closed

[almightyruler]

For those complaining about the withdraw fees: here's the current USD equivalent value of the fixed withdraw fees. They're all over the place...  LTC and BTC cost you $1.60 and $1.58 respectively, while TRC and I0C will cost you 0.009 cents ($0.00009) and 0.002 cents ($0.00002)

ANC - Anoncoin     0.1 (ANC) = $0.16
BTC - Bitcoin      0.002 (BTC) = $1.58
DGC - Digitalcoin  0.2 (DGC)  = $0.04
DOGE - Dogecoin    5.0 (DOGE)  = 0.7 cents
DVC - Devcoin    100.0 (DVC) = $0.03
FRC - Freicoin    10.0 (FRC)  = $0.05
FTC - Feathercoin  0.01 (FTC)   = 0.2 cents
I0C - I0coin       0.01 (I0C)  = 0.002 cents
IXC - Ixcoin       8.0 (IXC)  = $0.02
LTC - Litecoin     0.1 (LTC) = $1.60
NMC - Namecoin     0.1 (NMC) = $0.28
NVC - Novacoin     0.1 (NVC) = $0.25
PPC - Peercoin     0.02 (PPC)  = $0.04
QRK - Quarkcoin    0.5 (QRK)  = 0.5 cents
TRC - Terracoin    0.01 (TRC) = 0.009 cents
WDC - Worldcoin    0.1 (WDC)  = $0.01
XPM - Primecoin    0.01 (XPM) = $0.05

[1713569719]

1713569719

[1713569719]

1713569719

[1713569719]

1713569719

[1713569719]

1713569719

[Ferris419]

What's the possibility of getting PXL added to your exchange ?

[superresistant]

Can't wait for Nxt to be added.

[Sanglotslongs]

Hum 

[navigator]

Your site broke for me, so I converted to doges and remove my coins from the site.

In the picture, my doge and btc balance are backwards, and I have no idea where those bid and ask prices are coming from.

[Planethill]

In the picture, my doge and btc balance are backwards

I just noticed this as well.  It seems the balances are backwards on all the exchanges.  VERY confusing.  I was concerned that instead of selling DOGE I'd be buying more...etc.

[almightyruler]

Hum 

Fair go, looks like it was only just listed today. I can see a 1:1 ratio of buy and sell orders now (20 of each)

Balances are still reversed though, apparently I have 0 BTC but 0.17132144 NXT.......

[rokkyroad]

For those complaining about the withdraw fees: here's the current USD equivalent value of the fixed withdraw fees. They're all over the place...  LTC and BTC cost you $1.60 and $1.58 respectively, while TRC and I0C will cost you 0.009 cents ($0.00009) and 0.002 cents ($0.00002)[/pre]

They do seem to be pretty pricey alright. Did my accounting yesterday and was a little dismayed. Fine selection of coins and all. Has been reliable for me.

Oh well ... getting to be lots of competition with the coins ...e ...ex ...up ...

[BigBobo]

withdrawal bitcoin and other cryptocoins,not working !!fix please!

[Ferris419]

Would love to be able to trade PXL/BTC on your exchange! Could you please consider it? This coin is solid has a good/active dev team has strong community and from day this coin was released it had a purpose and value because it could be used to purchase advertising pixel space. Thanks!!

[disclaimer201]

withdrawal bitcoin and other cryptocoins,not working !!fix please!

working again

[ceric35]

I experienced a nxt withdraw bug last night.

My NXT balance is now 0, but i didn't receive coins.
Checking account history page, the withdraw is listed here, but without any transaction id.

I sent an email to vircurex support last nigth, but not yet received answer

[ltcnim]

i have a question regarding the public api:

is it maybe possible, that the result from trades.json are sent in the opposite order? I think it's pretty strange, that you always get the oldest orders first, and then you will need to resend that request like 100 times, always with the latest tid from the previous request. Or maybe add another parameter so you can choose the order (newest/oldest)?

bump

[ceric35]

I experienced a nxt withdraw bug last night.

My NXT balance is now 0, but i didn't receive coins.
Checking account history page, the withdraw is listed here, but without any transaction id.

I sent an email to vircurex support last nigth, but not yet received answer

Just got an answer. Vircurex support just fixed it.
Amazing support

[BigBobo]

withdrawal bitcoin and other cryptocoins,not working !!fix please!

working again

everything is okay,thank you
good luck to You!

[hashme]

As a VCX shareholder I'm interested when the quarterly report for Q4-2013 will be posted.

[Kumala]

As a VCX shareholder I'm interested when the quarterly report for Q4-2013 will be posted.

Q3 ended end of November, thus Q4 will be end of February.

[Kumala]

i have a question regarding the public api:

is it maybe possible, that the result from trades.json are sent in the opposite order? I think it's pretty strange, that you always get the oldest orders first, and then you will need to resend that request like 100 times, always with the latest tid from the previous request. Or maybe add another parameter so you can choose the order (newest/oldest)?

bump

The behaviour is intentional. Previously we had returned all transactions within the last 7 days. With increasing transaction volume, these API calls were returning up to 1 MB per call, obviously not the most performant way. Therefore we changed it that you should provide the ID of the last transaction that you know and we return all transactions after that ID. To limit resource consumption we return only max. 1000 trades. Thus if there are more than 1000 trades between two of your API calls you will need to call the function repeatedly always with the last ID of each return. This is quite a common approach to withdrawing transaction data from sites that have large transactions.

[Kumala]

While we're talking about the API... the latest announcement mentions an API mailing list. How do I get access to this? It's hard enough to find documentation for the API, but now I discover there's a secret mailing list! 

Point taken, we put up a reference to the existing mailing list on the API web page.

[ltcnim]

i have a question regarding the public api:

is it maybe possible, that the result from trades.json are sent in the opposite order? I think it's pretty strange, that you always get the oldest orders first, and then you will need to resend that request like 100 times, always with the latest tid from the previous request. Or maybe add another parameter so you can choose the order (newest/oldest)?

bump

The behaviour is intentional. Previously we had returned all transactions within the last 7 days. With increasing transaction volume, these API calls were returning up to 1 MB per call, obviously not the most performant way. Therefore we changed it that you should provide the ID of the last transaction that you know and we return all transactions after that ID. To limit resource consumption we return only max. 1000 trades. Thus if there are more than 1000 trades between two of your API calls you will need to call the function repeatedly always with the last ID of each return. This is quite a common approach to withdrawing transaction data from sites that have large transactions.

yes, it's common if you are interested in the transaction history. but if you always just want the latest trades, it will produce a lot of overhead which will increase even more the more transactions are made. For example, if you only need the last 20 trades, you would need to generate some extra requests to the API, instead of just one with just a little response data. But it's of course your choice how to handle it. If you are ok with extra traffic and extra requests, I'm ok with it too ^^

Just a last question: on the API page a 1request/5s is stated. If I start my client for the first time, do I need to wait 5s between each request until I'm up to date with the transactions? I'm pretty sure there are a lot of transactions made in the last 7 days, so that would take quite some time...