FreeCash - the first casino that has a winners-only policy!

[ARTiShock2008]

by the way, ERC-223 fixes a few ERC-20 issues and is backward compatible. It’s better in al lthe aspcets. It isn’t that much complex as well as i believe

[1714035700]

1714035700

[DonProton]

by the way, ERC-223 fixes a few ERC-20 issues and is backward compatible. It’s better in al lthe aspcets. It isn’t that much complex as well as i believe

yea, for real, it’s funny to sometimes read that the global immigration to ERC-223 will soon occur and see new tokens being based on the ‘outdadet standard’)))

[C|R|Y|P|T|O|M|A|N]

Bluntly speaking, ERC-223 is only a kind of token with the ‘fool protection’ - it makes one unable to transfer tokens to some other smart contract without the ability to withdraw anything but these are particular details.

[DreamerJ]

Bluntly speaking, ERC-223 is only a kind of token with the ‘fool protection’ - it makes one unable to transfer tokens to some other smart contract without the ability to withdraw anything but these are particular details.

Where have you read about that? the global immigration?

[kmntrci]

Bluntly speaking, ERC-223 is only a kind of token with the ‘fool protection’ - it makes one unable to transfer tokens to some other smart contract without the ability to withdraw anything but these are particular details.

Where have you read about that? the global immigration?

there’s no 223 even here: eips.ethereum.org/all
 ie its status isn’t really defined yet at all.

[ripzombie]

Bluntly speaking, ERC-223 is only a kind of token with the ‘fool protection’ - it makes one unable to transfer tokens to some other smart contract without the ability to withdraw anything but these are particular details.

Where have you read about that? the global immigration?

there’s no 223 even here: eips.ethereum.org/all
 ie its status isn’t really defined yet at all.

you consider this to be an only reputable source?...

[pogi23]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

[Phileste]

If guys from the buterin’s team don’t consider this standard a standard doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist and can’t be used for smart contracts

[JohnYDillinger]

If guys from the buterin’s team don’t consider this standard a standard doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist and can’t be used for smart contracts

you’re contradicting yourself. let them use whatever they want. if a project is being built on the Ethereum project, why not use the ancestor of all the other standards - ERC-20?..

[GucciGangClub]

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

[ripzombie]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

[kmntrci]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

[libope]

Most people here claim its another asset bubble...i support everyone

What are you even talking about, we are living inside a global financial bubble already, dollar is an asset bubble, we’re all just tricked into trading papers since like 1917 or earler

whoa whoa whoa, we need to slow it down here)

[pactiond]

Most people here claim its another asset bubble...i support everyone

What are you even talking about, we are living inside a global financial bubble already, dollar is an asset bubble, we’re all just tricked into trading papers since like 1917 or earler

Cryptocurrency is an abstract market asset, that’s the way it is. Only the developed business with sufficient investments can make it cost real money and bring profit.

a dollar is an asset bubble so what? it’s still a worldwide currency

[beheper]

Most people here claim its another asset bubble...i support everyone

What are you even talking about, we are living inside a global financial bubble already, dollar is an asset bubble, we’re all just tricked into trading papers since like 1917 or earler

Cryptocurrency is an abstract market asset, that’s the way it is. Only the developed business with sufficient investments can make it cost real money and bring profit.

a dollar is an asset bubble so what? it’s still a worldwide currency

yea, everyone needs bucks

[HappStoreW]

A congressman from the states is rooting for forbidding ICO because he believes that token production harms national economy. He commented positively on the technology though. Other congress representatives state that crypto must be left alone and prosper. I can see that there are arguments as to opinions in this aspect and i it’s unclear to which outcome this will lead us all.

what’s unclear? the american government knows what they’re doing, they thing about people and don’t want regular people to fall for such money-wasting opportunities.

I personally doubt that they’ll really do something about it; they may regulate it, but not forbid. I don’t really get how tokens can harm the economy, ICO it’s still an investment in prospects.

they seem to not really know what to do with all of that. senators probably just want to understand whether they’ll get some profit eventually or not…

but they can’t do that

[pogi23]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

[saveeege]

If guys from the buterin’s team don’t consider this standard a standard doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist and can’t be used for smart contracts

you’re contradicting yourself. let them use whatever they want. if a project is being built on the Ethereum project, why not use the ancestor of all the other standards - ERC-20?..

because it is an outdated standard. Let’s see it it changes in future. However I am doubting

[dhaemp64]

A congressman from the states is rooting for forbidding ICO because he believes that token production harms national economy. He commented positively on the technology though. Other congress representatives state that crypto must be left alone and prosper. I can see that there are arguments as to opinions in this aspect and i it’s unclear to which outcome this will lead us all.

what’s unclear? the american government knows what they’re doing, they thing about people and don’t want regular people to fall for such money-wasting opportunities.

I personally doubt that they’ll really do something about it; they may regulate it, but not forbid. I don’t really get how tokens can harm the economy, ICO it’s still an investment in prospects.

they seem to not really know what to do with all of that. senators probably just want to understand whether they’ll get some profit eventually or not…

but they can’t do that

ohh reaaaalllyyyy…

[Sevreki]

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(