Forum Abuse Reports

[Hexah]

Accounts connected:
Lieldoryn, Lancusters, Palmerson, Proton2233, Lampaster, Kronos21, warrior333, Basmic and matuson

BTC addresses:

Code:

374Wfo9kLKkc1vxzifqGiqcqH55KbGuuPx
3QQXvjuPHYkfaDis5354PBQR7AbA9duKcz
3M5vCnvWYVT6v7g57TRa1x8ZH7eAc8GuGB
3HDWQDS82Hnz7oCQBKRzuutiDqmZoXrp6c
34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89
3Mp8nz913V9YJGWfd4SD6E51jB4XYLD7uK
3NcnXBrvmG6tWKjqFwizkJw2a6jWBA5znk
3HXNrUxVcB6WQ8V5iuHrhKg188br8L6pyr
36TeFLUM41JJ45oGJbvqNT7kdfdMcs2oYs

The individual who uses this account highly maintain and uses different addresses but as far as I get through on his sending history it has the same address/es and some are clearly evident because of their time logs that I will share below this post. Hoping DT members will get through on every proofs and some archives that I'll share.

Proofs and archives:

1. Archives

http://archive.is/gvW4i#30% | http://archive.is/QzTAA#40%


Proofs and screenshots:

This is the one that leads with this report you can see that Lieldoryn has been merited by Lampaster and Palmerson (seems legit).




Now let's get through on their addresses and image proofs:


Here you'll notice that Lieldoryn, Palmerson and Lampaster's btc address ( 374Wfo9kLKkc1vxzifqGiqcqH55KbGuuPx, 3M5vCnvWYVT6v7g57TRa1x8ZH7eAc8GuGB, and 34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89 ) have same time log when they have sent some btc to the address 3C4ABC7iPcAAKBh6SJXfvUSDBew3abCtw3 and the other address you can find on the screenshot.






In this image you can see that Lampaster and Kronos btc address has same time log and same address used and sent out btc to 3C4ABC7iPcAAKBh6SJXfvUSDBew3abCtw3 (I guess same too on the screenshots above)





In this image you can see that Lampaster and warrior333 btc address has same time log and same address used and sent out btc to 3PbacVZwS2L5i9C2Cmz9rPu8s4qjyYkufk and 3CgQeSxqroG8obuiMwFQpZCzSBuhW4FDAP namely.





In this image you can see that Palmerson, Basmic and matuson btc address has same time log and same address used sent out btc to 37Kbnc7dkB8AiqGfGHgeqKkgd3C65EwqE9






In this image you can see that Lampaster and Lancuster btc address has no same time log but they use same address and sent out btc to 33jhmQXe4Q9dP24Jm9EVa6XHxn85sZnQMR  but base on both of their account name I guess it could be valid base on on the rhyme factor.





In this image you can see that Proton2233 and matuson btc address has only 168 seconds gap between the transaction and they sent out btc to 3NSAY3HF6Afd4KyEoYUiQdkJFLfr4E7ubj





EDIT: Palmerson has merited Lancuster in this post.
http://archive.is/uM9rS#10%




User matuson, Lampaster, Proton223, and Palmerson has short gaps only when they have been created by May 11, 2017. User Basmic and warrior2233 has only a 3 minutes gap when it was created May 10, 2017. The other three has different date registry.

As you can see matuson, Proton2233, Lancusters, warrior333 and Basmic was last active by July 19, 2018. And base on the accounts by now just 4 of them are active namely Lampaster, Palmerson, (who merited one of the post of Lieldoryn maybe because of merit requirements in the BQT campaign that has been posted on August 10 and by August 12 he/she receives that merit) Lieldoryn and Kronos21.


I guess that should all be fine and hoping those members will be tagged so soon but I agree on due process.

*This will be my thread from now on for reporting forum abuse so that it will not be spammy on Reputation section, take this as a rehab of mine of what did I do based on my red TRUST but that will be my motivation too. Let's keep the forum clean

[1715201895]

1715201895

[Hexah]

My other threads that need to be reviewed:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4883485.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4879397.0


I didn't get the chance to archive the post that he made but surely was able to take a screenshot of it when he hadn't edited it yet.

Account:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1260828

Thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4879947.0

Proof:

[suchmoon]

Here you'll notice that Lieldoryn, Palmerson and Lampaster's btc address ( 374Wfo9kLKkc1vxzifqGiqcqH55KbGuuPx, 3M5vCnvWYVT6v7g57TRa1x8ZH7eAc8GuGB, and 34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89 ) have same time log when they have sent some btc to the address 3C4ABC7iPcAAKBh6SJXfvUSDBew3abCtw3 and the other address you can find on the screenshot.

These are Xapo addresses.

[Hexah]

Okay it was, but on the way it was sent and have same time logs, the way they have synonymous date registry although other 2 haven't, the way that these users are cycling out there merits and the way that Palmerson merited Lieldoryn post on 12th of August because of the merit requirements in the BQT campaign. Right now those account has been waked up from long sleep on July 19 maybe this post has been seen.

And how about this one? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4883870.msg44049439#msg44049439

[suchmoon]

Okay it was, but on the way it was sent and have same time logs

This is a shared wallet. Multiple users deposit to their assigned addresses then some process probably sweeps it to another address. So it's very likely for the timestamps to match but that doesn't prove anything.

, the way they have synonymous date registry although other 2 haven't, the way that these users are cycling out there merits and the way that Palmerson merited Lieldoryn post on 12th of August because of the merit requirements in the BQT campaign. Right now those account has been waked up from long sleep on July 19 maybe this post has been seen.

Sending or receiving merits doesn't prove anything.