ICO Project

[cruelmes]

Guys i know project make ico to colect money for their project right?  my question is why some project didnt do ico?  even if they ddnt need money from investor did u think if that still good to make ico to colect fund for marketing / promotion or partner for example

[1714679230]

1714679230

[1714679230]

1714679230

[1714679230]

1714679230

[1714679230]

1714679230

[1714679230]

1714679230

[1714679230]

1714679230

[prechi]

Yeah, you are right that it is good to conduct ICOs in order to raise funds because that will also tell how serious the project is. EOS is one of the most successful ICO project in 2017 after it raised over $4B. With that, the EOS project has scored itself some good reputation.

[gabrielkings]

Projects conducting ICO are as a result of raising funds so as to sustain the platform.. You are right, not all projects conduct ICO some just go ahaed and conduct private sales and if they hit their target, they see no need conducting an ICO.

[SaepulMT]

Of course the Project must go through ICO to raise funds from investors to make it sufficient, I think projects without ICO or funds from investors are difficult to do because there must be a lot of own capital, so there are also projects without ICO or raising funds from investors who have achieved it, but the possibility small success

[priscadavids]

Yeah, you are right that it is good to conduct ICOs in order to raise funds because that will also tell how serious the project is. EOS is one of the most successful ICO project in 2017 after it raised over $4B. With that, the EOS project has scored itself some good reputation.

Wow... that is really great so within 2017 and now the EOS project found its way to top 10 in the coin market cap. That is interesting... I believe it should be a good project to look into and invest. I read they have steem 2.0 coming. It'll be great to get in.

[MazCrypto]

all back to the project team, they were the ones who knew about the success of the project being developed, I think the project that did not do ico was a project that did not need a lot of money so it could be borne by itself, while the ico project was a big project that needed a lot of money so it needed investors and bounty hunter campaigns

[Adunni6758]

If a project does not take money from investors before lunching into the market, then it is not an ICO, rather it could be called another name. Some of them do airdrop.