House of Cards BTC

[BittBurger]

as for the feds, that's a chicken dinner -- "winner, winner, chicken dinner!"  buy those newspapers or mags and sell them for substantially more than purchase price if the headline is just right, on a widely read paper ie: NYT.

Not clear why you think that headline would pull collector interest in the future.  Can you clarify?
Newspaper headlines that tend to pull a lot of investor / collector interest and actually go for something worth mentioning, are the epic ones.
Like for example an original copy of "The Times" front page article mentioned by Satoshi in the first blockchain transaction.

-B-

[1715646937]

1715646937

[1715646937]

1715646937

[1715646937]

1715646937

[guybrushthreepwood]

Just started to watch season 1 of this show, really getting into it!  Nice to see the bitcoin mention, even if it's for something negative like laundering.

I guess they were just trying to portray it as the seedy currency of the darknet which was relevant to the story, and I guess it is true technically. I'm sure we'll get some positive coverage in the near future on TV programs as Bitcoin is already moving away from that image.

[exstasie]

I think this is probably one of the most popular shows that has mentioned BTC, receiving many many nominations.  |Great to see regardless if its positive or negative!

[thms]

any youtube videos of the scene?

[guybrushthreepwood]

any youtube videos of the scene?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwTkALQyZes

[barista]

Bitcoin's finally going mainstream and it's just awesome to see.

[guybrushthreepwood]

Bitcoin's finally going mainstream and it's just awesome to see.

A few slight and shady mentions on TV shows isn't exactly going mainstream lol. Massive merchants accepting Bitcoin is going mainstream.

[vpitcher07]

Bitcoin's finally going mainstream and it's just awesome to see.

A few slight and shady mentions on TV shows isn't exactly going mainstream lol. Massive merchants accepting Bitcoin is going mainstream.

I think a good way to look at it is this: Bad publicity is ALWAYS better than no publicity. I hate to say it but look at someone like Justin Beiber. He's hated by a shit load of people yet he has more money than all of us combined (most likely).

[MakeBelieve]

I might just watch this program now that they have mentioned Bitcoin even if it is negative.

[CtrlAltBernanke420]

Just finished Episode 2 of season 2 of house of cards and "Bitcoin laundering" was mentioned in the episode. It's pretty crazy how for Bitcoin has come for it to be mentioned in TV shows now.

Mentioned here already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466609.0

I mentioned this on Jan 5 2014... I'd been talking about bitcoin and house of cards for months now..

House of Cards would be a great venue. All it takes it a Bitmillionaire to pay someone over at Netflix or the director.

[Biomech]

The question is what is the % of mentions positive vs. negative?  I'd say the vast majority are negative ($ laundering, drug sales etc.)

I'm with Phinneas Taylor Barnum on this one. Especially in the early stages. There is no such thing as negative publicity.

[hilariousandco]

The question is what is the % of mentions positive vs. negative?  I'd say the vast majority are negative ($ laundering, drug sales etc.)

I'm with Phinneas Taylor Barnum on this one. Especially in the early stages. There is no such thing as negative publicity.

They only mentioned it the once and with nefarious and sinister connotations.

Seems like you have this guy to thank for the inclusion: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/18/house-of-cards-season-two-hacker-gregg-housh

[keithers]

Just finished the entire season...sucks that it will probably be another year before there is another episode.   Double edged sword having the whole season drop on 1 day.   I like being able to watch the shows back to back, but you can get through it all in a few days, and then there is too much waiting!