Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 02:52:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 0-  (Read 736 times)
mcleo (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
0-
February 28, 2014, 06:17:45 AM
Last edit: March 16, 2014, 11:02:19 PM by mcleo
 #1

-0
1713970357
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970357

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970357
Reply with quote  #2

1713970357
Report to moderator
1713970357
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970357

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970357
Reply with quote  #2

1713970357
Report to moderator
1713970357
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713970357

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713970357
Reply with quote  #2

1713970357
Report to moderator
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Vortuarackne
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 12:55:28 PM
 #2

Overall, what is the legal stance on BitCoin Ponzi sites, considering BitCoins are yet to be recognised as legal tender in the majority of countries?
Vortuarackne
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 10:13:52 AM
 #3

Ponzi schemes are fraud.
The key operating word (I believe) that you use is "BitCoin".  Does Bitcoin nullify illegalities when it comes to fraud?
Absolutely not.

So long as something has value, that something can be applied to the overarching umbrella of fraud in the majority of jurisdictions.  I know this is the case in Europe and even North America.

In sum, the legal stance on Bitcoin ponzi schemes would be that they are absolutely open to being prosecuted under the right circumstances.
The hard part (and why I highlighted the key operating word earlier) is that to prove a Bitcoin site is running a ponzi is substantially more difficult than proving a fiat-ponzi.  It involves significantly more resources (I would imagine).



Thanks for the reply, is a Ponzi a fraud when it is clearly labelled as a Ponzi and sufficient rules\warnings in place? E.g. payouts are not guaranteed, only invest when you can afford to potentially lose etc?

That, in my own humble mind, makes it more of a risky investment scheme\gambling game than anything, as no deception is taking place.

Hopefully you understand where I am coming from, I think it is something, like many things BitCoin related, which are open to varying interpretation.
impresionesmline
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 01, 2014, 05:37:50 PM
 #4

Let´s talk about something common as a defaulted loan, which are the legal alternatives for the lender? And what do you recomend the lender to do?
DarwinNexus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 04:45:59 AM
 #5

Not sure where to put this cause I don't see a rep thread for mcleo.  Very helpful guy and despite getting nothing out of it, spent a lot of time going back-and-forth with me regarding MtGox and my tied up coins.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!