COMIT>>>>Yes it does seem so...
![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
These coins should have been designated lots 1 thru 5.
So much unnecessary confusion really..and Denarium should have been here in the last 30 minutes to clarify and update the highest bidders list.
I also see Ramelius only won one coin according to Teegumes list...shouldn't it have been two?
I mean I see that was his intention there..that is to bid on two coins.
Why would he bid higher when his first bid was one of the winning bids??
Yes the rules says what it says and if that's the case then the latest bid cancels the the first one?
If 5 lots were designated one for each coin all of this would have been avoided.
![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
Absolutely, this auction won't win the professionalism price!
I haven't been contacted in the meantime, Denarium hasn't been online since yesterday afternoon...
![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
And you are right about teeGUMES list, it should be as follows:
Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
Ramelius 1 @ 0.127
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123
Anyway, looking forward to where this is going.
![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
Based on following auction rule:
“When you post a bid, the bids in your previous posts are considered to be automatically canceled. You can put multiple bids in one post, however.”
The 0.13 from ramelius should therefor replace his previous bid of 0.127.
Teegumes list should therefor be the correct one:
Ramelius 1 @ 0.13
BitcoinNewsMagazine 1 @ 0.128
hybridsole 1 @ 0.125
Comit 1 @ 0.123
bavicrypto 1 @ 0.122
Unless they say that 20utc was the actualy stop time or....
I don’t even care anymore at this point, just let us know the winning bids please.
Thanks