|
gbx
|
 |
June 21, 2013, 11:58:13 PM |
|
My initial report is it looks better! Here's the same miner humming along... zero rejects on all! cgminer version 3.2.2 - Started: [2013-06-21 15:22:03]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):564.3M (avg):555.2Mh/s | A:593 R:0 HW:0 U:7.8/m WU:7.8/m
ST: 1 SS: 0 NB: 14 LW: 910 GF: 1 RF: 0
Connected to stratum.btcguild.com diff 1 with stratum as user
Block: 0005f928d5281aff... Diff:19.3M Started: [16:51:07] Best share: 4.08K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 59.0C 1319RPM | 555.5M/555.7Mh/s | A:594 R:0 HW:0 U: 7.82/m I: 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 22, 2013, 05:55:32 PM |
|
Minor cosmetic change: Hall of Fame Rankings no longer show miners that haven't submitted a single share in the last hour, which drastically increased how fast that page loads [and reduced the load of a script, yay!].
Overall the last few days have been very productive at reducing the performance impact of large scripts. I'm continuing to monitor the DB load and testing page load times at various intervals to see if there's any more time I can shave off before a hardware upgrade is required.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
June 22, 2013, 06:12:10 PM |
|
Minor cosmetic change: Hall of Fame Rankings no longer show miners that haven't submitted a single share in the last hour, which drastically increased how fast that page loads [and reduced the load of a script, yay!].
Now if we(I) could only see the page to admire your handiwork.  I would have thought that the attacker would have gotten bored by now. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 22, 2013, 06:20:39 PM |
|
Minor cosmetic change: Hall of Fame Rankings no longer show miners that haven't submitted a single share in the last hour, which drastically increased how fast that page loads [and reduced the load of a script, yay!].
Now if we(I) could only see the page to admire your handiwork. I would have thought that the attacker would have gotten bored by now. Surprised you would have a problem with Under Attack mode [all my phones/tablets/computers pass the checks]. I did turn it off just now, forgot to do so when I woke up this morning. Sorry! |
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
June 22, 2013, 06:45:43 PM |
|
Minor cosmetic change: Hall of Fame Rankings no longer show miners that haven't submitted a single share in the last hour, which drastically increased how fast that page loads [and reduced the load of a script, yay!].
Now if we(I) could only see the page to admire your handiwork. I would have thought that the attacker would have gotten bored by now. Surprised you would have a problem with Under Attack mode [all my phones/tablets/computers pass the checks]. I did turn it off just now, forgot to do so when I woke up this morning. Sorry! I guess the page requires java script. I have that disabled. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
pvtbrutus
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 23, 2013, 07:20:04 AM |
|
Minor cosmetic change: Hall of Fame Rankings no longer show miners that haven't submitted a single share in the last hour, which drastically increased how fast that page loads [and reduced the load of a script, yay!].
Was wondering why i jumped a few spots in my team and was missing members! But it does seem to load faster yes. |
|
|
|
|
xminerx
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
quickest cross blockchain transactions
|
|
June 23, 2013, 07:01:35 PM |
|
Whoohoo! Just went over 100,000 shares!  Let's see whether I can get to a million within a reasonable time frame  |
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
|
June 23, 2013, 11:54:35 PM |
|
Whoohoo! Just went over 100,000 shares! Let's see whether I can get to a million within a reasonable time frame How long have you been mining? Or are/were you relay slow? |
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 24, 2013, 12:02:31 AM |
|
Since I'm growing impatient waiting on my Avalon, BFL is still 9 months behind on pre-orders, and I've lost any desire to trust a new upstart with "pre order" ASICs, I'm starting to consider buying a batch of ASICMINER USB miners, and selling off the excess basically at cost to BTC Guild users in the US that don't want to commit to a full order (minimum is 50 units), and would rather not join in a group buy.
Just out of curiosity, are any of the US-based Guild miners interested? Price would be 1.01 BTC per ASICMINER USB (~330 MH/s). That's 0.99 [cost] + 0.02 shipping (possibly 0.03 shipping, but I'm pretty sure First Class USPS with Tracking would be under $2 unless they're heavier than they look).
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
June 24, 2013, 12:24:08 AM
Last edit: June 24, 2013, 02:22:28 AM by os2sam |
|
Just out of curiosity, are any of the US-based Guild miners interested? Price would be 1.01 BTC per ASICMINER USB (~330 MH/s).
Sure, I'll take 6 more at that price. Sam |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
LazyOtto
|
|
June 24, 2013, 12:26:35 AM |
|
Merely FYI. I like this calculator: http://www.coinish.com/calc/#With the new cost of 1btc per unit, looks to me like the profit at twelve months will be between -$35 and -$60 USD. (It all depends on your difficulty rate of increase assumption.) IOWs, you might make back about half of what you paid with twelve months of 100% efficiency mining. If you start mining on it *today*. |
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
June 24, 2013, 12:34:10 AM |
|
Merely FYI. I like this calculator: http://www.coinish.com/calc/#With the new cost of 1btc per unit, looks to me like the profit at twelve months will be between -$35 and -$60 USD. (It all depends on your difficulty rate of increase assumption.) IOWs, you might make back about half of what you paid with twelve months of 100% efficiency mining. If you start mining on it *today*. Well a calculator is a useful tool, but is not reality. Only time will tell if they are a good deal or not. Also we have no idea how long they will last, nor what will happen to BTC prices. I got 2+ years out of my GPU's mining 24/7. Block Erupters make allot less noise, heat not to mention use allot less electricity. So I plan on mining these for years, if they last that long. Sam |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
rsbriggs
|
|
June 24, 2013, 12:48:23 AM |
|
I taking ten at that price.
|
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 24, 2013, 12:51:44 AM |
|
Nothing set in stone yet guys, just trying to gauge interest before I place an order. I'm mostly interested in them as a way to experiment with ASIC mining [since I bet I'd get them before my Batch 2 ships], as well as be able to help people who have problems setting them up. However, it looks like I won't have a problem reselling them at reasonable prices with smaller orders.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
June 24, 2013, 01:05:51 AM |
|
Nothing set in stone yet guys, just trying to gauge interest before I place an order. I'm mostly interested in them as a way to experiment with ASIC mining [since I bet I'd get them before my Batch 2 ships], as well as be able to help people who have problems setting them up. However, it looks like I won't have a problem reselling them at reasonable prices with smaller orders.
I've been very happy with CGMiner 3.2.1 on my Win7 mining rig. I have had trouble with running multiple instances on multiple pools but if I mine them all on one pool everything runs flawlessly. They are fun to experiment with. And the blinky lights are very nice Sam |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
bitcoindaddy
|
|
June 24, 2013, 02:02:58 AM |
|
Since I'm growing impatient waiting on my Avalon, BFL is still 9 months behind on pre-orders, and I've lost any desire to trust a new upstart with "pre order" ASICs, I'm starting to consider buying a batch of ASICMINER USB miners, and selling off the excess basically at cost to BTC Guild users in the US that don't want to commit to a full order (minimum is 50 units), and would rather not join in a group buy.
Just out of curiosity, are any of the US-based Guild miners interested? Price would be 1.01 BTC per ASICMINER USB (~330 MH/s). That's 0.99 [cost] + 0.02 shipping (possibly 0.03 shipping, but I'm pretty sure First Class USPS with Tracking would be under $2 unless they're heavier than they look).
Huh? I thought they were 1.99 each? Did they lower the price? Edit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=217104.0Oh my god, I'm fucked. I paid twice as much. |
|
|
|
|
|
Joshwaa
|
|
June 24, 2013, 02:19:30 AM |
|
Sorry to hear that man.
@Eleuthria : I would be interested in a couple.
|
Like what I said : 1JosHWaA2GywdZo9pmGLNJ5XSt8j7nzNiF
Don't like what I said : 1FuckU1u89U9nBKQu4rCHz16uF4RhpSTV
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 24, 2013, 04:11:12 AM |
|
A bit more interest than I expected between the forum and IRC. Got some emails out to ASICMINER right now to setup a buy and also get some timeline details for different order sizes. I will post an update after an order is made, identifying when I will start selling them and how they will be available. Obviously BTC will be the first available method for payment, since dealing in USD is risky business when it comes to chargebacks.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
xminerx
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
quickest cross blockchain transactions
|
|
June 24, 2013, 06:53:01 AM |
|
Whoohoo! Just went over 100,000 shares! Let's see whether I can get to a million within a reasonable time frame How long have you been mining? Or are/were you relay slow? Not exactly the reaction I was hoping for, but I started on this pool on June 8th I have a 300 MHash miner directed here full-time. |
|
|
|
|
davecoin
|
|
June 24, 2013, 04:40:11 PM |
|
A bit more interest than I expected between the forum and IRC. Got some emails out to ASICMINER right now to setup a buy and also get some timeline details for different order sizes. I will post an update after an order is made, identifying when I will start selling them and how they will be available. Obviously BTC will be the first available method for payment, since dealing in USD is risky business when it comes to chargebacks.
I'll buy one for the novelty. |
|
|
|
|
|
