Anders, did you even read anything past "just one"? Clearly not since you keep talking about communism like it belongs in this thread. Besides, wouldn't paying an ASIC miner more than a CPU miner (which has already been explained twice) be the exact opposite of how communism works?
Keep your narrow-minded trolling to yourself less you have something constructive to add; like giving me a reason why merging the available hash algorithms to output a single coin is impossible. Else, go back to making your shit apple wallet for your shit ios.
Lol! I am trolling? I'll ignore your insults for now.
You are correct - paying miners unequally wouldn't be considered communism. The rest isn't far from it though.
Crypto-protocols that aren't merged mining compatible cannot be merge mined.. Simple as that. Look it up.
If some people pay 2$ in electricity costs to mine 1$ and others 10 cents it wouldn't make sense. You need a single protocol. The factoring would quickly turn out of whack too - as we've seen with ASICS the market quickly adapts.
So far you have no way of controlling the value of "Crypto" and no adoption strategy that has a chance - except maybe putting a gun to everyone's head... In that case I believe people prefer bankers, governments and maybe the more obvious choice: Bitcoin and a real free market where the price of things reflect the value of a product and the value of the currency.