Project without team members

[MiF]

Project without team should not be trusted, if someone is creating a project and believe on the project no need hiding his identity from the public, i wont  invest my money on a project without team.

  Precisely, a project without a team may called a scam. Investor do trust to invest on project as it was develope promisingly, with a good prospect based on whitepaper and roadmap, and most by looking on how the team united. We can only determine how reliable the project to be penetrated, when it has a good aspect. So be wise by choosing on which of the project has a good quality and shown good aspect before to invest, just to evade of lacking scam.

[1713564632]

1713564632

[1713564632]

1713564632

[1713564632]

1713564632

[1713564632]

1713564632

[Komireak]

There are only about few ICO or crypto that has no group and moved toward becoming achievement . Evidently all financial specialists and broker will investigate it to check whether the group can do the task fruitful .

[bawa_23]

Project which hide the true identity of their team members, are to be doubted, team members should be publicized, Project should have Whitepaper, Telegram without it must be a scam. Personally I would not invest in it. Investors also will probably will note invest in it.

[freim]

For the first time I hear the concept of a project that is not a team member. I mean, I would not want to be in such a project. For me, a team of projectmen is very important.

[a_t_e_e_b]

i don't think like any ico can succeed without a team it is probably a scam these ico's usually just die after launch or just don't launch and the project is shut down

[reighbut2017]

Hy all.

There is something bordering me and I will like to share with you all.  have been wondering if we need any Jupiter to tell us that a project without team members and no whitepapers are like to scam.
My questions is that have you seen any bounty campaign without team members and the project succeeded?
If such is there please outline let look into such project and loop it out.

Based on my own strategy, First thing that i checked prior investing on a project is the project team members i used to research each team member to validate if the project is using legitimate people to run the project and In your case where the project don't have  team members so I suggest do not invest on it as this may risk your money.

[Ziltoid]

Now find the link but remember when you saw any project. The team members had horse faces instead of faces in the photos. I do not know whether the project collected at least sofcap but it looked wildly

[so_stupid]

I saw one project without members. If not mistaken, it was called the etherium black. But all the same he scampered after the airdrop 

[Dcoollakky247]

Hy all.

There is something bordering me and I will like to share with you all.  have been wondering if we need any Jupiter to tell us that a project without team members and no whitepapers are like to scam.
My questions is that have you seen any bounty campaign without team members and the project succeeded?
If such is there please outline let look into such project and loop it out.

In short, you don't need any Uranus, Venus or Mars to tell that any project without team members are nothing but scam

[carcas]

Looks failed and has no value. how do buyers or investors believe in the future of the project? investors want to know who is involved in the development of the project.

[genset88]

There are many projects which have "anonymous team". I think this's normal, I always wonder how they can build trust with investors. Investors don't know who they are, where they come from.

[zedaq]

Perhaps the word here is unusual - unusual. If you want to say that you can start the development process alone, then you can try, but then the money will not be big either. Probably the most important thing is the idea.

[mr.creampie]

Nope there wont be a project that will succeed without those important keys.Project member,whitepaper good website and developers are needed also the product must be working too so that investors wont hesitate to invest to that project because most of these ICO scams has those shortcomings,poor whitepaper,poor website and fraudulent team members are red flags.

[webdevmastery]

Hy all.

There is something bordering me and I will like to share with you all.  have been wondering if we need any Jupiter to tell us that a project without team members and no whitepapers are like to scam.
My questions is that have you seen any bounty campaign without team members and the project succeeded?
If such is there please outline let look into such project and loop it out.

Developers are the people who are creating the market strategy and the entire project so obviously you are looking at a scam ico so you should avoid joining that bounty or investing on their coin.

[husanlarisa]

For the first time I hear the concept of a project that is not a team member. I mean, I would not want to be in such a project. For me, a team of projectmen is very important.

Agree with you.
If there's no team members, then it may indicate that project is bullsh@t and scam.
It is like if facebook and twitter didn't have team members, lol

[inillo]

Just run. Nothing today justifies a project without know members is just like giving your cash away to any scamer that does not even have to bother to put a fake picture and a convincing project.

[ColorfulJoseph]

The best project you could find is the one where the team is completely public, their social media, their background,etc. It means they are responsible for any fails in the project, and that is good for investors.

[Ninellechka]

There's always a team behind any project. There's always a developer otherwise the project can't exist. The question is whether a team wants to show themselves. And many people either investors or hunters get scared when they don't see happy smiling faces of team members in the photos on the website or a WP. In fact, before running away from such projects, think whether they should show themselves? May be their project presents anonymous decentralized crypto maintained and driven by the community? Who then cares how devs look like?) I've seen projects totally public, even with personal contacts of devs, proved by linkedin, but they've ended up impudent scams. And I've seen projects with unknown teams and they're still doing great and developing.

[IrinaPro94]

for me, when choosing a project, one of the main criteria is the team. after all, if you know who is engaged in the development of this coin, you can analyze its future. so I don't represent a company without a team.

[alrose]

Personally for me, if the project team is not advertised, then this is not a priori cause of confidence. Therefore, I bypass these projects, and I do not even consider them to participate in the bounty company, much less for investment.