Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 01:33:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Underclocking the Memory Frequency?  (Read 1714 times)
NeonFlash (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 29, 2011, 09:42:03 AM
 #1

I read in many places that the Memory Clock Frequency is downclocked to 300 Mhz. What is the reason behind this? Does it help in reducing some kind of overhead?

My assumption is that Memory Clock frequency doesn't play much of a role for a task like Bitcoin Mining. What matters more is the GPU core clock frequency and stream processors.

Also, will it help to reduce the operating temperature of the GPU by decreasing the Memory Clock Frequency?
1714786429
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786429

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786429
Reply with quote  #2

1714786429
Report to moderator
1714786429
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786429

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786429
Reply with quote  #2

1714786429
Report to moderator
1714786429
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786429

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786429
Reply with quote  #2

1714786429
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714786429
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714786429

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714786429
Reply with quote  #2

1714786429
Report to moderator
dark_silverstar
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 29, 2011, 09:46:40 AM
 #2

not only reducing temperature, also reduce wattage as well  Grin
NeonFlash (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 29, 2011, 09:56:57 AM
 #3

Do you mean that decreasing the Memory Clock Frequency will help in reducing the voltage as well besides the operating temperature? Any stats that go along with it as an example?
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
September 29, 2011, 10:18:43 PM
 #4

It varies from card to card.  Best thing to do is test yourself.

I have a 3x5970 water cooled rigs.  With memory at full speed temps are 30C over ambient and it pulls 1080W at the wall.  With core overclocked to 900MHz (from 735MHz) and memory underclocked to 200MHz temps are 24C over ambient and it pulls 960 at the wall.

Best thing you can is experiment yourself.

Use a wall meter like Kill-a-watt, and set fan to static speed (say 70%) to record temps. 

Set it to one setting, run miner for 3 hours (for good sample size).  record temp, kWh used, and temp.  Adjust memory clock and repeat.
ssateneth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1004



View Profile
October 01, 2011, 01:43:53 AM
 #5

In addition to using less power (which means lower electricity bill = more net profit), there are certain memory timing thresholds at certain frequencies, as well as a few peaks of performance relating to worksize. I did an exhaustive amount of benches at various memory speeds. It's a little out of date and I really should run it on current kernels.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjXdY6gpvmJ4dEo4OXhwdTlyeS1Vc1hDWV94akJHZFE&hl=en_US#gid=0

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!