Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 03:17:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 425 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 902898 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
November 08, 2011, 03:41:32 PM
 #121

Well, I think quite a few have been waiting for this:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51226.0

The WorkMaker version of PoolServerJ has finally been released by shadders, along with a few other improvements to merged mining performance.  I will begin to testing the merged mining system on Thursday with a few users, and hopefully deploy it for all miners on Saturday.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
1710818241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710818241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710818241
Reply with quote  #2

1710818241
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710818241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710818241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710818241
Reply with quote  #2

1710818241
Report to moderator
1710818241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710818241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710818241
Reply with quote  #2

1710818241
Report to moderator
1710818241
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710818241

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710818241
Reply with quote  #2

1710818241
Report to moderator
dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 08, 2011, 05:06:26 PM
 #122

I would.love to help test it let me know what to connect to

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
sadpandatech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 08, 2011, 06:01:12 PM
 #123

  Any plans to fix the API so it displays the 24h earnings again? They show on acct fine but API view displays 0.

If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA

It is being worked on by smart people.  -DamienBlack
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
November 08, 2011, 07:59:20 PM
 #124

  Any plans to fix the API so it displays the 24h earnings again? They show on acct fine but API view displays 0.

I will fix this later today, I wasn't aware that it was still broken (nobody ever complains about the things I'm not aware of!).  I'll also get the API up for our pool block reporting so projects like pident (well, they're gone, but others will take their place if they haven't already) can accurately grab which pools are solving which blocks.

Aside from these changes and merged mining, does anybody have some feature requests?  I have a nice weekend opened up for my birthday and the coding bug is hitting my pretty hard right now!

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3577
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
November 08, 2011, 08:06:03 PM
 #125

I have a nice weekend opened up for my birthday and the coding bug is hitting my pretty hard right now!

Happy Birthday.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 08, 2011, 08:53:23 PM
 #126

Well done for MM implementation. Now, if you could just lower the fees Grin
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


I heart thebaron


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 01:18:31 AM
 #127

Aside from these changes and merged mining, does anybody have some feature requests?

I really hate to sound like a broken record....BUT, is there still a chance that the Hall of Fame's "user-row"/highlights/private-26th-row will be back ?

I honestly miss this feature, but am very thankfull for all of the other changes that have taken place in the mean time, especially the security hardening Wink

Thanks again for everything,
Allan

ps. Last but not least - How about an Hourly submitted Share count average for each worker ? ...to better monitor performance.....

eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
November 09, 2011, 02:37:07 AM
 #128

Aside from these changes and merged mining, does anybody have some feature requests?

I really hate to sound like a broken record....BUT, is there still a chance that the Hall of Fame's "user-row"/highlights/private-26th-row will be back ?

I honestly miss this feature, but am very thankfull for all of the other changes that have taken place in the mean time, especially the security hardening Wink

Thanks again for everything,
Allan

ps. Last but not least - How about an Hourly submitted Share count average for each worker ? ...to better monitor performance.....

Hall of Fame will be getting a redesign soon to fix the highlights as well as add in Weekly/Monthly charts for the Top Share submissions.

Regarding hourly submitted share average, that's essentially what your performance charts are right now, but converted into MH/s.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
November 09, 2011, 07:28:02 AM
 #129

I have a test server up for merged mining for anybody interested.  It is using the old user/worker database from before the move to PPS, so new users/workers will not be recognized.

You can mine on the test server by using 188.40.44.150:8332/ as the address in your miner.  Workers made before the move to PPS will be able to access it.


This test server is not currently linked to the primary pool.  You can get a brief stats summary by going to http://188.40.44.150 .  If your User ID is listed more than once, it means either you are mining with multiple workers, or the difficulty on BTC/NMC has changed.  All valid BTC shares will be synchronized to the main server on Thursday, November 10th.  NMC shares may take slightly longer to be merged, but will be merged in once NMC mining is live on the primary pool.

This should go without saying:  Mining on the test pool should be done at your own risk.  I cannot guarantee stability.  However, if you take the risk, you'll be earning namecoins (though the ability to withdraw them will be delayed til sometime this weekend), as well as BTC at the normal PPS pool rate.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 09, 2011, 10:23:52 AM
 #130

I have a test server up for merged mining for anybody interested.  It is using the old user/worker database from before the move to PPS, so new users/workers will not be recognized.

You can mine on the test server by using 188.40.44.150:8332/ as the address in your miner.  Workers made before the move to PPS will be able to access it.


This test server is not currently linked to the primary pool.  You can get a brief stats summary by going to http://188.40.44.150 .  If your User ID is listed more than once, it means either you are mining with multiple workers, or the difficulty on BTC/NMC has changed.  All valid BTC shares will be synchronized to the main server on Thursday, November 10th.  NMC shares may take slightly longer to be merged, but will be merged in once NMC mining is live on the primary pool.

This should go without saying:  Mining on the test pool should be done at your own risk.  I cannot guarantee stability.  However, if you take the risk, you'll be earning namecoins (though the ability to withdraw them will be delayed til sometime this weekend), as well as BTC at the normal PPS pool rate.

Nice ! Can't wait till all is finalized.
dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 11:50:36 AM
 #131

Hmm seems to be a lot of stalls on namecoin side for me.

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
shads
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 254


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 12:32:32 PM
 #132

Hmm seems to be a lot of stalls on namecoin side for me.

What do you mean by stalls?  You miner shouldn't be able to see anything about the namecoin side.  Are you using cgminer?

PoolServerJ Home Page - High performance java mining pool engine

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright
Stop wasting the internet.
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
November 09, 2011, 02:31:44 PM
Last edit: November 09, 2011, 02:52:58 PM by eleuthria
 #133

Hmm seems to be a lot of stalls on namecoin side for me.

What do you mean by stalls?  You miner shouldn't be able to see anything about the namecoin side.  Are you using cgminer?


He's seeing Valid BTC (Invalid BTC), Valid NMC (Invalid NMC) on my stats page.  I'm betting cgminer as well, I'm running it and just as you said, it's ignoring longpolls for the NMC side and submitting partial-stales (valid BTC, stale NMC).


UPDATE:  Test server is going down for most of today.  A new build will deployed much later tonight.  Thank you all for helping in the first round of testing.
UPDATE 2:  I will merge over the BTC/NMC counts before turning the test server back on tonight so I can reset the test server stats for the next round.  As stated previously, NMC rewards won't be visible on the primary pool until later this weekend.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 02:37:58 PM
 #134

Yes I'm talking on the website the invalid shares but the good news is no invilds on the btc side.

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
ancow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2011, 05:09:48 PM
 #135

Hmm seems to be a lot of stalls on namecoin side for me.

What do you mean by stalls?  You miner shouldn't be able to see anything about the namecoin side.  Are you using cgminer?


He's seeing Valid BTC (Invalid BTC), Valid NMC (Invalid NMC) on my stats page.  I'm betting cgminer as well, I'm running it and just as you said, it's ignoring longpolls for the NMC side and submitting partial-stales (valid BTC, stale NMC).

The fix for this is in cgminer's git, but ckolivas hasn't packaged it yet.

BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 09, 2011, 07:28:52 PM
 #136

Hmm seems to be a lot of stalls on namecoin side for me.

What do you mean by stalls?  You miner shouldn't be able to see anything about the namecoin side.  Are you using cgminer?


He's seeing Valid BTC (Invalid BTC), Valid NMC (Invalid NMC) on my stats page.  I'm betting cgminer as well, I'm running it and just as you said, it's ignoring longpolls for the NMC side and submitting partial-stales (valid BTC, stale NMC).

The fix for this is in cgminer's git, but ckolivas hasn't packaged it yet.

WOW is there really a fix for this too. Nice work developers ! I thought this was something that could not be fixed and just a consequence of MM. You either prioritise BTC or NMC etc. not both use LP Huh
dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 09:18:05 PM
 #137

beta pool froze

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
sharky112065
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 383
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 10, 2011, 01:55:38 AM
 #138

Hey Eleuthria, on the API data ["past_24h_rewards":0.00000000], is showing zero despite the fact that it shows a correct value on the main web page at btcguild.com.

Donations welcome: 12KaKtrK52iQjPdtsJq7fJ7smC32tXWbWr
ancow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2011, 02:08:53 AM
 #139

He's seeing Valid BTC (Invalid BTC), Valid NMC (Invalid NMC) on my stats page.  I'm betting cgminer as well, I'm running it and just as you said, it's ignoring longpolls for the NMC side and submitting partial-stales (valid BTC, stale NMC).

The fix for this is in cgminer's git, but ckolivas hasn't packaged it yet.

WOW is there really a fix for this too. Nice work developers ! I thought this was something that could not be fixed and just a consequence of MM. You either prioritise BTC or NMC etc. not both use LP Huh

As eleuthria mentioned above, cgminer in its current version is ignoring some LPs. The fix in git just makes it honour those LPs as well. For more info, see the discussion leading up to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg602128#msg602128.

BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
November 10, 2011, 08:22:39 AM
 #140

Test server is back online.  Share counts were added to the same worker IDs on BTC Guild primary pool, including NMC (not yet visible).  Next round of testing is up for anybody interested (remember, it must be a worker made before we moved to PPS).

Test server for mining is 188.40.44.150:8332 .

If you're experiencing high stales on the test server, please comment on which miner you're using.  You can find out your UserID by looking at your API on the BTC Guild website.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 425 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!