Why were threads about Stunna recently expunge from this forum and by whom?

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Here's one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3109396.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81292

Name:   Stunna
Posts:   3519
Activity:   1946
Merit:   1047
Position:   Legendary
Date Registered:   February 14, 2013, 12:58:21 AM
Last Active:   June 24, 2018, 07:08:28 PM

Surely, King Shit Global Mod-CUM-Lamborghini Member and Stunna shill, hilariousandco, didn't have anything to do with it, but I have my doubts.

Full Disclosure: I'm about to open up a fuckin giant can of worms. I suggest you folks at home fire up some popcorn, for I have a strong feeling that this is gonna get very, very, very interesting.

In the voice of Leroy Fodor and Stunna, HAHAHA!!!

Bruno

[1714653692]

1714653692

[1714653692]

1714653692

[1714653692]

1714653692

[1714653692]

1714653692

[hilariousandco]

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

And I don't believe I trashed it, but good luck on your witch hunt.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

And I don't believe I trashed it, but good luck on your witch hunt.

So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway?

"From the grave, I see popcorn futures rising in spite of the Trade War."

[hilariousandco]

So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway?

In the trashcan, which any member of staff can see.

[Diamond Member]

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

Is it normal to move threads with replies to the trashcan like that? To me, it would make more sense to move those types of threads to the archives or to lock them. Moving threads like this to the trashcan makes it smell like something is being hidden.

[YuTü.Co.in]

So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway?

In the trashcan, which any member of staff can see.

So, prey tell why you promote an entity that even those that aren't versed in crypto consider it a scam?

Proof: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22stake.com%22+scam

BTW, thanks for deleting the following post of mine. You're the man!

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Meanwhile, which mods do I have to suck off in getting this entity tagged as a scam? --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4486941.0. Or are they too fuckin busy tagging activity that's basically no count?

I'm sure you're about to tag it given that nothing gets past you.

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

Is it normal to move threads with replies to the trashcan like that? To me, it would make more sense to move those types of threads to the archives or to lock them. Moving threads like this to the trashcan makes it smell like something is being hidden.

Dude, please don't introduce logic into this thread.   <highlighted so that H & Co. doesn't miss it>

Further, why are US citizens playing on the site when it's supposedly locked to US players?

[actmyname]

So, prey tell why you promote an entity that even those that aren't versed in crypto consider it a scam?

Proof: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22stake.com%22+scam

Just to toss an objective opinion out there: there are bound to be results for every "[casino] scam" google search so there's no point in really trying to put that on blast. The games are provably fair and the site pays out. Also, a lot of the results I'm seeing are crypto sites.

Plus, when you get golden sites saying that Stake is a ponzi scheme, I think a lot of these criticisms should be taken with a grain heap of salt.

This is, however, not to say that Stake is absolutely legitimate.

[hilariousandco]

Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

Is it normal to move threads with replies to the trashcan like that? To me, it would make more sense to move those types of threads to the archives or to lock them. Moving threads like this to the trashcan makes it smell like something is being hidden.

Oh look, a wild alt account appears. Any takers that this is QS? Threads are either trashed or archived but I guess it's down to personal choice of the mod, but when a thread is made from a brand new account and he then later edits all his posts to nothing I don't see why it needs to stay. It also seems like it may have been a doxxing or attempting to dox but I can't tell as all the posts have been edited. Relevant post from that thread:

I am a nobody but Millions of people have gambled on his casino and nobody ever wondered who he is?

He is here online everyday promoting Full transparency and I would like to know who he is.

Who is Stunna?

This is Bitcoin, nearly everyone is anonymous here. The only thing that makes you different is that you are an anonymous hypocrite.

The other reason you don't use your real account is you are likely to get banned.

The reason that doxxing has been allowed up until now is that it's occasionally very useful in scam investigations. However, oftentimes doxxing someone is used as a weapon in itself instead of a part of any investigation, and as a result innocent people are sometimes hurt. So to protect the innocent while hopefully not hampering scam investigations too much, here are some new rules on doxxing:

1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.

This applies retroactively to old posts. If a thread contains a lot of personal information strewn throughout it, then the whole thread will be moved to Investigations. If it's only a few posts, then those will be split off. From now on, it's probably a good idea to create two threads for big scammers: one in Scam Accusations and one in Investigations.

From time to time there may be cases where it is very desirable to publish some results of an investigation. For example, if a class action lawsuit is filed, then the person's username should probably at least be publicly linked to the legal case so that other people can join in. For now, there is no uniform policy for this, and if you need to make some personal info public, post in Meta and we will deal with it on a case-by-case basis.

And as I said above, I don't believe I was the one who trashed it but I probably would have had it been reported or I came across it.

BTW, thanks for deleting the following post of mine. You're the man!

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Meanwhile, which mods do I have to suck off in getting this entity tagged as a scam? --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4486941.0. Or are they too fuckin busy tagging activity that's basically no count?

This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks.

[YuTü.Co.in]

So, prey tell why you promote an entity that even those that aren't versed in crypto consider it a scam?

Proof: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22stake.com%22+scam

Just to toss an objective opinion out there: there are bound to be results for every "[casino] scam" google search so there's no point in really trying to put that on blast. The games are provably fair and the site pays out. Also, a lot of the results I'm seeing are crypto sites.

Plus, when you get golden sites saying that Stake is a ponzi scheme, I think a lot of these criticisms should be taken with a grain heap of salt.

This is, however, not to say that Stake is absolutely legitimate.

But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login.

This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks.

My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that?

Speaking of not allowing shit, this ...

It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.

I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc.

When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure.

PS: To be fair, I appreciate the warning of double/triple posting. Seriously, not satire. I'll improve in that regard.

PSS: I just remember about the time Josh Zipkin threaten to kill me and that even made the rounds on periodicals, but he wasn't banned.

Meanwhile, the plot thickens ...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffownby/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9192526#msg9192526

"The following domains are in Jeff Ownby's control."

[Diamond Member]

when a thread is made from a brand new account and he then later edits all his posts to nothing I don't see why it needs to stay.

I will just throw this out there; the thread should stay because others replied to the thread that as you have just shown did not edit their posts to nothing. Another reason would include that the thread may indicate evidence of wrongdoing somewhere down the line, or may otherwise provide evidence of wrongdoing, or perhaps evidence of someone's innocence.

[actmyname]

But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com?

This is a teapot argument and lacks substance. It can be treated as a blanket statement. Rhetoric.

Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy

In order to allow enforcement when the case is more ambiguous - in the 'grey zone' of scam/not.

And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login.

Not sure why this is relevant when there is no evidence of Stake's scams, or rather lack thereof.

[hilariousandco]

But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login.

How do we know it isn't operated by Satohsi and I'm the Queen of England? None of this has anything to do with this thread. Open up another if you want to invent conspiracies up or throw shit at a wall to see what sticks.

This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks.

My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that?

No, they weren't on topic, not to mention they were all double posts. And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post.

Speaking of not allowing shit, this ...

It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.

I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc.

When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure.

You can report them and they'll be removed or moved to the investigations board. The doxxing rule is fairly new or at least was probably implemented long after your incident.

PSS: I just remember about the time Josh Zipkin threaten to kill me and that even made the rounds on periodicals, but he wasn't banned.

Meanwhile, the plot thickens ...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956

No, I don't see how the plot thickens. Does you making a post that mentions Zipkin or BFL or whoever mean anything and thereof must be investigated? But please, go ahead. I've always enjoyed reading your posts because they're insanely entertaining at least (emphasis on insane), but again, this is completely off topic. Open up a new thread if you want to go on wild goose chases whilst clutching at invisible straws. Thanks.

[YuTü.Co.in]

But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login.

How do we know it isn't operated by Satohsi and I'm the Queen of England? None of this has anything to do with this thread. Open up another if you want to invent conspiracies up or throw shit at a wall to see what sticks.

This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks.

My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that?

No, they weren't on topic, not to mention they were all double posts. And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post.

Speaking of not allowing shit, this ...

It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.

I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc.

When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure.

You can report them and they'll be removed or moved to the investigations board. The doxxing rule is fairly new or at least was probably implemented long after your incident.

PSS: I just remember about the time Josh Zipkin threaten to kill me and that even made the rounds on periodicals, but he wasn't banned.

Meanwhile, the plot thickens ...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956

No, I don't see how the plot thickens. Does you making a post that mentions Zipkin or BFL or whoever mean anything and thereof must be investigated? But please, go ahead. I've always enjoyed reading your posts because they're insanely entertaining at least (emphasis on insane), but again, this is completely off topic. Open up a new thread if you want to go on wild goose chases whilst clutching at invisible straws. Thanks.

<more was added to the post you quoted, with apologies, for I didn't want to start a new post so to abide by the not posting back-to-back rule which I concur is valid and wanted to stay within compliance in that regard>

Meanwhile, the plot thickens ...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffownby/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9192526#msg9192526

"The following domains are in Jeff Ownby's control."

Please enlighten me as to how it's off topic when the subject is that your sig pertains to a site deemed a scam by others that I'm advancing?

Further, in re ...

And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post.

So, if I post that such-and-such is a scam and should be tagged by the mods and it's deleted, then I'm forbidden in ever posting such sentiment ever again? That don't seem fair at all. Exactly where I can read such rule that you cited?


Wait, there's more ...

Upon further investigating, there's probably no connection between Jeff Ownby and Mr. Micro, but I found something even more interesting worthy of red trust ...

Please pay close attention, for this is some complicated shit ...

Micro posted his address here ...

King mrbitty 1GyDQ3npFsa72Ute6bXm3wen7U1GEFfpF4

Micro also posted the following ...

Hehe... First time to win this bet, and that is today on my birthday . So tnx PrimeDice for this great birthday present .

https://primedice.com/modals/bet.html?id=424347553


Screenshot_1 by MICROV91, on Flickr

Micro is so lucky. Everybody clap for Micro.

Get the popcorn ready, for shit is about to hit the fan ...

Remember that address above? Well ...

https://mobile.twitter.com/BTCMICRO/status/447067656516952064

https://twitter.com/BTCMICRO

To be clear, the topic is why your sig contains an assumed scam site and I've demonstrated that the person behind the site 100% lied as to his connection to PrimeDice aka Stake.com, thus deserves being red tagged and you removing their sig unless, that is, you delete this post under the fucked up auspices that I'm off-topic, thus forbidding me to bringing this subject up ever again by the rule you cited which I'm still waiting for verification.

Your move! Ain't this a fun game?

[digaran]

I would like to present my own conspiracy theory, our Godless P & S mod has tried to endorse a total scam ICO ran by OP's alt YuTü.Co.in. what is more interesting is the fact that FHF suddenly became interested in joining signature campaigns and suddenly started endorsing a desperate attempt at scamming unsuspected forum members. they are using the "staff" tag under their names left and right to line their own pockets, engaging in account sales, PMing forum members to take part in their scam ass ICO and they think that we're some village idiots.

Enough is enough, suchmoon is also in cahoots with OP and she has tried to help this scammer multiple times. these cartel-like activities must end.

Now on topic, if you have questions, ask them and wait for your answers, when a global mod gives you the answers if you are not satisfied you could PM an admin to ask for more detailed explanation. I would also like to mention that wearing a signature doesn't mean they are endorsing the product or site.
Further more I'd like to point to the fact that OP is an account seller, their alts are: Gleb, YuTü.Co.in, AGLD and more.

[YuTü.Co.in]

I would like to present my own conspiracy theory, our Godless P & S mod has tried to endorse a total scam ICO ran by OP's alt YuTü.Co.in. what is more interesting is the fact that FHF suddenly became interested in joining signature campaigns and suddenly started endorsing a desperate attempt at scamming unsuspected forum members. they are using the "staff" tag under their names left and right to line their own pockets, engaging in account sales, PMing forum members to take part in their scam ass ICO and they think that we're some village idiots.

Enough is enough, suchmoon is also in cahoots with OP and she has tried to help this scammer multiple times. these cartel-like activities must end.

Now on topic, if you have questions, ask them and wait for your answers, when a global mod gives you the answers if you are not satisfied you could PM an admin to ask for more detailed explanation. I would also like to mention that wearing a signature doesn't mean they are endorsing the product or site.
Further more I'd like to point to the fact that OP is an account seller, their alts are: Gleb, YuTü.Co.in, AGLD and more.

Thanks for your wonderful insight, bud. Now comment on my last post above yours or is that too much for your pee brain to absorb?

[hilariousetc]

Please enlighten me as to how it's off topic when the subject is that your sig pertains to a site deemed a scam by others that I'm advancing?

The thread is about who deleted the Stake thread and for whatever reasons. It's not for anything at all that vaguely relates to stake, and especially not for baseless accusations and wild goose chases. Open up another thread in the correct section if you want to do that but it certainly doesn't belong in here or in Meta.

And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post.

So, if I post that such-and-such is a scam and should be tagged by the mods and it's deleted, then I'm forbidden in ever posting such sentiment ever again? That don't seem fair at all. Exactly where I can read such rule that you cited?

No, but post it in the right thread. Posting "I like Persian Cats" in what sort of dogs do you like? thread is off topic, but not in a what sort of cats do you like? thread. Post it there, not here and off topic.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Please enlighten me as to how it's off topic when the subject is that your sig pertains to a site deemed a scam by others that I'm advancing?

The thread is about who deleted the Stake thread and for whatever reasons. It's not for anything at all that vaguely relates to stake, and especially not for baseless accusations and wild goose chases. Open up another thread in the correct section if you want to do that but it certainly doesn't belong in here or in Meta.

And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post.

So, if I post that such-and-such is a scam and should be tagged by the mods and it's deleted, then I'm forbidden in ever posting such sentiment ever again? That don't seem fair at all. Exactly where I can read such rule that you cited?

No, but post it in the right thread. Posting "I like Persian Cats" in what sort of dogs do you like? thread is off topic, but not in a what sort of cats do you like? thread. Post it there, not here and off topic.

Dude, I'm tired and do see where I fucked up upon review in re posting off-topic. I'll lock this and start anew tomorrow.

Bruno