|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
evolve
|
 |
February 12, 2014, 02:55:22 AM |
|
Nothing. No one gun-shy about stock volatility is going to find the volatility of BTC comforting.
|
|
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007
|
|
February 12, 2014, 02:59:15 AM |
|
The trade price in US dollars would likely go down as the buying power of the dollar increased, but the actual buying power of those same bitcoins wouldn't likely be significantly effected in the same way. Keep in mind that a major stock crash, like the one in 1929 is highly deflationary; as is the destruction of debt. (Debts that turn bad are written off as uncollectable, or discharged in bankruptcy; both events result in the effective reduction of available liquidity, which is deflationary by defintion)
|
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:00:00 AM |
|
Nothing. No one gun-shy about stock volatility is going to find the volatility of BTC comforting.
Very true. If anything it might lead to an increase in Bitcoin prices as people seek to escape falling stock prices. |
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:01:41 AM |
|
The trade price in US dollars would likely go down as the buying power of the dollar increased, but the actual buying power of those same bitcoins wouldn't likely be significantly effected in the same way. Keep in mind that a major stock crash, like the one in 1929 is highly deflationary; as is the destruction of debt. (Debts that turn bad are written off as uncollectable, or discharged in bankruptcy; both events result in the effective reduction of available liquidity, which is deflationary by defintion)
Great point! |
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:13:44 AM |
|
The trade price in US dollars would likely go down as the buying power of the dollar increased, but the actual buying power of those same bitcoins wouldn't likely be significantly effected in the same way. Keep in mind that a major stock crash, like the one in 1929 is highly deflationary; as is the destruction of debt. (Debts that turn bad are written off as uncollectable, or discharged in bankruptcy; both events result in the effective reduction of available liquidity, which is deflationary by defintion)
Of course you are correct, but this is not 1929 and the U.S. is no longer on the gold standard. We almost know for certain what would happen because it already happened in 2008. The Fed (central bank) will create trillions of dollars out of nothing and go on a buying spree, the government will make massive bail-outs, Keynesian economists will provide cover for the whole operation and prices of everything (including bitcoin) will go up. It's not speculation. It's history. The fact that they got away with it is what guarantees that they will do it again. |
insert coin here:
Dash XfXZL8WL18zzNhaAqWqEziX2bUvyJbrC8s
1Ctd7Na8qE7btyueEshAJF5C7ZqFWH11Wc
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:29:19 AM |
|
The trade price in US dollars would likely go down as the buying power of the dollar increased, but the actual buying power of those same bitcoins wouldn't likely be significantly effected in the same way. Keep in mind that a major stock crash, like the one in 1929 is highly deflationary; as is the destruction of debt. (Debts that turn bad are written off as uncollectable, or discharged in bankruptcy; both events result in the effective reduction of available liquidity, which is deflationary by defintion)
Of course you are correct, but this is not 1929 and the U.S. is no longer on the gold standard. We almost know for certain what would happen because it already happened in 2008. The Fed (central bank) will create trillions of dollars out of nothing and go on a buying spree, the government will make massive bail-outs, Keynesian economists will provide cover for the whole operation and prices of everything (including bitcoin) will go up. It's not speculation. It's history. The fact that they got away with it is what guarantees that they will do it again. There was plenty of printing of unbacked paper money during the great depression as well. This is what lead to the confiscation of private gold stocks followed by the revaluation of the gold standard from $22 to $35 per ounce in 1933. Leaving the gold standard just makes all this crap somewhat less of a fraud than pretending that we actually operated as if we were on a gold standard. In short, we are both correct. The deflationary events can, and have so far since 2008, outpace the rate at which the Federal Reserve bank is willing to debase the dollar despite tehir willingess to do quite a bit of it. Keep in mind that the Federal Reserve serves the member banks, not the US government nor particular politcos. If they debase too fast, the public will lose trust in the value of the US dollar, and then a hyperinflationary death of the currrency will bring a rapid end to their 100 year long con game. The bankers will never do this unless forced into it by politics, because hyperinflation is always and everywhere triggered by a political event. |
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
|
Sindelar1938
|
|
February 12, 2014, 04:28:21 AM |
|
Probably very positive for bitcoin
But econ theory is no guide
|
|
|
|
|
Le Happy Merchant
|
|
February 12, 2014, 04:38:44 AM |
|
The trade price in US dollars would likely go down as the buying power of the dollar increased, but the actual buying power of those same bitcoins wouldn't likely be significantly effected in the same way. Keep in mind that a major stock crash, like the one in 1929 is highly deflationary; as is the destruction of debt. (Debts that turn bad are written off as uncollectable, or discharged in bankruptcy; both events result in the effective reduction of available liquidity, which is deflationary by defintion)
What about an intentionally produced (the FED) inflationary period during a stock market crash. Can't hold cash, can't buy stocks. Bitcoin up. |
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
|
February 12, 2014, 05:08:20 AM |
|
The trade price in US dollars would likely go down as the buying power of the dollar increased, but the actual buying power of those same bitcoins wouldn't likely be significantly effected in the same way. Keep in mind that a major stock crash, like the one in 1929 is highly deflationary; as is the destruction of debt. (Debts that turn bad are written off as uncollectable, or discharged in bankruptcy; both events result in the effective reduction of available liquidity, which is deflationary by defintion)
Of course you are correct, but this is not 1929 and the U.S. is no longer on the gold standard. We almost know for certain what would happen because it already happened in 2008. The Fed (central bank) will create trillions of dollars out of nothing and go on a buying spree, the government will make massive bail-outs, Keynesian economists will provide cover for the whole operation and prices of everything (including bitcoin) will go up. It's not speculation. It's history. The fact that they got away with it is what guarantees that they will do it again. There was plenty of printing of unbacked paper money during the great depression as well. This is what lead to the confiscation of private gold stocks followed by the revaluation of the gold standard from $22 to $35 per ounce in 1933. Leaving the gold standard just makes all this crap somewhat less of a fraud than pretending that we actually operated as if we were on a gold standard. In short, we are both correct. The deflationary events can, and have so far since 2008, outpace the rate at which the Federal Reserve bank is willing to debase the dollar despite tehir willingess to do quite a bit of it. Keep in mind that the Federal Reserve serves the member banks, not the US government nor particular politcos. If they debase too fast, the public will lose trust in the value of the US dollar, and then a hyperinflationary death of the currrency will bring a rapid end to their 100 year long con game. The bankers will never do this unless forced into it by politics, because hyperinflation is always and everywhere triggered by a political event. I largely agree with you, but politics is overwhelmingly in the direction of easy money. And it will be printed. Inflation will be kept in check by lowering commodity prices as the emerging markets sink back into the third world, consuming less commodities as they do so, but when the Eurozone and other trading partners ramp up their own printing presses, American exporters will clamor for the Fed to do likewise. American debtors, which is most of the public, will want to keep interest rates near zero and the government, the biggest debtor of all, will be happy to agree. Even the banks will scream for more printing as their debtors default and the value of their collateral crashes. The possibility of bank runs will terrify them-Just like in 2008. Injecting liquidity is the only way to prolong the inevitable collapse of an insolvent system. But I really don't think it will be Americans who will most need an inflation hedge. The dollar is shitty, but among national currencies, it's the leper with the most toes. |
insert coin here:
Dash XfXZL8WL18zzNhaAqWqEziX2bUvyJbrC8s
1Ctd7Na8qE7btyueEshAJF5C7ZqFWH11Wc
|
|
|
chessnut
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 12, 2014, 05:09:16 AM |
|
Nothing. No one gun-shy about stock volatility is going to find the volatility of BTC comforting.
in the long run, bitcoin prices are forecast to increase, in the long run, stock price are forecast to decrease. I think that there are many investors out there that might prefer that kind of volatility, cos the stock market is going to get ugly as hell. |
|
|
|
|
