""one size fits all"" method of regulation, constructed with a nod for universality, or should locales adopt tailored, case specific regulation?
One pattern of regulation will definitely not fit in all circumstances or to every country. So each country will have to evolve there own regulation to better suit her environment, citizens and investors.
While there is a large variance in how locales has approached the issue of regulation, the hallmarks of traditional finance (KYC/AML) have started to emerge in all locales where the legitimate regulation of crypto is taking place.
My question is, is KYC/AML the regulation that is talked about or expected? I just think this is not strict enough to be regarded as regulation.