Quality over Quantity in the bounty game

[chandrarahmadewa]

Yes, it's a good strategy to find a good Bounty. Don't waste your time and energy on a scam project. Take our time to research projects before being involved carefully.

..
I monitor every project that hits this board (which is a ton).  Guess how many bounties I have entered thus far?  ZERO.  They are all absolute shit. 
..

if you have experience, it is beneficial to find a good Bounty

[1714052125]

1714052125

[1714052125]

1714052125

[1714052125]

1714052125

[1714052125]

1714052125

[1714052125]

1714052125

[Sarisang]

examine or analyze it is obliged to do. It is sufficient to determine whether the measures undertaken could produce or just a trick of course. too much popping, of course, requires far more selective to avoid scam which is also more and more present in the bounty.

[jouns]

Last week I started a new way of doing bounties.  Quality over quantity.  I decided I was going to research the projects before I got involved very thoroughly.  I wanted to check the project team.  See if the idea was good and original.  I wanted to check everythign out before I spent any more time doing these damn bounties for shit projects and scams.  

I monitor every project that hits this board (which is a ton).  Guess how many bounties I have entered thus far?  ZERO.  They are all absolute shit.  

I ask you guys to research before you enter your next bounty and ask yourself this question.  Is this project really worth it or am I wasting my time?

In fact, I agree with you, today I promote only 10 projects in social networks. Although my experience proves the opposite - it happened that projects in the success of which I didn't believe brought revenue and projects with very good ratings didn't collect soft cap, analysis doesn't always work.

[fulled]

For me, i just apply on every bounty with good rating, some turn to scam ico at the end, but almost all my bounties was paid me good, even i just sold 25% from every reward ive get

[melander81]

As of now, there are really a lot of these scam ICOs that does not even get their tokens listed on an exchange. It seems the ICO game is almost over and we are moving over to a new format of getting support from investors.

[makishart]

Last week I started a new way of doing bounties.  Quality over quantity.  I decided I was going to research the projects before I got involved very thoroughly.  I wanted to check the project team.  See if the idea was good and original.  I wanted to check everythign out before I spent any more time doing these damn bounties for shit projects and scams. 

I monitor every project that hits this board (which is a ton).  Guess how many bounties I have entered thus far?  ZERO.  They are all absolute shit. 

I ask you guys to research before you enter your next bounty and ask yourself this question.  Is this project really worth it or am I wasting my time?

In fact, I agree with you, today I promote only 10 projects in social networks. Although my experience proves the opposite - it happened that projects in the success of which I didn't believe brought revenue and projects with very good ratings didn't collect soft cap, analysis doesn't always work.

Because any data can be manipulated and remember about how the ico rating site was accepting payment system to manipulate the rating. It's so annoying for me personally.
But it looks so difficult to search the bounty that will have quality over quantity because we know that any projects are developing the same idea.

[Bounty_Hunter]

Sometimes, even a bad project can collect a soft cap and you get a lot of tokens for the bounty. It's like a lottery, there's no room for analysis.

[bitok_1979]

Yes, the analysis takes time, especially now, but there is no guarantee that you will go into a worthwhile project, so it's easier to just take what you like and do your job

[Hanebel]

Though you are being criticized with your "zero" statement, your overall statement makes sense to me. Well, I don't agree with the "zero" but I would say joining a project as a bounty hunter should be researched and studied first. It's better to endorse only one good project than a hundred of shit ICOs.

[Gabmot]

This is absolutely not really true. I wanna believe you have only based this assertion of yours on a personal experience which if you have even taken enough precautions, you might have avoided this your Zero ish issue. Since this is the problem and you know, just as you highlighted, you can help your self to qualitative campaigns where you get an assurance of earning better.

[sourish]

Its a pleasure to promote something you believe in, but when it comes to campaigns, quantity works for most people.

[betece777]

I see also in the past few months many scam projects and projects that stopped when IOO disappointed us as our haunted bounties spent time and had no results, four months to five months after ico they stopped wasting a lot of time and also electricity internet costs as well no compensation for that

[Andrey13101991]

Until now, I am surprised by people who decided that without making any effort they will be able to earn money. In most cases, such people lose their money. To earn participating in bounty campaigns it is necessary to do a large amount of work on the analysis of the project, the team and their activities.

[Revvo1]

First and foremost, I must say your assertion isn't that construed well much. For the benefit of not raising fear in people's mind, I think it's best if you avoid fud by claiming everything bounty campaigns over the past few months have amounted to nothing. The implications this kind of assertion will have negative wise cannot be over looked especially in connection to people just coming into the game.

For the sake of avoiding quantity for quality as you have done well to input by the way, I wanna just recommend a way i have known and has worked perfectly fine for me. That is joining to a credible/transparent bounty team on telegram. Doing this, I think it will help. It has worked perfectly fine for me, I think it should work for anyone.

[zxl912157]

It is true that we also do not want to spend the important time we have just to follow the SCAm bounty campaign.
Maybe it's better to keep asking the Facebook Bounty group and keep asking the Bounty Manager.

[hanxinvwang]

I think you are right, because most of the current bounty activities are shit, because the number of fraudsters is increasing, but good projects still exist, which requires you to analyze carefully!

[sky9314]

But how do you define the quality of a project? What do you use to identify so-called high quality projects?
I think this is the most difficult. Everyone has a different understanding of the project. Maybe I think a good project, you will feel it is bad.

[clarkt]

It is important to know exactly what you are supporting in a project. One must be able to answer the question of how relevance will a project been supported be in the scheme of things in cryptocurrency and beyond.

[aces777]

This is what I try to look out for when I am signing up for bounties, you could sign up for a bounty that gives you a lot of coins but when the coins are not worth anything then it is a waste. It is better that you get paid a small amount of coins but the coins are worth a good deal than getting paid a lot of coins which you cannot use for anything.

[r_delossa]

You are absolutely right. Hunters need to make a good investigation, before participating in any project. They should read the whitepaper, look at the community in Telegram, search for reviews or interesting articles and only if you are sure, you can participate.