Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 11:32:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: New coins but no hashpower???  (Read 522 times)
Jilixi (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 07:59:38 PM
 #1

So I am just wondering if anyone has brought this topic up yet, but isnt it soon going to be that there are too many coins that all take away a part of the global hashpower.

Its easy for anyone with some programming knowledge to make a coin, however for anyone to start mining, lets just say money dont grow on trees.

So my question is, is the number of coins to many to have a stable hashrate on any coin?

are the coin creaters are basiclly killing their own projects?Huh

Owner of BlackCoin Store - BlackCoin Store
BC: BNatbck1SDJebHRMQemkUEFPVZR9uLHLrM
BTC: 161EcdmbgmxpZMk2ssZCjGQqB6gypduu97
1714951954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714951954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714951954
Reply with quote  #2

1714951954
Report to moderator
1714951954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714951954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714951954
Reply with quote  #2

1714951954
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714951954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714951954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714951954
Reply with quote  #2

1714951954
Report to moderator
1714951954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714951954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714951954
Reply with quote  #2

1714951954
Report to moderator
1714951954
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714951954

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714951954
Reply with quote  #2

1714951954
Report to moderator
anderl
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 08:04:15 PM
 #2

So I am just wondering if anyone has brought this topic up yet, but isnt it soon going to be that there are too many coins that all take away a part of the global hashpower.

Its easy for anyone with some programming knowledge to make a coin, however for anyone to start mining, lets just say money dont grow on trees.

So my question is, is the number of coins to many to have a stable hashrate on any coin?

are the coin creaters are basiclly killing their own projects?Huh

It's a free market and miners will only mine coins they feel will have longevity.  Some will make mistakes but it is true they are killing their coins if the coins do not have some kind of utility and staying power.  Most coins will not survive, that is the nature of the market.
Jilixi (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 09, 2014, 08:11:47 PM
 #3

So I am just wondering if anyone has brought this topic up yet, but isnt it soon going to be that there are too many coins that all take away a part of the global hashpower.

Its easy for anyone with some programming knowledge to make a coin, however for anyone to start mining, lets just say money dont grow on trees.

So my question is, is the number of coins to many to have a stable hashrate on any coin?

are the coin creaters are basiclly killing their own projects?Huh

It's a free market and miners will only mine coins they feel will have longevity.  Some will make mistakes but it is true they are killing their coins if the coins do not have some kind of utility and staying power.  Most coins will not survive, that is the nature of the market.

Well how do you define a "dead" coin? I have never seen coins being removed from lets say Cryptsy, a coin that is still being traded is still a coin that is "alive" even though the Volume is at 0.1BTC.

Something keeps telling me each day that a little bit of regulation wouldnt be bad after all. Something that sorts out shit, shit that shouldnt ever make it to the point so that I can read about it.

There has been 4 something drug coins the past week, its stupid really.

Owner of BlackCoin Store - BlackCoin Store
BC: BNatbck1SDJebHRMQemkUEFPVZR9uLHLrM
BTC: 161EcdmbgmxpZMk2ssZCjGQqB6gypduu97
LAFreeze
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 09, 2014, 08:18:46 PM
 #4

Most coins quickly reach 1 GHash, and then drop silently... and so does their price. This power may come from the big established coins (top-10), or from those who keep hopping new projects, hoping to hit the next big thing. As soon as they realize it's nothing, they quit. There will always be folks who believe in the new coin, but usually after the initial rush nobody wants to pay for it any more, so it becomes a stalemate. Nothing won, nothing lost.
anderl
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 09, 2014, 08:29:18 PM
 #5

So I am just wondering if anyone has brought this topic up yet, but isnt it soon going to be that there are too many coins that all take away a part of the global hashpower.

Its easy for anyone with some programming knowledge to make a coin, however for anyone to start mining, lets just say money dont grow on trees.

So my question is, is the number of coins to many to have a stable hashrate on any coin?

are the coin creaters are basiclly killing their own projects?Huh

It's a free market and miners will only mine coins they feel will have longevity.  Some will make mistakes but it is true they are killing their coins if the coins do not have some kind of utility and staying power.  Most coins will not survive, that is the nature of the market.

Well how do you define a "dead" coin? I have never seen coins being removed from lets say Cryptsy, a coin that is still being traded is still a coin that is "alive" even though the Volume is at 0.1BTC.

Something keeps telling me each day that a little bit of regulation wouldnt be bad after all. Something that sorts out shit, shit that shouldnt ever make it to the point so that I can read about it.

There has been 4 something drug coins the past week, its stupid really.

A dead coin is one that is no longer mined, or is prone to a 51% attack from a single miner.  If  the network is not running then the coins can't be transferred from a wallet to an exchange and back again.

I do not agree with regulation.  I think that the crypto market could do well with organizations that can rate the quality of coin networks for miners, investors, etc.  Exchanges right now have their own independent metric for rating the quality of coins.  I think the system is working. 

If you have a concern about the quality of a coin, its network etc then I would recommend avoiding it regardless of what exchange it is on. 

As for the rate of the coin creation, it is part of the market.  I am leaning more and more towards competent developers that have a proven track experience in successful coins in the past, or years of development experience.  Having a team is a plus.  Providing open source code ahead of release, providing the community a forum to discuss features or contribute to the project, and a significant involvement in the development of the coin and marketing it to the world.

Everything else is flash in the pan and not worth the time.  Best to just ignore them.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!