[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision

[hv_]

U re jsut about names and ppl

The protocol 0.1 works - so why change ?

There is no reason why, except u want to say sth / dev sth / Feature sth - ON THE BASE LAYER

-> go & change TCP/IP -  have fun

What? You can barely type words. You're not fit for the discussion of improvements between builds, of which there are several.

Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19

You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again.

Completely irrelevant. What your illiterate fellow cult member was inferring was that Satoshi's last version of Bitcoin was 0.1, which is simply not true. Focusing on 0.1 as if it were the end-all version of Bitcoin is just a talking point used by Craig, and nothing more.

Completely irrelevant.

Stay on RBF coin - have fun

[1713882063]

1713882063

[1713882063]

1713882063

[1713882063]

1713882063

[hv_]

Go challenge urself on highest levels

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DcxG1tWuBg

eternal students welcome in BitCoin - for ever

 

[ðºÞæ]

Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be

[hv_]

Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be

All good to protect BitCoin

Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness

All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly

Scalable

Transparent

-> will trigger lots of haters

 

[ðºÞæ]

Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be

All good to protect BitCoin

Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness

All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly

Scalable

Transparent

-> will trigger lots of haters

 

Haters are triggered a long time ago.

something else to rise blood pressure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Lb4xClEYY
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/kaching-secure-bitcoin-wallet#/

[hv_]

Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be

All good to protect BitCoin

Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness

All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly

Scalable

Transparent

-> will trigger lots of haters

 

Haters are triggered a long time ago.

something else to rise blood pressure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Lb4xClEYY
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/kaching-secure-bitcoin-wallet#/

Oh - more potential haters down the list

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/blockchain-patents-global-china-dominates-caict/

I'm really happy top one is for BitCoin exclusive!!!




--- And, No  -   there is now way to be stopped at all

[jbreher]

Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19

You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again.

Completely irrelevant. What your illiterate fellow cult member was inferring was that Satoshi's last version of Bitcoin was 0.1, which is simply not true. Focusing on 0.1 as if it were the end-all version of Bitcoin is just a talking point used by Craig, and nothing more.

Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807

hv_ spake thusly:

My advice: Look into the Version 0.1

Set in Stone.

No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level

Note the use of _protocol_.

To which BitcoinFX replied:

*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...

Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21

Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21

Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.

[hv_]

Holey Moley

Is this a thing?

Chinese MoneyButton?

Opens today


https://mobile.twitter.com/Fastpaybutton/status/1197700932957376512

Watching...

[hv_]

Give away

https://mobile.twitter.com/JoelDalais/status/1197964165920542721

 

[hv_]

Learn about BitCoin how it worked / BSV will work

directly from the devs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDosU8UA2I

[jbreher]

Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807

hv_ spake thusly:

My advice: Look into the Version 0.1

Set in Stone.

No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level

Note the use of _protocol_.

To which BitcoinFX replied:

*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...

Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21

Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21

Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.

So you're implying that 0.1 isn't an implementation of the protocol but 0.2 and 0.3 are?

I’m not implying anything. I am explicitly stating that the client version 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are all implementations of client code that run the same version of the same protocol.

[Anarcocapitalista]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?

[hv_]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?

In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)


Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...

[hv_]

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?

In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)


Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...

LMAO.

0 conf shitcoin is anything but Bitcoin.
Closed source dev is anything but Bitcoin.
The face of the project calling for the possibility to "reverse or undo" Tx is anything but Bitcoin.

.. the only closed thing here seems to be ur own washed mind

BSV is fully about opencompetition - if you cannot read / understand simple Bitcoin code - u cannot compete.

try harder
 

[hv_]

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

After Segwit, BTC is not Original Bitcoin anymore. Only BSV - is Original Bitcoin Now. Because it is Original Satoshi Vision

Fraudvision, fakevision.

Proof ? Steve Shadder ("nChain solutions and engineering director") own bullshit.

https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/11/24/on-the-future-of-bitcoin-transaction-fees/
"There is no particular reason for this price level and it appears to be widely agreed among the BSV ecosystem that rate is currently too high for data transactions (as compared to payment transactions)."

Bitcoin purpose is to be a peer to peer electronic cash system.

BSV purpose is to become a peer to peer electronic data transactions system.

-> It's not Bitcoin.

It is becoming !

Yes


P2P electronic data transactions system


Ok

By cash

Yes. Fine. U ll need money to transact.

We call Bitcoin

[hv_]

More businesses seeing the light

https://mobile.twitter.com/The_Cryptoh_Pro/status/1199344256357298177

Tutuuut

BSV is BitCoin

[ðºÞæ]

The Satoshi round table without Satoshi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKV_WM6ohlg

[hv_]

The Satoshi round table without Satoshi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKV_WM6ohlg

Ouch

Hope ppl see that cluster fcu

BSV not affected. Unfuckening!


BSV is the true BitCoin.


As designed

Working stable

Not Tether Pumped Ponzi

[ðºÞæ]

Abscission the witness. Ouch, that must hurt.


Lets change the world instead
https://youtu.be/rCvZFwqyj8M

[hv_]

Congrats - Page

100

100 pages of disinformation and petty squabbles
Virtually NO Support.  NO community.  No logic. NO-nsence
What a fucking joke

CONGRATULATIONS

Thx - we take the congrats

Leave u allone with all ur hate and disinfo

Cheers