bitcoin and blockchain resistant to quantum attacks

[mario.curiel]

I hope bitcointalk doesnt censor this:

A path, tat makes cryptocurrencies and blockchains safer, and resistant to quantum attacks, reduces stolen coins in largest exchanges,or  stolen wallets.

it is different, because adds what satoshi missed: space.

em.edu.mx/mb18.pdf

[1714972224]

1714972224

[1714972224]

1714972224

[1714972224]

1714972224

[RGBKey]

Your link seems to be broken. Do you have a mirror available?

Bitcointalk doesn't censor anything that doesn't break the forum rules. Even if you're wrong, you can generally still post here.

[butka]

Your link seems to be broken. Do you have a mirror available?

Yes, his link seems to be broken. A google search gives a similar link:

http://em.edu.mx/assets/files/mb18.pdf

which is a poor attempt to introduce a Multidimensional Blockchain. It makes no sense, whatsoever.

[RGBKey]

Your link seems to be broken. Do you have a mirror available?

Yes, his link seems to be broken. A google search gives a similar link:

http://em.edu.mx/assets/files/mb18.pdf

which is a poor attempt to introduce a Multidimensional Blockchain. It makes no sense, whatsoever.

Thanks.

This means that the core hashes and calculations at its core are based on only one dimension: time. But having only one dimension has shown that it is weak for virtual currencies stored in exchanges and wallets. Eachtime more currencies are stolen from Exchanges, and users lost wallets and their money.

This is not a fault of any cryptocurrency, but of the exchange. Not properly securing their service has no relation to the security of a cryptocurrency.

The rest of your paper is just more nonsense based on the idea that the security in a blockchain is ever provided by a timestamp. I can't think of a single cryptocurrency where that is the case. The security comes from transactions included in blocks, backed by the hashing power of the entire Bitcoin network.

If you would like to understand more about how Bitcoin actually works, I highly suggest you read the original Bitcoin whitepaper. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

[mario.curiel]

Thank you for your Feedback.

1)Erasure of articles.
   Yes, this same article was previously deleted by the bitcointalk forum the past week.
   yes, That is why added that line.

2)Of course I have read previously the bitcoin whiteparer.
In fact this document is a critique to that satoshi's bitcoin document.
    in fact The core of the bitcoin paper is hash with timestamp, and hash alone is weak.
      all blockchainss and currencies depend on timestamp. bingo!

3)Of course it will make no sense for people, they are trained in blind faith in blockchain.
  In fact, The document is part of a quantum scientific model, in that time it was reviewed by prize nobel associations years ago.
  now adding their grain of rice to blockchain.
  In fact the document is  introducing a change in the way people think computing and programming: And as derivated consequence simple normal computer that can defend against a quantum attack. An evolution over blockchain. safer currencies.
 

In past times 99.999% people said that the earth was flat, and one said that earth was not flat, then other came and said earth was not the center of the universe.

That idea makes no sense for that 99.9999 of people, because you are used to think in that way.

I thank you all for your feedback.

[NeuroticFish]

3)Of course it will make no sense for people, they are trained in blind faith in blockchain.

No, it makes no sense because either you didn't explain it well, either is not applicable.
You have to understand that others don't have your background and don't think exactly like you.

Now, you propose instead one dimension - time, multiple dimensions. The second dimension is location. If I understood the things right, you want to improve the blocks in the blockchain.

Now, since a block is mined, since the miners are spread out around the world, since the block can contain transactions from all over the world, I have some problems for you:
1. What would be the relevance of location? I mean, what makes a block mined in Sichuan better or worse than one mined in LA? Is there any difference?

2. Let's say 2 blocks are mined in the same time in different locations. 1D chain will have to decide which one remains as the good block (temporary fork). In your model both blocks are good. But wait, they contain different transactions - some are in both blocks, some are completely different - correct blocks are needed to see where the money comes from when you spend. How can a MD chain handle this without messing it up because of duplication?