In the absence of a recognized sole leader, Bitcoiners refer to founding documents and first forum posts to attempt to decipher what Satoshi truly wanted for the currency.
I don't know how Satoshi's "As a leader" presence affects the currency?
If Satoshi returns and makes changes, there is nothing the community should accept.
- The idea of creating a Bitcoin is decentralized, so the absence of a leader is a factor of strength.
- The source of the conflict is due to the high price because many people have entered/used bitcoin as a way to make more money than those who joined it in its early days.
Isolated and Incompatible Visions
Carter and Hasufly’s research breaks Bitcoin narratives down into seven sections which include:
As I mentioned, the multiplicity of the definition is due to the change of those interested in
bitcointalk "online users."
Most newbie accounts want a currency that is easy to exchange & cheap fees even if they abandon decentralization, unlike old members such as Amir Taaki.