|
psahx
|
 |
July 09, 2014, 10:49:38 PM |
|
Of say the last 20 blocks, you found 2, wouldnt you have some small amount of curiosity of which two of those 20 you found ?
Or is it kind of a sweet found two blocks and leave it at that ?
I just think a small amount of in depth info wouldnt hurt in regards to knowing which block you found of say the last 20 if any.
I would rather have Michael implemented something, that could theoretically attract some part of the greedy or uninformed GHASH users to our pool... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xstr8guy
|
|
July 10, 2014, 03:25:51 AM |
|
Now that I'm running some serious gear, 3+ Th/s... every time we find a block I find myself checking stats with a small amount of excitement hoping it was me lol.
Is there a way to tell specifically which member found which block ?
I found 4 blocks in relatively quick succession a while back. I asked the same question then and Eluthria had no interest in providing that information. I haven't found a block since. |
|
|
|
|
|
psahx
|
|
July 10, 2014, 05:57:29 AM |
|
I found 4 blocks in relatively quick succession a while back. I asked the same question then and Eluthria had no interest in providing that information.
I haven't found a block since.
LOL Sounded, like you did it on purpose  |
|
|
|
|
|
ALToids
|
|
July 10, 2014, 07:26:35 AM |
|
Now that I'm running some serious gear, 3+ Th/s... every time we find a block I find myself checking stats with a small amount of excitement hoping it was me lol.
Is there a way to tell specifically which member found which block ?
I found 4 blocks in relatively quick succession a while back. I asked the same question then and Eluthria had no interest in providing that information. I haven't found a block since. xstr8guy is performing a block withholding attack out of spite for lack of recognition.... get him! J/K. I know Eleuthria's busy trying to get scyrptguild updates with new coins to the updates maybe on the backburner. |
|
|
|
|
|
xstr8guy
|
|
July 10, 2014, 10:14:30 AM |
|
Now that I'm running some serious gear, 3+ Th/s... every time we find a block I find myself checking stats with a small amount of excitement hoping it was me lol.
Is there a way to tell specifically which member found which block ?
I found 4 blocks in relatively quick succession a while back. I asked the same question then and Eluthria had no interest in providing that information. I haven't found a block since. xstr8guy is performing a block withholding attack out of spite for lack of recognition.... get him! J/K. I know Eleuthria's busy trying to get scyrptguild updates with new coins to the updates maybe on the backburner. Lol, believe me, it wasn't on purpose! I had a small window (with Bitfury, ASICMiner and KNC gear) that I had a nice hashrate advantage with the pool. I was soon overtaken by guys with much bigger hashrates. And then I quickly faded into the background. I think all of my blocks came within a 2 or 3 week period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
psahx
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:15:53 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:30:57 AM |
|
Nothing changed, we just got one hell of a burst of blocks. 5 between 7:30 and 8:23 (PST).
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
|
psahx
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:47:40 AM |
|
Nothing changed, we just got one hell of a burst of blocks. 5 between 7:30 and 8:23 (PST).
 |
|
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 11, 2014, 06:53:06 AM |
|
I am having an issue with the pool website. When I select a shift Detail (VIEW), it hangs up running a long script. After trying several different things I finally interrupted the script and had control of the page. It looks like the hang-up is caused by the User Rewards Detail for Shift#18xxx , instead of listing the top handful of contributers it opens the ENTIRE list from 1 to xx000 workers. Was this intentionally changed? Or do I have an issue with my browser settings that's gone awry?  |
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 11, 2014, 07:03:25 AM |
|
I am having an issue with the pool website. When I select a shift Detail (VIEW), it hangs up running a long script. After trying several different things I finally interrupted the script and had control of the page. It looks like the hang-up is caused by the User Rewards Detail for Shift#18xxx , instead of listing the top handful of contributers it opens the ENTIRE list from 1 to xx000 workers. Was this intentionally changed? Or do I have an issue with my browser settings that's gone awry? The script that is hanging up for you is the one that paginates the data. Every detail view loads the entire list, then javascript reduces it into the searchable/paginated table. Sounds like you're interrupting the script, meaning it never paginates it, leaving a giant unsorted/unsearchable list instead. It's not instant, but I've never had it take that long on any of my computers. Even my phone is able to do it fairly quick. But I use Chrome (and android/chrome on the phone), which is really fast with javascript. |
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 11, 2014, 07:06:42 AM |
|
This may be an issue with my JAVA installation then, I will try updating it and see if that helps, Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 11, 2014, 07:11:51 AM |
|
This may be an issue with my JAVA installation then, I will try updating it and see if that helps, Thanks.
Java != JavaScript. It would have no effect unless it really screwed something up with your browser. Are you using Firefox by chance? I know Firefox's javascript processing has been really spotty with different versions of the browser (it completely hanged on the PPLNS luck graph back before I started merging multiple shifts into a single datapoint). |
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:27:07 AM |
|
No, I'm using IE 11.0.10 on a Win8.1Pro w/update x64. It seems like patch Tuesday has jacked up a bunch of stuff, its looking like I might have to roll back and see if that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jedimstr
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:41:24 AM |
|
No, I'm using IE 11.0.10 on a Win8.1Pro w/update x64. It seems like patch Tuesday has jacked up a bunch of stuff, its looking like I might have to roll back and see if that helps.
Quick fix for you... Don't use IE. Ever. |
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:48:09 AM |
|
I can get it to load on IE after 135 secs, Google Chrome takes 127 secs. Not much difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
psahx
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:49:09 AM |
|
No, I'm using IE 11.0.10 on a Win8.1Pro w/update x64. It seems like patch Tuesday has jacked up a bunch of stuff, its looking like I might have to roll back and see if that helps.
Quick fix for you... Don't use IE. Ever. Exactly. I am using win 8.1, updated JAVA yesterday. No issues on chrome, do not even want to run IE. Nothing really changed for me after updating JAVA to the latest version. |
|
|
|
|
|
Icon
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:34:13 PM |
|
quick fix remove and delete java, and never ever ever never ever use java (sun java) not java scrypt.
Problem solved.. Not unless you want to open your pc up to be taken over ..
Java is about a secure as a screen door on a submarine.
Icon
|
|
|
|
|
|
psahx
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:44:35 PM |
|
quick fix remove and delete java, and never ever ever never ever use java (sun java) not java scrypt.
Problem solved.. Not unless you want to open your pc up to be taken over ..
Java is about a secure as a screen door on a submarine.
Icon
I am talking about Oracle Java for chrome. |
|
|
|
|
|
Icon
|
|
July 11, 2014, 04:48:10 PM |
|
yep sun = oracle same, stay away from , or at the very lest don't allow java to run in the browser.
Icon
|
|
|
|
|
|
