Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 01:28:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Hyperthreading better, neutral, or worse for scrypt calculations?  (Read 1590 times)
ripper234 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2011, 12:36:24 AM
 #1

To get optimal performance, should one turn hyperthreading on or off?

One advantage of HT is that if I want to not run all my cores, because I'm using the computer, and I don't trust that putting the process on "Low Priority" is good enough, then with HT I can mine with 7/8 "cores", while without it I have to choose between 3/4 and 4/4.

Raw performance wise, how does HT affect mining speed?
LiteCoin is right around the corner.

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
1714051721
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714051721

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714051721
Reply with quote  #2

1714051721
Report to moderator
1714051721
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714051721

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714051721
Reply with quote  #2

1714051721
Report to moderator
1714051721
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714051721

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714051721
Reply with quote  #2

1714051721
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714051721
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714051721

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714051721
Reply with quote  #2

1714051721
Report to moderator
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 12, 2011, 12:40:56 AM
 #2

Interested in this as well.
Bobnova
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 12, 2011, 01:29:51 AM
 #3

In linux64 on a 2600k with default compiling options, HT doesn't help or hurts performance.
In linux64 on a 2600k with AVX enabled in compilation of the client, HT helps significantly.

BTC:  1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
grod
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 12, 2011, 01:31:34 AM
 #4

i7 920 on linux64, -march=native -O3 -msse4.2:  HT yields 1% more hash at a cost of about 3 degrees more per core.
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 12, 2011, 01:48:41 AM
 #5

In linux64 on a 2600k with default compiling options, HT doesn't help or hurts performance.
In linux64 on a 2600k with AVX enabled in compilation of the client, HT helps significantly.

Can you please tell us your compile options and your khash/s. Thanks !
panerai
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 12, 2011, 01:55:29 AM
 #6

I'm a Windows guy. Not sure if you guys can help me with HT also. I wish there was a list of minerd switches I can play with
Bobnova
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 12, 2011, 01:56:24 AM
 #7

They're already in the TBX and "what speed are you mining TBX?" threads Bula.

BTC:  1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!