Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2019, 12:22:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: One cent crypto coins  (Read 490 times)
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1643


TEMP and VOM member and monderator.


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2018, 01:57:59 PM
 #1

I'm tempted to have a go at speculating on a few one cent crypto coins. If one chooses coins with interesting concepts and utility, and that have the semblance of an efficient structure, could one expect a success rate of better than 1 in 10?

In this thread, I'm not looking for members to spam coin suggestions, but I would like a discussion on the general concept of speculating in extremely low cost coins, and the points one should consider when evaluating them.
1558527739
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558527739

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558527739
Reply with quote  #2

1558527739
Report to moderator
NEW GAME FORMAT
JACKPOT UP TO $8000+
Guess The Symbols Of a Real Ethereum Hash
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1558527739
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558527739

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558527739
Reply with quote  #2

1558527739
Report to moderator
The Pharmacist
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1526
Merit: 2916



View Profile
September 07, 2018, 02:01:14 PM
Last edit: September 07, 2018, 02:22:13 PM by The Pharmacist
Merited by Jet Cash (2)
 #2

I wouldn't do it.  Some of those coins are cheap for a reason, i.e., no one wants them.  You have to look at whether there are any buy orders on the exchange you're looking at, what the trading volume is, etc.  It could easily happen that once you buy one of those coins you'll never be able to sell it.  Some of them are moribund and will never rise above 1 cent or 1 satoshi ever again.

On the other hand if you've got money to play with and can stand losing it, go for it.  You might get lucky, but I'm thinking you probably won't.

I'd buy no more than a dollar's worth of each coin to start with
Now even though I just said it's probably not worth it to buy any of these turds, I would say that IF you're going to do it you ought to buy more than $1 worth.  I'd probably buy $10 at least, but that's just me.  A coin would have to seriously skyrocket to make $1 turn into anything significant.  There are exchange fees to consider, and trading minimums too.  I'm not even sure if $10 would be too little for most exchanges.
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1244


https://bit.ly/2FR9nyn - free python tutorials


View Profile
September 07, 2018, 02:09:27 PM
Last edit: September 07, 2018, 02:30:57 PM by jackg
Merited by Jet Cash (2)
 #3

I'd buy no more than a dollar's worth of each coin to start with (you can always go higher if one looks more interesting).
I'd take a look at how the coin is marketed and also it's receptoin here (if the creator has negative trust from a DT because the binary exectuables are laced with viruses, I'd say that's one reason to look away from it.

You could also look at how much their ICO made (if they used an escrow agent) or how much they paid for their domain name too.
bill gator
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1011



View Profile
September 07, 2018, 05:08:04 PM
Merited by Jet Cash (5)
 #4

I'd be willing to bet that if you analyze the coins as you've mentioned for utility, structural efficiency, some implemented concept(s) that solves an existing problem and found them to be around 1-cent, that these coins will go up significantly. Certainly more than 1-in-10 coins, of the type you've described, will go beyond $0.01 in value, so long as their supply doesn't experience hyper-inflation or something else that would decimate the usefulness of the coin. You'd have to have that 1 coin out of 10 go up at least 10x in value, assuming the other coins flop, for this to be considered successful. More likely though, the other coins will move with the market in a corollary manner and you can expect profit on multiple fronts.

I know you're not looking for spam about specific coins, but even an algorithm like x16R being adopted by a coin that is otherwise benign gives it a huge leg up on a majority of alt-coins (long-term). You could run your own personal LoyceV-style investment game, using your own money (if preferred), following your criteria (with the help of the community, if needed) and keep a diary of your progress and process in the form of a thread. I'd say this would be a profitable endeavor, without hesitation or any reasonable doubt.

Personally, I wouldn't put more than $100 into a 1-cent coin, but I wouldn't put anything less than $10-$25 that I actually had faith in.
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1643


TEMP and VOM member and monderator.


View Profile WWW
September 08, 2018, 09:31:23 AM
Last edit: September 08, 2018, 10:34:15 AM by Jet Cash
 #5

You could run your own personal LoyceV-style investment game, using your own money (if preferred), following your criteria (with the help of the community, if needed) and keep a diary of your progress and process in the form of a thread. I'd say this would be a profitable endeavor, without hesitation or any reasonable doubt.


I like that idea. I need to sort myself out and do something like this. I might do the same thing with crypto related domain names.

I looked at LoyceV's thread, and the concept is good, but it seems to be a passive investment vehicle. Given the volatility of crypto currencies, I think one needs to monitor the performance of the alts. I don't like the idea of investing Bitcoin either. I would rather hold the Bitcoin, and maybe use the profits on the alts ( if any ) to increase my Bitcoin holding. I think it wiil also need to be discussed in a private forum, if one is postulating a possible investment. Individual holdings might be a better idea as well, especially as people may have different ideas.
o_e_l_e_o
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 1907



View Profile
September 09, 2018, 06:52:37 AM
Merited by suchmoon (4)
 #6

The Pharmacist is a good guy but he is a pessimist.

I would call it being a realist. For every ICO that gives 100x return, there are a thousand or more that will fail. Most of the altcoins that currently exist will fail.

The altcoin market is completely irrational at the moment. Shitcoins like BCH, EOS, TRON, XVG are worth billions of dollars. I agree there will still be an ICO or two that goes x100, but it will be impossible to predict those coins based on them having a good product or utility. It will be pure chance and speculation.
Don Pedro Dinero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 285



View Profile
September 09, 2018, 07:04:43 AM
Last edit: September 09, 2018, 07:27:03 AM by Don Pedro Dinero
 #7

Better to do that in a bull market, not right now, simply because the chances that you hit the jackpot in a bull market are much higher. Also, if I did that, I would buy more than just 1$, as The Pharmacist and Bill Gator say, always making sure that the total amount you spend in the different coins is something that you can afford to lose, and that you really don’t mind losing it at all.

The only way to get massive gains is to go for the low cap coins that can grow exponentially.  

That’s a good way to lose everything you bet, when those shitcoins go to zero.

I GUARANTEE we will still see coins do 100x-1000x again.

I’m hurrying up to buy shitcoins.

The point is which ones are going to do that.

For every ICO that gives 100x return, there are a thousand or more that will fail. Most of the altcoins that currently exist will fail.

The altcoin market is completely irrational at the moment. Shitcoins like BCH, EOS, TRON, XVG are worth billions of dollars. I agree there will still be an ICO or two that goes x100, but it will be impossible to predict those coins based on them having a good product or utility. It will be pure chance and speculation.

Totally agree. For me, that's similar to saying: I'm going to bet for one number in the roulette because I can get 35×. Yeah! But you always have less than 1 in 35 odds of hitting the number.

When you are betting, like in this case, it all comes down to the knowledge of the asset you are buying, and the market. The more you know about an asset and about the market, the more you are investing. The less you know, the more you are gambling. I would include here knowledge about investment strategies and choosing the best one for your personal situation depending on age, net worth, income, previous portfolio allocation, etc.

As for shitcoins in particular, it is better to do research and to chose the ones you believe have strong projects but you are still gambling because the market is highly volatile and speculative.



TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 1286


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2018, 10:45:15 AM
 #8

1. Active development preferably from people with a track record in blocktech
2. Active community
3. Growing infrastructure (retailers accepting it, exchanges, use cases, support structure)
4. Coin count/total coins issued, I prefer hard caps but some inflationary coins are useful for speculation
5. Try to aim for high count low cap coins, but not at the expense of the other traits you are looking for. This means more risk but more reward potential.
6. Solid network protocol - technical and security aspects are solid
7. A unique use case utility

These are some of the primary things I look for in smaller cap coins.
paxmao
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 433


Spanish Community Translation and Strategy review


View Profile
September 21, 2018, 02:30:20 PM
 #9

...
could one expect a success rate of better than 1 in 10?
...

One in ten is a huge chance of success in Venture Capital for such projects. Perhaps one of the first signs of having a competent team behind the coin, at least in marketing, is that the coin will not be undervalued.
bitmover
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 699



View Profile
September 22, 2018, 02:47:40 AM
 #10

Better to do that in a bull market, not right now, simply because the chances that you hit the jackpot in a bull market are much higher.

That's right. However, some ICO are having success even in this bear market, such as Ontology.


In this thread, I'm not looking for members to spam coin suggestions, but I would like a discussion on the general concept of speculating in extremely low cost coins, and the points one should consider when evaluating them.

I saw an interesting classification few days ago in a video:

1 - Protocol coins
2 - Utility Tokens
3 - Security tokens

He said that protocol coins would be those such as Ethereum, NEO, Waves, Cardano, EOS... they are a plataform where it is possible to build  tokens on, such as Utility and Security Tokens.

He mentioned that utility tokens are coins that may have some use in the future, and they are delivering an especific service, such as BAT for example (an ERC20 token built inside a browser with an AdBlock that allows users to receive coins when watching ads).

THere are hundreds of utility tokens.

Utility tokens are double risky. If the plataform where they are build fail, the utility will also fail. So, thinking this way, protocol coins would be a safer bet (Eth, NEO, EOS, etc).

Security tokens I don't remember much from the video, but he said that they were coins which were backed by real world assets, and would be less risky than utility tokens. I don't remember an example now.

THere are some utility tokens that may go beyond their protocol, such as Oracles, for example. There are quite a few oracles out there.

I don't know how some coins like XRP fit in this model.

My portofolio is about 60-70% bitcoin, 25% protocol and 5-10% utility tokens.


I liked his model of classification and I think it can be useful.
ETFbitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1766

Use SegWit and enjoy lower fees.


View Profile WWW
September 23, 2018, 04:24:10 PM
 #11

If the success rate really 1 in 10, i'm sure many people would invest their money like there's no tomorrow Tongue

IMO there's big dilemma in investing coins/token since advertising is the biggest reason for coin/token successfulness (at least on short term), not it's technology, usage or competent developer behind it. XVG is the prime example where it's follower totally blind, the developer is incompetent (can't even implement other's technology properly) and the price sometimes rise after critical attack.
On the other hand, it's difficult to find underrated coin/token with features that actually needed or can be used well. Coin with zerocoin protocol is the recent example.

Also, please don't look for coins based on it's price since supply cap and market cap play bigger roles.
LFC_Bitcoin
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1672


One of the world's leading Bitcoin-powered casinos


View Profile
November 08, 2018, 07:00:04 PM
 #12

I think Loyce set up a group of people here some time ago, the idea was for 10-15 people (more if possible) to all invest something like $25 worth of BTC & each individual person picks an obscure shitcoin to invest in (Loyce collected the money & invested for them).

12 months later they split the profits (if there were any).

It wasn’t a lot of money but you never know do you, some shitcoin might go x 100.

Edit - Just read further up, you’re already aware of Loyce’s thing duhh!
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1498
Merit: 3844


Self-made Legendary outside Meta!


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2018, 07:20:37 PM
Merited by paxmao (3), bitmover (1)
 #13

I looked at LoyceV's thread, and the concept is good, but it seems to be a passive investment vehicle. Given the volatility of crypto currencies, I think one needs to monitor the performance of the alts.
I'd like to run another version of LoyceV's Legendary 10 Month 10 Person 10 Altcoin Investment Roller Coaster #2 with more active voting on what to buy and sell while it's active, but I still haven't figure out a good way to do so yet.
If you create one as a shared experiment, I'd like to join Smiley

Also, please don't look for coins based on it's price since supply cap and market cap play bigger roles.
This is the key indeed, although many (new) buyers seem to ignore the different in total supply and just go for the cheaper coin.
Take Doge for example: it's worth 0.34 cents, but there are 117 billion of them.
Finding the one coin with great potential while it's still cheap is like the holy grail of investing.
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1643


TEMP and VOM member and monderator.


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2018, 10:36:14 AM
Merited by bitmover (1)
 #14

I've got the domain name https://cryptocointree.com/. I put this up for sale, but it hasn't had any interest. I'd be happy to use that for such a project. I can add SMF to create a closed forum for pre-investment discussions, and a few public pages to list post investment decisions and comments. If I add a few affiliate links to those pages, that would cover admin costs, and it would meant that all the profits from the pool could be shared amongst the members.

We would need discussions about wallets and payment methods though.
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1498
Merit: 3844


Self-made Legendary outside Meta!


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2018, 10:44:21 AM
Merited by paxmao (1)
 #15

I've got the domain name https://cryptocointree.com/. I put this up for sale, but it hasn't had any interest.
Why not use OneCentCryptoCoins.com, just like the original title of this topic? I'm surprised it's still available!
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1643


TEMP and VOM member and monderator.


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2018, 11:12:54 AM
Last edit: November 11, 2018, 10:34:10 AM by Jet Cash
Merited by paxmao (2)
 #16

I've got a bit of a problem with domain names - I've got too many, and I've just picked up BitcoinOpera.com. Opera has just announced a crypto web wallet as part of their Android browser, and I need to look into that at some time. Also, one cent in the name could turn out to be a bit restrictive.

I've got too many CMS packages installed on my hosting, so I decided to add the crypto coin tree prelim discussions to my Net Barons fake forum site - https://netbarons.com/  I don't mind chucking $50 into a speculative pool to get theings started.

I might try this for myself if nobody wants to start a pool. My first obstacle is to work out how to fund purchases without using a bank account or Bitcoin. This is not for secrecy, but because I don't want to spend any Bitcoin, and I don't want to associate my bank accounts with crypto transactions.
xtraelv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 1146


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
November 13, 2018, 05:42:59 AM
 #17

Satoshi = USD $0.0000640365

https://99bitcoins.com/satoshi-usd-converter/

What is the fascination with $0.01 stocks / crypto ?

You can have 100 billion shitcoins @ $0.01 or $1 billion shitcoins @ $1 still equals $1 billion unrealistic market cap.

At the end of the day it is still a shitcoin.


Marketcap and utility are far more important. Look for a low market cap coin that has good practical use and lots of active development and a positive community.

Unrealistic market cap = no room for growth.
Practical use = potential good investment
Active development = value being added
Positive community = no Charles Manson type cult that will consider criticism FUD that deserves instant chatroom culling. Coins that discuss issues in an adult type manner use the constructive criticism to improve the roadmap.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVZxjVJz4ds



bitmover
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 699



View Profile
November 13, 2018, 03:36:22 PM
 #18


Unrealistic market cap = no room for growth.
Practical use = potential good investment
Active development = value being added
Positive community = no Charles Manson type cult that will consider criticism FUD that deserves instant chatroom culling. Coins that discuss issues in an adult type manner use the constructive criticism to improve the roadmap.


I agree with you about marketcap. That's the most important indicator.
A practical use is obviously a good indicator, but if the marketcap is too big, it's a potential bad investment, such as EOS.

Personally, I believe community support is useless. Successful companies doesn't need community support. What is Satander community support, for example?

Do you really need bounties and fake bots to shill a good project? That's most of what community support is about. Personally, I have participated in many ICOs. But I have never invested in a Ico that promoted a bounty, where they give away tokens to bots and spammers.

There are some top50 coins which barely do any marketing. Those are the ones I see as the most interesting projecta. Hype is not sustainable. And hype keep prices high, only to later on collapse
vit05
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 519



View Profile WWW
November 13, 2018, 04:01:39 PM
Merited by LoyceV (1)
 #19

I believe that instead of looking at the individual value of each currency, you should look through the marketcap. Even if you do not consider it a good comparison, it is the simplest.

Therefore, I would consider projects that are worth less than 10 million in marketcap today.


  • Coins that are exchanged in at least 1 large exchange.
  • Having well-known developers
  • Have at least 1 known investor or director
  • Have an ANN topic on BitcoinTalk that is not tainted with bots or spam
  • Have a busy and always updated Git
  • Have a clear roadmap with short, medium and long term goals.
  • No promises out of reality.
  • liquidity to buy and sell

You can use bitscreener to put some parameters. I put coins that are worth less than 10 million in mktcap, that have been in existence for more than 3 months and with a negotiated volume of more than 10,000.
xtraelv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 1146


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
November 14, 2018, 12:21:58 AM
Merited by bitmover (1)
 #20


Unrealistic market cap = no room for growth.
Practical use = potential good investment
Active development = value being added
Positive community = no Charles Manson type cult that will consider criticism FUD that deserves instant chatroom culling. Coins that discuss issues in an adult type manner use the constructive criticism to improve the roadmap.


I agree with you about marketcap. That's the most important indicator.
A practical use is obviously a good indicator, but if the marketcap is too big, it's a potential bad investment, such as EOS.

Personally, I believe community support is useless. Successful companies doesn't need community support. What is Satander community support, for example?

Do you really need bounties and fake bots to shill a good project? That's most of what community support is about. Personally, I have participated in many ICOs. But I have never invested in a Ico that promoted a bounty, where they give away tokens to bots and spammers.

There are some top50 coins which barely do any marketing. Those are the ones I see as the most interesting project. Hype is not sustainable. And hype keep prices high, only to later on collapse


I think you misunderstood the "positive community" comment.

If you read my comments carefully you'll notice it was anti-shilling.
Communities that have open and honest dialogue are important for startup and evolving coins.

Coins will face technical challenges along the way.

Often communities can become so invested that they see any criticism as FUD.

I agree that HYPE does not make a coin.  

However - a toxic community that will censor any discussion that they consider FUD -  can kill a potentially good coin / concept.

Shills, shill BOTS, Hype, Pump and dump are the bad side of crypto. As investors wisen up - they will become more aware of it and it will have a lesser effect.

A positive community can also work on getting actual vendor support.




Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!