Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 12:10:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Gox actively attacking the network?  (Read 1387 times)
Entropy-uc (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:25:51 PM
 #1

I find the timing of this transaction spamming bot very suspicious.

There is no financial gain from running the bot, just aggro for uninformed users.  Their transactions do go through, all funds end up in the addresses where they belong, but they end up with a invalid transaction in their wallet that has to time out.  And of course there can be secondary effects if they have software that relies on outcomes that change because of the vandalism.

It's easy enough to argue that it's just some child exploiting a flaw for amusement. But to be having the far reaching impact that is being reported today, the script that is modifying transactions has to be running on well connected, high bandwidth nodes, and probably quite a few of them.  It also has to be nodes that promiscuously transmit zero fee transactions, which eliminate the mining pools as core suspects.

So who benefits from this behavior and has access to multiple highly connected nodes?

MtGox is the only candidate I see. 
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713528620
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713528620

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713528620
Reply with quote  #2

1713528620
Report to moderator
1713528620
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713528620

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713528620
Reply with quote  #2

1713528620
Report to moderator
whtchocla7e
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 116


Worlds Simplest Cryptocurrency Wallet


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:28:59 PM
Last edit: February 11, 2014, 06:17:41 PM by whtchocla7e
 #2

So who benefits from this behavior and has access to multiple highly connected nodes?

Everyone benefits because potential shortcomings are exposed. If the shortcomings are addressed, the network becomes stronger. If not, it's time to scrape the Bitcoin experiment...

Quote
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▅▆█ L E A D █▆▅▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
World's Simplest and Safest Decentralized Cryptocurrency Wallet!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ • STORE • SEND • SPEND • SWAP • STAKE • ▬▬▬▬▬▬
Barek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:31:11 PM
 #3

Does it matter?

Someone is demonstrating an attack and it is obviously causing at least an annoyance.

It raises the priority of addressing the transaction malleability issue.
Bitcoinpro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:33:13 PM
 #4

look up the meaning of altruistic, takes bow for superior understanding of english

WWW.FACEBOOK.COM

CRYPTOCURRENCY CENTRAL BANK

LTC: LP7bcFENVL9vdmUVea1M6FMyjSmUfsMVYf
coastermonger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 367
Merit: 250

Find me at Bitrated


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:34:04 PM
 #5

There may be individuals out there who are legitimately trying to take advantage of this quirk in the bitcoin protocol.  It's been known for years and hasn't been an issue unless your large scale service has forgotten to account for it when coding.

There may also be good or bad actors who are just doing it anyway as a method of stress testing the system. 

Whatever the case, if they keep it up it will require the devs to come together and actively make a push for more mainstream changes.  It will further hasten a consensus on how to facilitate transaction tracking and better secure against double spends.

Bitrated user: Rees.
Barek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:36:34 PM
 #6

Oh, and imagine if someone was doing this without Mt.Gox having brought it to everyone's attention.

People would be crying bloody 51% attack with all the "double spends" showing up on blockchain.info.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 05:37:22 PM
 #7

Even if they are, this is not really important as it causes no harm to the network.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
DubFX
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:42:28 PM
 #8

It quite makes sense, because people started noticing it only after these gox problems and people not believing them, no?
Barek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:46:16 PM
 #9

It quite makes sense, because people started noticing it only after these gox problems and people not believing them, no?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 06:08:54 PM
Last edit: February 24, 2014, 04:25:40 PM by bitpop
 #10

.

quone17
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 104


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 06:14:25 PM
 #11

it'd be great to something something fast from the foundation.  BTC is falling fast

Bitcoin Exchange Guide- List of the Top Bitcoin Exchanges, Find Places to Buy, Sell and Trade Bitcoins.
cr1776
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 1299


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:16:57 PM
 #12

It quite makes sense, because people started noticing it only after these gox problems and people not believing them, no?

Of course given how technically inept Gox has proven themselves over the last year++ we may be giving them too much credit.
Entropy-uc (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:24:58 AM
 #13

Does it matter?

Someone is demonstrating an attack and it is obviously causing at least an annoyance.

It raises the priority of addressing the transaction malleability issue.

It obviously matters very much.  If MtGox is actively attacking the network they cannot be trusted.
Barek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:32:42 AM
 #14

It obviously matters very much.  If MtGox is actively attacking the network they cannot be trusted.

So you prefer they just fix it on their part and carry on as usual? Meanwhile, the rest is getting scammed out of coins without being the wiser.

If it really was Mt.Gox and they were doing this to force the issue to be fixed ... I would be impressed.
Entropy-uc (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:39:45 AM
 #15

It obviously matters very much.  If MtGox is actively attacking the network they cannot be trusted.

So you prefer they just fix it on their part and carry on as usual? Meanwhile, the rest is getting scammed out of coins without being the wiser.

If it really was Mt.Gox and they were doing this to force the issue to be fixed ... I would be impressed.

No one except for Mt.Gox is being scammed out of coins.  And they were scammed due to their own negligence.

Spamming the network with modified transactions is the equivalent of a child throwing a temper tantrum.
Barek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:52:03 AM
 #16

No one except for Mt.Gox is being scammed out of coins.  And they were scammed due to their own negligence.

Spamming the network with modified transactions is the equivalent of a child throwing a temper tantrum.

You realize that the majority of the exchanges have halted withdrawals?

If the child throwing a temper tantrum causes Bitcoin to be more resilient and user friendly, have at it.
Entropy-uc (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:10:40 AM
 #17

No one except for Mt.Gox is being scammed out of coins.  And they were scammed due to their own negligence.

Spamming the network with modified transactions is the equivalent of a child throwing a temper tantrum.

You realize that the majority of the exchanges have halted withdrawals?

If the child throwing a temper tantrum causes Bitcoin to be more resilient and user friendly, have at it.

Pissing in the punch bowl isn't an acceptable method of pointing out that someone could piss in the punch bowl.  Malicious griefing of the network for no purpose other than to disguise your own incompetence is unacceptable.

If Mt.Gox is behind this action they should be taken out and shot like a rabid dog.

I hope some of the developers are tracking down the nodes spawning the altered transactions so proof will be available to the community soon.
Barek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:23:32 AM
 #18

Pissing in the punch bowl isn't an acceptable method of pointing out that someone could piss in the punch bowl.  Malicious griefing of the network for no purpose other than to disguise your own incompetence is unacceptable.

If Mt.Gox is behind this action they should be taken out and shot like a rabid dog.

All speculation. Any company will try to put blame elsewhere. The initial dev responses weren't much better.


I hope some of the developers are tracking down the nodes spawning the altered transactions so proof will be available to the community soon.

Not going to happen.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!