(OMG - this is not a post about merit!  This is a post about Activity and Trust as well)   


I believe the three main pillars of a bitcointalk profile are Merit, Activity and Trust (MAT). 

Since I already rank everyone based on those attributes, I thought I would make a new attribute and call it "Recognition".

Everyone is scored 1-1000 for each pillar.  If you are not ranked you are scored 1000.  The totals are added up, and divided by three.

The result, a number from 1 to 1000 (lower is better), is your average ranking in this community - according to these three pillars anyway.  Personally, I was quite stunned at the results.  :/

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostrecognized

I am faceless. No one can recognize me like a fly on the wall.

Interesting to see the first non legendary at 132. Again with activity being a factor it's no surprise. I didn't recognize most of the names but the ones that stood out were escrows, campaign managers, and very active sellers.

Pretty neat metric to look at. First time I checked out your site. Nice to get a different style topic rolling in meta

Editted

Idk if this is an issue or not, I don't see a lot of names,after doing Ctrl+F,like say hilariousetc or HCP and the highest rank I see is 921 ?

Interestingly at least 725 members that are most "recognized" are Legendary members.

Vod, the new site looks pretty cool and is user friendly. Nice job.

Yay I beat Jet Cash! (actually didn't expect my name to be on that list though)...

This is quite interesting to see how all of the staff are near the top but aren't all there (and cyrus also isn't taking the number 2 slot as I'd expect).


I'm guessing this is due to both the activity and merit parts. And also, you're more likely to gain trust if you're here for a longer amount of time.

In person, if someone sees you often enough and gets to know you then you start to be able to trust them and it's similar with the online world. If you see someone continuously here and posting well then you'll begin to trust them also (I think) - especially with individual interactions with people.

---

@Vod if this list gets reupdated continuously, it'll be interesting to see how much it'll change in the coming months - maybe we could get a monthly snapshot on an archive site as a comparison?

Great feature, but there's something wrong with the list.
Positions in the left column does not correspond to the those in the right column. See below.
https://imgur.com/gallery/fqWXO2X

That's not really even that much trust..

Is Vod's code biased towards trust from Theymos?
It also counts untrusted feedback? Counts age beyond 10 months?
Or just a glitch..

there was a typo:
Thank you to jackg and iasenko for techincal troubleshooting.  (https://bpip.org/sponsor.aspx > Donations to the Project )

That would be fun. Sort of like a ‘How well do you know Bitcointalk’ quiz.

I don't accept this to be correct, people can game, merit, trust and activity, we even have 2 well-known trust farmers/abusers here.

I am surprised that nullius isn't there but this guy(newbie) is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=95463. nullius has more activity, same trust(sort of), and more merit than him. Vod did you take potential activity into count?