Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 11:16:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 101 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision  (Read 225759 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (1596 posts by 1 users with 340 merit deleted.)
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 17, 2019, 12:54:07 PM
 #61

The proof is in the pudding not all willing to get or even eat.

https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969&SearchText=

"Proof" of what? An Australian man leaves a comment on an American legal issue. Anybody in the world can comment here, and anybody does. The only thing this is "proof" of is that Craig believes he's Satoshi.

"If anyone tells you separately the blockchain can work outside existing legislation, statutes and
rules they are seeking to mislead and defraud for the sole purpose of avoiding regulation and
creating unregulated bucket shops and dark web markets."

It does work outside existing legislation and it has for the entirety of its existence. What's he rambling about? He's clearly a lunatic.

Triggered?

Get over it

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
1711624619
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711624619

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711624619
Reply with quote  #2

1711624619
Report to moderator
1711624619
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711624619

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711624619
Reply with quote  #2

1711624619
Report to moderator
1711624619
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711624619

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711624619
Reply with quote  #2

1711624619
Report to moderator
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
67semih
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
February 17, 2019, 02:27:30 PM
 #62

Im with you from the begining. I hope we will see a new ath soon.
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 18, 2019, 03:38:10 PM
 #63

Things are getting implemented. A new valued P2P internet is getting born

https://www.yours.org/content/proof-of-concept-edi-850-transaction-from-dynamics-365-erp-ebed3756d0eb

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 18, 2019, 05:20:49 PM
 #64

https://medium.com/@Bitcoin_Beyond/forensic-report-raises-questions-about-australian-tax-offices-handling-of-craig-wright-probe-138843251ef5

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 18, 2019, 06:21:22 PM
 #65


Thx. This is massive content and analysis.

I m sure way too much to read for most trolls.

 Grin

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 03:50:41 AM
 #66

https://youtu.be/00WvdE1zOvw

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 02:13:23 PM
 #67


Already read that in great detail.

Foul play alleged from all sides.

CSW claims to be Satoshi and yet has still not Signed any block as definitive proof.

I'm certainly not a troll, I used to communicate with Satoshi (on this very forum).

Unlike Craig, I have verified myself ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Craig (currently) being unable or unwilling to (legitimately) Sign anything has caused 2 major problems for BSV / nchain.

1) Not signing a stated claim is a false pretence.

2) The continuing duration of this false pretence has impacted on the entire crypto space, including the market.

...

If folks actually digested my own posts you would likely discover that I have not referred to Craig as a 'Faketoshi' or otherwise.

Innocent until proven guilty. However ...

Why does Craig avoid Bitcoin 'old timers' like the plague and/or not just come back to this forum to set the record straight? According to Craig's own story he had moved on to other things ... whilst leaving the Bitcoin community to both establish, maintain and build the project in his absence (and off their own backs!).

Do you think it is OK to retain the (metaphorical) last piece of the puzzle, to place the final piece and to proclaim wholeheartedly "I built all this" and "You are all wrong!" etc.,

...

People in the world
Do not doubt
It is teaching
Which is the
beginning of doubt.
- Zen poem

...

Again, this is Financial Cryptography, so do not trust. Sign and Verify.
Simply, Put up, or Shut up.
- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+up+or+shut+up



Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 02:31:45 PM
 #68

Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?

Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them.

Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from.

Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't.

Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant.

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 20, 2019, 04:28:43 PM
 #69

Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?

Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them.

Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from.

Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't.

Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant.

There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554



"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."

Looks like he has at least 5 masters, he forsure has 1 completed PhD and he’s currently at Leicester doing a PhD in law. But that’s okay, take this video for example, you provide proof and your still a scammer according to 180 dislikes.

https://youtu.be/QiK34QicusI

Would you be more satisfied with 11 masters instead of 10?

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
Bitcoin SV (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 626
Merit: 234



View Profile
February 21, 2019, 08:39:42 PM
Last edit: June 14, 2019, 02:42:14 AM by Bitcoin SV
 #70

Bitcoin Cash Forked Splitting Into Two Blockchains
https://forklog.media/bitcoin-cash-forked-splitting-into-two-blockchains
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2019, 05:11:56 AM
Last edit: April 15, 2019, 03:23:34 PM by mprep
 #71

But  but but ... LN  is Bitcoin they said

https://mobile.twitter.com/pierre_rochard/status/1098222798546354177?s=21



https://www.yours.org/content/the-john-dillon-leaks---redacted-d839bae64ca6

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
tharp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 03:44:35 PM
 #72

Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?

Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them.

Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from.

Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't.

Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant.

There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554

"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."

He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.

https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf

Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:

April 7 2017-    Doctor of Philosophy
Dec 11 2009-    Master of Statistics
May 15 2008-   Master of Laws with Commendation
June 28 2012-   Master of Science Information Security Engineering
Sept 21 2012-   Master of Science Information Security Management
April 2 2009-   Master of Information Systems Security
May 3 2006-   Master of Management (Information Technology)
April 8 2005-   Master of Networking and System Administration

GIAC Information Technology Certificates:

July 3 2007-   GIAC Security Essentials- GSEC
Sept 16 2006-   GIAC Systems and Network Auditor- GSNA
Feb 5 2011-   GIAC Information Security Professional- GISP
April 24 2008-   GIAC Security Leadership- GSLC
Feb 12 2011-   GIAC Secure Software Programmer- .NET-GSSP-.NET
July 24 2011-   GIAC Penetration Tester- GPEN
Sept 16 2006-   GIAC Systems and Network Auditor- GSNA
Jan 1 2011-   GIAC Web Application Penetration Tester- GWAPT
Jan 22 2011-   GIAC Information Security Fundamentals- GISF
Dec 21 2007-   GIAC Assessing and Auditing Wireless Networks- GAWN
June 24 2008-   GIAC Hydration Detection
Jan 15 2008-   GIAC Electronic Contracting in a Secure World
Sept 15 2009-   GIAC Security Expert- GSEC
April 25 2005-   GIAC Certified ISO-17799 Specialist- G7799
Sept 6 2005-   GIAC Certified Forensics Analyst- GCFA
May 25 2009-   GIAC Certified Project Manager- GCPM
Dec 8 2008-   GIAC Current Issues in DNS
June 28 2007-   GIAC Legal Issues in Information Technology & Security- GLEG
June 2 2008-   GIAC .NET- GNET

ISACA Information Technology Certificates:
June 17 2003-   Certified Information Security Manager

ISC Information Technology Certificates:
June 2006-      Certified Information Systems Security Professional
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 22, 2019, 05:27:08 PM
 #73

There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554

"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."

He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.

https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf

Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:

April 7 2017-    Doctor of Philosophy

Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/

His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child.

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
tharp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 22, 2019, 05:35:21 PM
 #74

There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554

"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."

He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.

https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf

Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:

April 7 2017-    Doctor of Philosophy

Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/

Right.... So you would rather DISMISS the achievements I just listed dating back to at least 2005. This is PoW if you don't get that your just another sheep. This doesn't even include his PUBLISHED and also PEER-REVIEWED papers. The truth is in front of you if you put in the PoW and actually do your OWN thinking. If you have been in this community for as long as you have then you should understand how bitcoin works. I have and I have only been doing this for the last 2 years.

Keep up with the dismissing though. You reap what you sow and I want you to remember this 5-10 years down the road.

Cheers I have work to do.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 24, 2019, 07:41:57 PM
 #75

There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554

"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."

He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.

https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf

Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:

April 7 2017-    Doctor of Philosophy

Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/

His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child.

More on that

https://dannidfitnessandnutrition.com/2018/08/13/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother/

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2019, 09:30:06 PM
 #76

There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554

"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics."

He didn't even get his doctorate until 2017! The man is a narcissist and a pathological liar, and you are defending him in order to con the general public.

https://nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/12/Craig-Wright-Academic-Degrees-Certificates_2017.pdf

Here's a PoW timeline for you sir:

April 7 2017-    Doctor of Philosophy

Right, so like I said, he's a pathological liar. He lied about having a couple of doctorates in 2016. He's been caught in several lies, all well documented, his biggest being that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. Even his mother even said that he's basically a liar, even though she put it more kindly than that:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/

His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child.

More on that

https://dannidfitnessandnutrition.com/2018/08/13/is-he-satoshi-or-is-he-my-brother/

BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.

It also seems that it has the biggest story of value as well.

 Grin

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2019, 07:18:35 AM
 #77


BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.

Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money.


Ur mixing up price and value.  Grow up.  Cool

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 25, 2019, 11:16:43 AM
 #78


BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.

Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money.


Ur mixing up price and value.  Grow up.  Cool

How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?

Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 25, 2019, 11:56:57 AM
 #79

How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?

Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.

So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point.

Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy.

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 520
Merit: 123



View Profile
February 25, 2019, 12:29:28 PM
 #80

How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?

Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.

So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point.

Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy.

Again, what you're talking about applies to a thousand different coins. BSV is just yet another bitcoin fork and the market is treating it as such. Bitcoin mining isn't in any danger of shutting down or ceasing to be. A huge uptick in LN usage won't be the end of mining.

That’s sustainable thinking.  Grin

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 101 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!