Lauda, MinerJones, Blazed | Missing escrow funds

[vlom]

i found two post about the movement of the coins or the change of the address.

Informational: BTC funds have been moved to a new address using the same setup as before. The new address is: 3QV4kZtdzE8S2XdYXMbYQrgaJYBfDnypCC.

Informational: BTC funds have been moved to a new address using the same setup as before. The new address is: 3QV4kZtdzE8S2XdYXMbYQrgaJYBfDnypCC.

New Address: 354jirex7gkFxMiNmN45SxyMxSUsdGcrsf. Funds should not be moving any more after this.

[1714052499]

1714052499

[1714052499]

1714052499

[1714052499]

1714052499

[1714052499]

1714052499

[4x4et]

Well well well, BitcoinTalk staff accused of stealing.

Trusted members giving each other negative reps.

This place is falling apart lol.

Giving your coins to anybody here (escrow) equals digital suicide + sad violin sounds.

edit: and cause of this post I got another negative rep from another BitcoinTalk staff scammer

LOL, u think this will hurt me?

your shitty forum is dead

[OgNasty]

Well well well, BitcoinTalk staff accused of stealing.

I don’t believe anyone is accusing Bitcointalk staff of stealing.

[Chris!]

Well well well, BitcoinTalk staff accused of stealing.

I don’t believe anyone is accusing Bitcointalk staff of stealing.

They think Lauda is still a mod lol. I guess they missed the news.

I got my 45% refund in case anyone was questioning whether refund were done properly or not.

[Quickseller]

I got my 45% refund in case anyone was questioning whether refund were done properly or not.

If you only got 45%, it sounds like the refund was in fact not done properly...

[vlom]

I got my 45% refund in case anyone was questioning whether refund were done properly or not.

If you only got 45%, it sounds like the refund was in fact not done properly...

its hopeless. i think we will never find out. and there are only a few people that think that it was not OK what happened....

if you read the first posts in the ANN that lauda wrote i looks like lauda was part of the team. but maybe lauda was just posting because lauda wanted a lot of people to take part in the ICO to get more money.

[Lauda]

if you read the first posts in the ANN that lauda wrote i looks like lauda was part of the team.

Which is nothing other but absolute nonsense.

[vlom]

if you read the first posts in the ANN that lauda wrote i looks like lauda was part of the team.

Which is nothing other but absolute nonsense.

you helped people with all the questions they had. you explained how the ico works and how to sweep tokens etc pp. but after the ico was over you just write that everything is not our business.

i dont say that you were or are part of the team. but that you had a motivation to help people. because the more money went into ICO the more money the escrows received. and this is a fact. shall i quote the posts i am talking about?

[Lauda]

if you read the first posts in the ANN that lauda wrote i looks like lauda was part of the team.

Which is nothing other but absolute nonsense.

you helped people with all the questions they had. you explained how the ico works and how to sweep tokens etc pp. but after the ico was over you just write that everything is not our business.

i dont say that you were or are part of the team. but that you had a motivation to help people. because the more money went into ICO the more money the escrows received. and this is a fact. shall i quote the posts i am talking about?

I see that we've moved onto 'Lauda helping people is bad'. What is next?

[vlom]

if you read the first posts in the ANN that lauda wrote i looks like lauda was part of the team.

Which is nothing other but absolute nonsense.

you helped people with all the questions they had. you explained how the ico works and how to sweep tokens etc pp. but after the ico was over you just write that everything is not our business.

i dont say that you were or are part of the team. but that you had a motivation to help people. because the more money went into ICO the more money the escrows received. and this is a fact. shall i quote the posts i am talking about?

I see that we've moved onto 'Lauda helping people is bad'. What is next?

i did not say that this is or was bad. all i wanted to say: i have the feeling that you are helpful as long as you will profit. but after you got your share your posts changed.

whatever. I will not give up, but I do not want to discuss it here anymore

[iluvbitcoins]

http://prntscr.com/kyi5dn

Lauda has recently changed his e-mail address.

He also responded to my PM on English, although he spoke Croatian before?

http://prntscr.com/kyi6lr

[vlom]

http://prntscr.com/kyi5dn

Lauda has recently changed his e-mail address.

He also responded to my PM on English, although he spoke Croatian before?

http://prntscr.com/kyi6lr

i just quote this that it is quoted. nothing more. everybody shall make his/her own conclusion.

[wizcoin]

Isn't ironic when someone is accusing you about scam, you'll give him/her neg tag instead of defending your self.

[Quickseller]

Isn't ironic when someone is accusing you about scam, you'll give him/her neg tag instead of defending your self.

This happens quite frequently with one of these parties. Unfortunately, in this case, the accusation is quite credible, yet those in power have scared anyone from seriously caring...

[escrow.ms]

Didn't expected this from you Lauda. I wonder where are those people now who got me removed from default trust, ganged up on me when I came back. I have gotten arrested for something I never did but atleast I didn't had a single person who can claim I took a penny from him.
Shame on you.

[Quickseller]

Didn't expected this from you Lauda. I wonder where are those people now who got me removed from default trust, ganged up on me when I came back. I have gotten arrested for something I never did but atleast I didn't had a single person who can claim I took a penny from him.
Shame on you.

It seems that group of people almost entirely have their fingerprints on DT and many of them have acted unethically at best and illegally at worst. Calls for them to be removed have been ignored.

[allahabadi]

Didn't expected this from you Lauda. I wonder where are those people now who got me removed from default trust, ganged up on me when I came back. I have gotten arrested for something I never did but atleast I didn't had a single person who can claim I took a penny from him.
Shame on you.

Why wonder when you can go and check their accounts ?

See if they are online. Start sending them messages and see if they respond.

BTW did u see who has Lauda on DT2 and tried contacting them ?

[BTCforJoe]

http://prntscr.com/kyi5dn

Lauda has recently changed his e-mail address.

He also responded to my PM on English, although he spoke Croatian before?

http://prntscr.com/kyi6lr

Just returned to the forums after a 2-week hiatus. Are there any threads where Lauda explains the purpose of these recent changes to their forum account? Link please.

And after reviewing the past couple of pages that I needed to catch up on, I just want to state some unbiased input:

As defined by Merriam Webster dictionary, escrow means a deed, a bond, money, or a piece of property held in trust by a third party to be turned over to the grantee only upon fulfillment of a condition.

Based on the terms that were (irresponsibly) set and dictated by the board of NVO, it seems as if the services of the escrows involved were completed according to the terms that were established by the parties involved. The accusations brought forth in this thread are that the escrows were acting in their best interest to imply theft of a portion of the escrowed funds. However, to me (and I hope that it doesn't appear I'm taking sides), it appears that no terms of the original agreement were broken by the escrow(s).

Does that mean that they didn't profit from their holdings? No; I'm sure that they probably did. Is this morally wrong? That's for you to decide, but to me, a responsible escrow is one that fulfills the terms as brought forth upon them at the time the escrow is opened.

In this particular instance, I find most of the fault for this whole ordeal to be due to the shitty unthought terms that were established by NVO.

Anyways, my main reason for this post was to see if there is anyone that can point me to the reason for the changes in Lauda's account lol. Just thought I'd add some input, too.

Carry on.

[bradock]

remove lauda from escrow listing services until this problem fix. pls dont let other people down by loosing their money. staffs should take action on this. there is other thread also about lauda escrow.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5053593.0
yesterday im almost use lauda services but the seller said to me he dont trust lauda, im fee lucky my deal smooth thru bitify or MAYBE i will have the same problem too

[ibminer]

Are there any threads where Lauda explains the purpose of these recent changes to their forum account? Link please.

This is the best explanation I've seen so far: 

Didn't you say you changed the email?

I did change it. What about it?

Them's fightin' words!