Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 04:06:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Accepted share rate different on different pools?  (Read 955 times)
kislam (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 16, 2011, 02:39:18 PM
 #1

Hi all,

Is it ok to have different rate of accepted shares while mining different pools? I am using exact same miner (phoenix with phatk2) with exact same hash rate on 5830, but getting different number of accepted shares from different pools (currently comparing slush, arsbitoin and bitcoins.lc) over a fixed period of time (say 2 hours at a stretch).

Is this normal? Does this have anything to do with the fact that all these pools have different aggregate hashrates?

1PMHA7hyqqbcCbjMfwvKT4xEZ81EYasJze
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715616416
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715616416

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715616416
Reply with quote  #2

1715616416
Report to moderator
1715616416
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715616416

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715616416
Reply with quote  #2

1715616416
Report to moderator
pooler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 838
Merit: 507


View Profile
October 16, 2011, 03:14:21 PM
 #2

The discovery of shares is subject to probability just like the discovery of blocks, so that's normal.
You may even get wildly different numbers across different pools if they use different difficulties for shares.

BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
322i0n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 101


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2011, 03:37:07 PM
 #3

if you keep going with this, checking your shares and checking your payments for a given number of shares, you will find that there are some consistent differences and that some pools are much more "lucky" and generous than others.

Supporting The Global Insurrection Against Banker Occupation
BTC: 1C1w6t1dMkEXeCntURxDiBiWsTbdJbvTr9
NMC: N6uNpVPAdpTur4Hwr8Sqgd6kxcKPto4S2T
pooler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 838
Merit: 507


View Profile
October 16, 2011, 04:34:53 PM
 #4

Yes, but it should be made clear that luck varies with time, so it should not be used as a criterion for choosing a pool.

BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
322i0n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 101


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2011, 05:11:58 PM
 #5

i put luck in quotations. i am suggesting that some pools have consistently worse "luck".

my point is to keep on testing the pools until you find the honest and generous ones. 



Supporting The Global Insurrection Against Banker Occupation
BTC: 1C1w6t1dMkEXeCntURxDiBiWsTbdJbvTr9
NMC: N6uNpVPAdpTur4Hwr8Sqgd6kxcKPto4S2T
kislam (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 17, 2011, 05:03:39 AM
 #6

i put luck in quotations. i am suggesting that some pools have consistently worse "luck".

my point is to keep on testing the pools until you find the honest and generous ones. 




To be frank, i have been feeling that way too, that's why i am mining at 3 pools right now. can you please share your experience about which pools you have found to be "lucky" and generous?

1PMHA7hyqqbcCbjMfwvKT4xEZ81EYasJze
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!