savings. Right now X11 is better energy-wise, eating only half of what scrypt and scrypt-n makes GPUs eat for 0.004 BTC/mh/s/day.

[zneww]

Scrypt-N coins are worse than LTC these days profit-wise. With the ASICs invasion coming soon, we should really look into X11 coins.

I really don't get this X11 hype. Some people mistakenly think it's some anti-ASIC messiah.
It's a chain of algos that had an important design requirement to support ASICs.

X11 is significantly more trivial for hardware makers to build hardware for than it has been for Scrypt.
And should X11 hardware be made, it will be speedups similar to what we've seen for bitcoin.
So I really don't get where the hype is coming from. Guess more uninformed masses as usual...

The point is not so much about the ASICs, but about profitability and energy savings. Right now X11 is better energy-wise, eating only half of what scrypt and scrypt-n makes GPUs eat for 0.004 BTC/mh/s/day.

Can I see your data on where Scrypt-N is worse then LTC?

[Xenocyde]

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/?sort=profit&dir=desc

[zneww]

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/?sort=profit&dir=desc

ha...Coinwarz is not real data.

Real data:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514242.0

On avg Vert is higher. Marginally. Once ASIC hit, we will be waiting.