Why this marked as "unhandled"?

[vphasitha01]

I have found this j.member(junk member) spreading his/ her refferel link all over the boards and even bumping threads within the same day. I have reported  a post from this user. One of my report also still marked as unhadled which i believed the one of this user that I reported. This is the second time(one is already marked as bad by mistake of mods). When I'm reporting low value/ spam posts are marked as good within few minutes. Why the Mods are some kind of inactive mode when someone is reporting the posts which include refferel links. My believe is, it's clear cut case according to the forum moderation policy. So why unhandled

Link>>>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1035975

Note : I always likes to see reports to be marked as good since I got 99% accuracy.

[1714022615]

1714022615

[1714022615]

1714022615

[1714022615]

1714022615

[seoincorporation]

I have found this j.member(junk member) spreading his/ her refferel link all over the boards and even bumping threads within the same day. I have reported  a post from this user. One of my report also still marked as unhadled which i believed the one of this user that I reported. This is the second time(one is already marked as bad by mistake of mods). When I'm reporting low value/ spam posts are marked as good within few minutes. Why the Mods are some kind of inactive mode when someone is reporting the posts which include refferel links. My believe is, it's clear cut case according to the forum moderation policy. So why unhadled

Link>>>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1035975

Note : I always likes to see reports to be marked as good since I got 99% accuracy.

well, because mods are busy and haven`t take a look already to the report. The "unhandled" number will decrease as soon as they take some action.

[LoyceV]

I think "unhandled" can also mean the post was deleted already before seeing your report.

Anyway, he's spamming his ref link in Dutch, English and Russian. Could be Google Translate, which isn't allowed.
Just to be sure, I'll report the 7 posts that still have referal spam.

[vphasitha01]

well, because mods are busy and haven`t take a look already to the report. The "unhandled" number will decrease as soon as they take some action.

That's exactly what I'm highlighting. If refferel link involved in a report, mods are not looking at those reports and save it for another time. But other low value/spam posts like "Good project", "great project" are marked good within few minutes. What I'm thinking is those two scenarios to be considered as similer situations since both violate the forum rules. We can say it by just looking at ref link only. No rocket science for further study.

Sometimes those unhadled can be marked as bad as well. I have experience, that one of my report has been marked as bad.(actually it isn't bad)

[seoincorporation]

well, because mods are busy and haven`t take a look already to the report. The "unhandled" number will decrease as soon as they take some action.

That's exactly what I'm highlighting. If refferel link involved in a report, mods are not looking at those reports and save it for another time. But other low value/spam posts like "Good project", "great project" are marked good within few minutes. What I'm thinking is those two scenarios to be considered as similer situations since both violate the forum rules. We can say it by just looking at ref link only. No rocket science for further study.

Sometimes those unhadled can be marked as bad as well. I have experience, that one of my report has been marked as bad.(actually it isn't bad)

I have had some similar experiences, but you know, mods are humans too. I suspect mostly the deleted posts you are talking about come from the patrol page, and they are erased/trashed or banned fast.
As I told you once, do not take it too personally, continue reporting and do not care too much for your accuracy, if you think a post should be reported, then report it, but do not get obsessed with the result.

[TryNinja]

I think "unhandled" can also mean the post was deleted already before seeing your report.

~

Isn't the title of the post marked like this when the post gets deleted? I went through the user's post history and the ref link spam is still there.

BTW, I also received a few "bad" reports even that the post got deleted and it was the typical "good project" one-liner spam (not really an issue at the end of the day).
Edit: just checked his profile again and the posts are gone.

[hilariousandco]

Thank you for bringing this very urgent matter to our attention. Ref links are truly one of the greatest evils on the forum and should be removed immediately without fail.
You really don't need to create a thread after your report hasn't been handled after five minutes.

[seoincorporation]

Thank you for bringing this very urgent matter to our attention. Ref links are truly one of the greatest evils on the forum and should be removed immediately without fail.
You really don't need to create a thread after your report hasn't been handled after five minutes.

Yep I actually had reported this guy too. He seems to be sharing his referral all over the forum. Has he been banned for that?

[LoyceV]

BTW, I also received a few "bad" reports even that the post got deleted

I've seen that too. I can imagine Mods make mistakes too, and some of my "69 bad" reports were probably not that bad. But in the end, it doesn't matter.
Have you noticed the percentage is very optimistic? I think 98.01% is rounded up to 99%. So that makes up for a few reports accidentally marked as bad.

Has he been banned for that?

CTRL-F his userID in modlog: no(t yet).

[vphasitha01]

I think "unhandled" can also mean the post was deleted already before seeing your report.

Yeah now it's gone. But at the end of the day Mods didn't give the benefit of the doubt to the user who reported, but will be marked as bad .
Can we add another word like "dab"(deleted already before you report) instead of "bad" for this kind of scenarios

[seoincorporation]

CTRL-F his userID in modlog: no(t yet).

Jajajaja I can`t believe I didn`t know that already. Thanks for the information!!! Every day we learn something new!

Also, there was a good suggestion a couple of days ago, about changing the profiles of those banned so their status will appear under their name. It seems like a very useful tool needing to be implemented in order to avoid "resuscitation" of useless posts...

[vphasitha01]

Thank you for bringing this very urgent matter to our attention. Ref links are truly one of the greatest evils on the forum and should be removed immediately without fail.
You really don't need to create a thread after your report hasn't been handled after five minutes.

I got your massage and I won't do it again. BTW I couldn't knowing about the CTRL -F feature in mod log( thanks to LoyceV) if I didn't create this thread. Let's see the Bright side

[Manhenro]

@OP try to edit the post and correct the word "unhadled" to unhandled, I had to read this post because I was trying to decipher the meaning of the word "unhadled".

[vphasitha01]

@OP try to edit the post and correct the word "unhadled" to unhandled, I had to read this post because I was trying to decipher the meaning of the word "unhadled".

Thanks for pointing out my mistake(we all are humans) and I corrected the word. I will lock the thread since I got my answers