Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[Lorin]

You should understand the rules. For example if you join a game there is also a rules that you should follow, if you did not meet that rules you loose. Its just like on signature campaign, we shoukd follow their rules to earn a reward.  Read first their rules and understand.

[1713559188]

1713559188

[1713559188]

1713559188

[1713559188]

1713559188

[1713559188]

1713559188

[1713559188]

1713559188

[tonibyuzen]

In my opinion, you should follow the conditions of participation in the signature campaign without question. If you do not agree with this, then perhaps this work is not for you. But this applies only to the bounty of honest managers. If the conditions change constantly and in the middle of the week, it is possible that such a bounty Manager is simply not trustworthy.

[cribusen]

It depends on each campaign because due to such market situation we are forced to deal with a lot of campaigns that are ending without any payment or with a dramatic budget reduces. Hope things will change soon.

[LDenis555]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Of course it is fair not to reward such people, because they did not fulfill the terms of the contract with the project, but how else is it possible? If we consider the picture in General, then the question arises - what if the company does not fulfill its promises to reward, change the conditions of participation in the bounty of the company? Here everyone acts as he thinks it is right, so the company should not be trusted.

[cryptolord2077]

Over the past 5 months I have not received payments from a single project, they are all moved to the middle - the end of December, and it must be borne in mind that the project will need additional time to get listed to the exchange. I am absolutely not satisfied.

[powerman24]

We have to fulfill the requirements and if they are not met there will be no reward simple as that. If the requirement is weekly 10 posts it means, that is the minimum but you can write 11 or 12 posts for the case if some of your posts is deleted by the forum admin or the whole
tread could be deleted as well.

[bananaunana]

Legit question which bounty managers should consider.  

Best way to reward a signature bounty is also in my opinion giving stakes per post. Like in your example if someone has 9 posts, pay for 9 posts and if someone has 13 posts, pay for 13 posts. But set a maximal limit of 10 or 15 posts per week which are paid, this decision will avoid spam. Pay every post would in this limit would be very fair.  

[Kurokonobasuke]

This year, I am not satisfied with the profiit given as reward for the hardwork of the participants. The worse scenario is having no profit at all this year, from a bounty project due to project failure which is due to the influence of continuous market downfall thid year. Unlike last year, whereas profit are reasonable from bounty projects especiallh during the bullrun. But the case at this moment is way different.

[basyang]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.


If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

In my own opinion, All of Bounty campaign has regulation and has participant we need to follow. Limiting their posts or has a maximum and minimum post to have a basis when they count their participants earning. Having a rules and regulation can be a way to have a piece  mind though we have diffrent opinion.

[mcTether]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I have seen some bounty campaign managers who are very strict with this rules. A participant can even be short of one post yet still receive zero stake, whereas some may just overlook and award you the full stake. This is usually at the sole discretion of the bounty managers to either amend the rules along the line, or keep strictly to it.

[heritage35]

This issue is in the hands of the bounty participant.
Making shit posts can can lead to that. Do it should be stopped.
Then create as many posts as possible, in order not to fall victim again.

[bakermaker123]

If that's the rule, I mean that's the rule. You should just do it too avoid problems. Besides, every one of your post is paid so be diligent.

[Clark05]

It depends to the signature campaign that you join. Because they have campaigns that good to join and not.
Calculate the reward that possible you get before you join to know if that is good or not.

[KingOfWinterfell01]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I would agree with the rules. You have to make the quota or else they won't pay you. That's why you have all week or a lot of days before the cut off to make it. Word of advice, always make sure that you post more than enough of what is asked. The excess won't be rewarded but at least you're sure that you reached the required posts.

[andika2018]

When we decide join in some bounty campaign, we should be agree with their rules. I think its fair bounty manager not giving a stake if we do not follow their rules. Rules should be obey because its about to spread the word on their project. So far, i am very satisfy with my reward

[tomboi]

Not all projects that I follow always produce high and high values. Especially with the prices of the crypto market currently declining. It also has a significant impact on revenue from the signature campaign, tokens are more difficult to sell because the value drops dramatically after distribution or after the coins are listed on the stock. However, taking advantage of this situation is to collect coins from many signature campaigns by keeping them on promising coins, which will create huge revenue opportunities at high market prices.

[indobitcoin.tk]

If everybody is doing the same as doing the job just a few less sure this will give bad impact. rules and regulations still should remain applied to the bounty that is running. It's when these rules are tight then the bounty went well and certainly including bounty that will most likely be able to give more profit.

[amitkumratra]

In every work conditions are very necessary things and bounty hunter's must be obeyed them and i am also satisfied with these rules. And if you can not fulfill conditions then it is not a good thing that you want reward for your uncompleted work.
According to me when any bounty project gives you to do task of writing 10 or 15 post in signature campaign, actually they will hire you to promote their project by writing quality post on forum. And if you does not fulfill the conditions and does not promote them properly, then they have right to disqualify you and also have rights to not given reward for your half work.
So i think conditions are good thing which gives us Induced to do our work properly.

[Jaggi90]

Every bounty campaign has it's own share of every campaign. Sometimes , the Signature share is satisfactory and sometimes not. It all depends on project.

[ndico]

Every bounty has a rule and the rules must be followed strictly to allow the person to get a stake but I think it would be a good idea that bounty managers should award half stake to anyone that reaches half of the post for the week.