|
Bind (OP)
|
 |
October 20, 2011, 04:30:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 20, 2011, 07:22:11 AM |
|
Do you have a transcript?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minsc
|
|
October 20, 2011, 08:20:03 AM |
|
I am on the 5th video. This is some kind of legal trickery where Canada's legal system is based on trust law and if you refuse to identify by your name and use some title, then it breaks.
|
1DcXvfJdeJch9uptKopte5XQarTtj5ZjpL
|
|
|
|
Minsc
|
|
October 21, 2011, 04:35:07 AM |
|
I researched it and I read it's just a fraud thing con artists promote. Anyone know???
|
1DcXvfJdeJch9uptKopte5XQarTtj5ZjpL
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 21, 2011, 06:24:02 AM |
|
I researched it and I read it's just a fraud thing con artists promote. Anyone know???
Wow! You have a lot of spare time on your hands don't you! |
|
|
|
|
|
Bind (OP)
|
|
October 22, 2011, 05:51:41 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minsc
|
|
October 24, 2011, 11:04:04 PM |
|
|
1DcXvfJdeJch9uptKopte5XQarTtj5ZjpL
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
October 24, 2011, 11:18:09 PM |
|
what the hell did I just watch? |
PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0 3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
|
|
|
|
Bind (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2011, 08:34:29 AM |
|
We all have creator-endowed (birth) rights that can not be taken away ... ever.
Although your rights can not be taken away, we can, and do, give them away and/or relinquish them to the state by contract, where they quite happily give us benefits and privilages for fees, taxes, and control in return ... and discipline if we do not follow the rules under which we have contracted our rights away.
To understand this, ask yourself a simple question ...
By what authority (connective tissue) does the government govern you, fine you, arrest you, make you apply for things, make you register for stuff, and license you for activities ?
If you start quoting statutes, then ask yourself by what authority do they require you adhere to statutes ... what makes the statutes apply to you ?
Think long and hard on that one before answering and if you can answer please post a reputable source. To me its all about consent of the governed.
Government never has and never will state that you dont have those rights, because the recognize that you do have them. They just dont want you to know that you ahve them to keep the fraud going, money rolling in, and their slave control structure in place.
By their contracts we agree to, our ignorance, and misconception that we are under obligation to them and their statutes (rules).
Where is it written that we must listen to government when we are only governed by the consent of the governed ?
It does not say consent of SOME of the governed.
It does not state consent of representatives of the governed.
It states by consent of the governed.
... requiring YOUR consent.
FYI Canadian Law and American Law is almost identical, based on English Admiralty Law.
I am still researching this, but so far I have not seen where those videos have been inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 25, 2011, 08:40:22 AM |
|
"We all have creator-endowed (birth) rights that can not be taken away ... ever."
Really? What creator and where does he get these rights from?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bind (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2011, 10:32:26 AM |
|
"We all have creator-endowed (birth) rights that can not be taken away ... ever."
Really? What creator and where does he get these rights from?
whatever or whoever you think created you. we have the right to do anything we damn well please so long as we honor our agreements (in commerce) and do no harm (not infringing on anyone else or their property). its under common law I think. with that we are 100% responsible for ourselves and liable. I do not think you will find one court case where a free sovereign flesh and blood man or woman has been denied the right to do the above when they have not contracted their rights away for benefits and privilages and have asserted their supreme authority over themselves to those who presumed authority over them. Remember the Maxims of Law. A claim or affidavit undisputed becomes judgment in commerse by default of law, thus so long as we have no contract with government and we dispute their authority and jurisdiction, we reign supreme over ourselves and our property ... so long as we infringe on no one else or their property, and honor our agreements. at least I havent been able to find one, and I have been looking everyday. again I am only in the research stage, but I plan on real world application to become completely free after adequate preparation. |
|
|
|
|
Minsc
|
|
October 25, 2011, 10:54:26 AM |
|
Bind, There's laws and rules. Then there's what the courts will actually agree to. Those are two different things. You need to get a high court to rule in favor of freeman philosophy so a legal precedent can be used. Oh and see this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49576 First video is very funny. |
1DcXvfJdeJch9uptKopte5XQarTtj5ZjpL
|
|
|
|
Bind (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2011, 11:22:21 AM
Last edit: October 25, 2011, 11:33:59 AM by Bind |
|
There's laws and rules.
I disagree. I think laws and rules are the exact same thing. We call them statutes, and to be enforceable, there need to be a contract between you and government of some kind. An application, a SS#, a registration, a license, etc, which can all be rescinded, severed, or otherwise removed via remedy, because they are all voluntary. If you doubt that they are voluntary, check the legislation. They cant say you signed this so now we can enslave you for life. Then there's what the courts will actually agree to.
Those are two different things. You need to get a high court to rule in favor of freeman philosophy so a legal precedent can be used.
thats where free flesh and blood sovereigns who go about it right seek and get their remedy. if its not done correctly, you get in more trouble ... but then even with that there is ALWAYS a remedy. They can not deny you remedy from what I understand. the police are the enforcers ... the overseers ... i expect nothing less ... the remedy is in court. there are many successes. I dont like the freeman label .. i like to think of is as standing up for your sovereignty |
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 25, 2011, 11:32:44 AM |
|
"We all have creator-endowed (birth) rights that can not be taken away ... ever."
Really? What creator and where does he get these rights from?
whatever or whoever you think created you. we have the right to do anything we damn well please so long as we honor our agreements (in commerce) and do no harm (not infringing on anyone else or their property). its under common law I think. with that we are 100% responsible for ourselves and liable. I do not think you will find one court case where a free sovereign flesh and blood man or woman has been denied the right to do the above when they have not contracted their rights away for benefits and privilages and have asserted their supreme authority over themselves to those who presumed authority over them. Remember the Maxims of Law. A claim or affidavit undisputed becomes judgment in commerse by default of law, thus so long as we have no contract with government and we dispute their authority and jurisdiction, we reign supreme over ourselves and our property ... so long as we infringe on no one else or their property, and honor our agreements. at least I havent been able to find one, and I have been looking everyday. again I am only in the research stage, but I plan on real world application to become completely free after adequate preparation. It seems you don't know much about common law. Its the king's law - often laid down in courts called the King's Bench. If you accept common law, you accept the sovereignty of the state. If you don't, its enforced anyway as this poor sap found out. http://www.enniscorthyguardian.ie/news/bobby-of-the-family-sludds-may-be-jailed-2875189.html |
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 25, 2011, 11:40:53 AM |
|
...snip...
right, because police never unlawfully intimidate.
for all we know this guy is being intimidated ... the police cant even answer the question of what he';s being charge with or for. For all we know this sovereign never rescinded, severed, or removed himself from existing contracts with the state that allows them to hold statute over his head ... we just do not know. Not enough information to do anything but guess. I see a rational calm man being oppressed and telling the cops they are acting unlawfully.
http://www.enniscorthyguardian.ie/news/bobby-of-the-family-sludds-may-be-jailed-2875189.htmlHe was charged with driving without insurance. He was convicted of it and paid a fine to avoid jail. You really should read the article. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bind (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2011, 11:42:07 AM |
|
...snip...
right, because police never unlawfully intimidate.
for all we know this guy is being intimidated ... the police cant even answer the question of what he';s being charge with or for. For all we know this sovereign never rescinded, severed, or removed himself from existing contracts with the state that allows them to hold statute over his head ... we just do not know. Not enough information to do anything but guess. I see a rational calm man being oppressed and telling the cops they are acting unlawfully.
http://www.enniscorthyguardian.ie/news/bobby-of-the-family-sludds-may-be-jailed-2875189.htmlHe was charged with driving without insurance. He was convicted of it and paid a fine to avoid jail. You really should read the article. yea i posted in the wrong place and deleted my post. I thought this was the thread where they cops were intimidating the sovereign in another thread |
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 25, 2011, 11:44:52 AM |
|
...snip...
right, because police never unlawfully intimidate.
for all we know this guy is being intimidated ... the police cant even answer the question of what he';s being charge with or for. For all we know this sovereign never rescinded, severed, or removed himself from existing contracts with the state that allows them to hold statute over his head ... we just do not know. Not enough information to do anything but guess. I see a rational calm man being oppressed and telling the cops they are acting unlawfully.
http://www.enniscorthyguardian.ie/news/bobby-of-the-family-sludds-may-be-jailed-2875189.htmlHe was charged with driving without insurance. He was convicted of it and paid a fine to avoid jail. You really should read the article. yea i posted in the wrong place and deleted my post. I thought this was the thread where they cops were intimidating the sovereign in another thread  Now your reply makes more sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bind (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2011, 12:02:32 PM |
|
the link is a 503 error for me - i will read it later. |
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 25, 2011, 12:07:43 PM |
|
the link is a 503 error for me - i will read it later. Good old David Icke. If we didn't have such a fine creator of conspiracy theories, we would have to invent him. |
|
|
|
|
|
