[ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest

[Rabinovitch]

List of SUQA mining pools with live stats & hashrate distribution

https://miningpoolstats.stream/suqa

Only 3 pools seems active

Feel free to join to minermore.com pool. Let's distribute the SUQA hashrate.

[1576137073]

1576137073

[1576137073]

1576137073

[Rabinovitch]

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

Check Youtube for that.

[SUQAFOUNDATION]

SUQA Mac Wallet is released. https://github.com/SUQAORG/SUQA-CORE/releases/tag/v1.0

[JayDiCee]

Dev fee is too much, this is the biggest reason for deception claims.
These claims would not be too much if the dev fee rate was lower.
I dug up a bit, I switched to ravencoin mining. Ravencoin is safer.

Have you skipped over the part that there is no ICO or Pre-Mine or even the part that the Dev-Fee is locked to make sure the DEVs actually keep working on the project?
There is also a nice breakdown on what the Dev-Fee will be spent on. I think you may also want check on the Dev's of this Coin and with a little bit of research you may find that one of them have been tied to other successful projects (XCN) as well.

[skeletounek]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

[uralcryptocoin]

...

Check Youtube for that.

Checked, interesting info. Trend continues. Like with Maxwell cards vs Pascal we see ~40% improvement of Turing vs Pascal at practically the same power consumption. So it could be quite interesting for mining. Will wait price stabilization 

[pallas]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

[skeletounek]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

[cryptotamer01]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

A solid coin means good team with good support not price. Total Cap is 210 billion now but it was 700 billion in January. Look at the Market cap of XCN in January too. Prices increase or decrease the most important thing is when crypto goes mainstream with trillions of dollars of market cap, then the solid coins with good teams and support like XCN will have hundreds of millions of dollars of Market Cap. Considering our rapid growth i don't know where SUQA will be when the trillion dollars market cap arrives

[chrysophylax]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

[skeletounek]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

[chrysophylax]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx

[karlo-fan]

How to mine SUQA with only 1 or 2 cards on my AMD rig? What is the example for bat file?
I use zjazz_amd_win64_1.1 miner.

[gorkemg]

How to mine SUQA with only 1 or 2 cards on my AMD rig? What is the example for bat file?
I use zjazz_amd_win64_1.1 miner.

Add -d 0 -d 1 to your batch file  or whatever your amd cards order like.

[Newminer2018]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx

Very well said....

[kurniawanj]

Yo guys. The diff really2 goes to moon even block hasnt reach 22k which will halving reward but right now its feel like getting halving already lol...
Wish suqa all the best for us. And im glad if it doesn't come to exchanger for this month at least we will reach 22k block before we enter the market

[anhong]

Yo guys. The diff really2 goes to moon even block hasnt reach 22k which will halving reward but right now its feel like getting halving already lol...
Wish suqa all the best for us. And im glad if it doesn't come to exchanger for this month at least we will reach 22k block before we enter the market

yeah starting next week I expect rewards go down with another 50%. Nethash is increasing rapidly.

[JayDiCee]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx

Very well said....

Agreed. Poeople want to pump and dump and get rich quick but seem to forget that even bitcoin was not worth much in the beginning and its value is purely based on the trust miners/sellers/buyers have in it. But that sounds like how fiat works, a coin and paper money system based on trust.

[grendel25]

Suqa order books are now active at Injex.io!
Suqa's decision to be listed was successful, we have now opened the order books for trading!
Suqa has 1 active pair - SUQA_BTC

Trade here: Injex Market  - SUQA_BTC

This place is a scam.
Not responding to messages on discord,  support email is bouncing.
I tried making a withdrawl yesterday of some SUQA, and Today its not showing in my wallet, and my balance is gone.
Looks like they were waiting for enough BTC to be brought in before running.
DO NOT TRADE ON HERE.

This exchange has 0.03 BTC daily volumen 5 days ago very small exchange.... i use not.

I hope everyone has received the warning.  Injex is nothing more than cyber vandalism.  you may get lucky and get a few coins but if you risk more you will lose it and eventually what little assets that are on the site will disappear. 

They DO NOT have 10M SUQA for sale at prices 10 times cheaper than what is for sale through secure escrow.  This is what I mean by cyber vandalism.  INJEX IS NOTHING MORE THAN VANDALISM...

[cryptotamer01]

Please do not trust the not approved exchanges. We see that our members want to make trading and they try to use many ways like otc or unapproved exchanges. We will solve this soon and we will not wait until the first week of November. We are working on it.
Please be patient.