BITCOIN USAGE EXPERIMENT

[enterprevic2]

What if bitcoin is actually owned by the US Government, and the name Satoshi is just used to front the currency to make it anonymous, maybe its an underground project to study people's reaction to money or to help them make money in a short while?

[1713249672]

1713249672

[1713249672]

1713249672

[1713249672]

1713249672

[1713249672]

1713249672

[1713249672]

1713249672

[1713249672]

1713249672

[chennappa121]

I think about my view point the bitcoin is a centralise there is no country will be control the Bitcoins it will be controlled by communities like a miners and more and most of bitcoin miners from China more than 70% and the rest will be other countries like us Australia and more. So there is no way to control Bitcoins a single country like USA or any other.

[avikz]

People have actually come up with such theories in the past and some of them provided various proofs against it. Some claimed that bitcoin is an experiment by CIA as well. Some said, bitcoin is created by the Russian government as well. Please check the below link for one such news,

https://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/907323/Bitcoin-created-spy-US-government-CIA-MI5-secret-mission-fund-pay-price

However, I personally believe that no government will even do such experiment to make their own citizens richer than expected.  Governments are the believers of strict centralization, even though there are exceptions. At their current standpoint, it is conflicting to the interest to create something drastically different!

[cizatext]

I believe bitcoin to be a kind of magical tool in this generation because even the U S government can not own bitcoin because if they do there have been several point in bitcoin where it need intervention but had been left without any interventions from any body not even the US government or any individual. I still have a strong feelings that santoshi is just an abbreviation of so many name or community of people.

[jrrsparkles]

What if bitcoin is actually owned by the US Government, and the name Satoshi is just used to front the currency to make it anonymous, maybe its an underground project to study people's reaction to money or to help them make money in a short while?

Baiscally goernments don't want decentralization because it will be a problem for their own economy so why they need to make bitcoin?

It is just the idea from someone called satoshi to make revolution among the centralized banks who keep all of us like slaves at some point.

[SventraPapere]

Even if this is so, then I will not be surprised at anything. In our time, one can expect something especially from America. If it is a global experiment, then it is interesting for what it is specifically? And what does this all end with. I hope that this is not a bubble. with the rest we'll figure it out.

[wyplashdea]

Well, code is opened for everyone who wants to read it, BTC is like a book you can read. Who was the inventor...dont know, but a goverment sees like a very improbable case.

[Jannn]

Do you really think the US would run such a ridiculously large and expensive 'study'... What would be the benefit to it? Why would they let it get so large, and why would they have such hostile regulations against it if that's the case? Do you even think before you make such ridiculous suggestions? Bitcoin is simply an idea that has grown to unexpectedly huge heights, and is now taking on more utility than anybody expected.

[aoluain]

What if bitcoin is actually owned by the US Government, and the name Satoshi is just used to front the currency to make it anonymous, maybe its an underground project to study people's reaction to money or to help them make money in a short while?

I hope its just a language thing and that you dont really mean to use the word "owned".
No one person or organisation can own somerhing as decentralised as bitcoin.

Wallets are encrypted and transactions are confirmed by miners in various parts of the
world, not by a central entity.

It has been mentioned before that the US government or military "created" bitcoin, thats
different than "owning" it.

[KocaEfe]

First, I do not believe that bitcoin was created by the Americans.

Secondly, I remember when bitcoin was born. He was created in the era when he created PayPal, Alert Pay, Perfect Money, Okpay, Solidtrustpay and many others. At that time, all these first electronic money experienced one problem. Legality. Many banks did not want to work with these payment currencies. Only PayPal through the trading platform Ebay, received greater importance. And it was followed by other payment currencies. Around the same time (5 years and Satoshi Nakamoto published his white paper in which he spoke about the blockchain and bitcoin.

Third, America can not be the father of bitcoin, because this country does not produce bitcoin (mining), for example such as China. Then why not assume that Satoshi Nakamoto was Chinese and the Chinese government created bitcoin. Why not?

[dablatair]

Hello,

you will always have stange theories on origin and use of Bitcoin. But governments tests and control is really not possible. Governments are full for centralization and control of people. BTC is exactly the inverse, decentralized, accessible for everybody and free !

[Muheng]

What if bitcoin is actually owned by the US Government, and the name Satoshi is just used to front the currency to make it anonymous, maybe its an underground project to study people's reaction to money or to help them make money in a short while?

it is so impossible to say like that, if bitcoin is owned by US Government, they can manipulate bitcoin and bitcoin never been decentralized, they can change the supply and also they never ban using of bitcoin on the US

[Pipirillo]

It doesn't make sense since this is too democratic....

[rodskee]

What if bitcoin is actually owned by the US Government, and the name Satoshi is just used to front the currency to make it anonymous, maybe its an underground project to study people's reaction to money or to help them make money in a short while?

This correct and to solve these doubt about this question only one people can answer
The creator of the bitcoin or the digital cryptocurrency need to show his identity
But thhe prolem is how to secure their lives showing itself into the public

[kawetsriyanto]

What if bitcoin is actually owned by the US Government, and the name Satoshi is just used to front the currency to make it anonymous, maybe its an underground project to study people's reaction to money or to help them make money in a short while?

Before you stated the speculation above, you should think about some questions firstly:
~Why do you think the US Government (Not the other government)? You should have a specific reason to claim it. Do you find sufficient accurate evidence?
~What the big reason, you can say this is indicated as an underground project? Do you think it is necessary for government to study the people reaction about money?

You cannot state something without a strong reason. For this case, you only ask a statement without sufficient evidence. I think this discussion is only about a personal opinion and seems pointless. Sorry to say that..  

[haidil]

I believe bitcoin does not belong to America, and Satoshi is just a name. Bitcoin is just an idea that has grown very unexpectedly unexpectedly, and now benefits more than anyone expected.