KYC for bounty hunters Yes or No

[kleeck]

No, of course no.

I can accept if bounty announce it at the start. But i find them dishonest, when they do this at the end. I feel like, they try to reduce the budget with this way.

[1713560893]

1713560893

[1713560893]

1713560893

[Kick]

KYC for bounty hunters isn't important. So I don't support KYC for Bounty Hunter. I think KYC is needed for people who invest, not from bounty hunters. For bounty hunters proof of authentication is enough to cover the KYC. Because the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

[Abigail Asi]

KYC for bounty hunters isn't that necessary because most bounty campaigns don't request that though it helps eradicate and minimise fake accounts.  It also maintains sanity in the project.

[fakegurutu]

hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

Its gonna be a nuisance for bounty hunters if KYC is required in a bounty campaign program. KYC should only be implemented to the investors because after all, they were the ones who were holding a massive tokens unlike bounty hunters who were only had just few tokens. Some bounty campaigns that has a KYC doesnt have a lots of bounty participants because simple bounty hunters dont like KYC.

[restuibu]

in my opinion KYC is only for investors because they have invested their money in ico and what you say is true for a proof of authentication is very sufficient but if it is a necessity in the claim of payment then there is no other way we have to do to claim our payment

[coffee_man]

I'm not a supporter of passing KYC. Initially, it would be correct to KYC procedure passed the creators of projects in order to avoid fraud.

[Fatunad]

hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

You do basically answered up your own question when it comes to KYC for bounty hunters which is right.When we do talk about those procedures those are only fitted on investors alone and i dont really
see the relevance why would a bounty hunter would need to comply such thing? This is why i do tend to pass out and seek informations about bounty that do requires it or not.I wont really have the plans on giving out
my details into tokens which doesnt even have an assurance to have a value or do end up on being a shitcoin.

[swetka]

in my opinion KYC is only for investors because they have invested their money in ico and what you say is true for a proof of authentication is very sufficient but if it is a necessity in the claim of payment then there is no other way we have to do to claim our payment

If we consider the reasons for which personal data are required to be provided to investors, then Bounty Hunters should not provide KYC, but the company’s ico developers should provide personal data to participants of the Bounty company. Sorry for the tautology ..

[Babayan]

I appreciate the idea of introducing KYC procedure for bounty hunters, because it prevents cheating from the bounty participants and allow to raise more funds for honest people.

[uniquark]

No, of course no.

I can accept if bounty announce it at the start. But i find them dishonest, when they do this at the end. I feel like, they try to reduce the budget with this way.

I totally agree with you, KYC for bounty hunter is not recommended. That makes them easily identifiable, and the internet age now is very dangerous

[zarintasnim]

KYC for bounty hunter i think it is right. Although bounty haunter are not customer their project. But ensure give payment right people to take KYC. Now days so many cheater are coming and they try to cheat there. KYC prevent such as act.

[Btcirene88]

I am favor with No, its not necessarily to submit KYC upon participating in a bounty signature or bounty related work of a project because they are already done with a lot of requirements to proof just to make sure there is no multiple account joining. And as i think only few bounty manager who implied that requirements in a thread.

[fathur01]

I don't support KIK. I think bounty hunters giving their data to anyone is pretty risky and therefore stupid.

[allohha]

I don't support KIK. I think bounty hunters giving their data to anyone is pretty risky and therefore stupid.

Recently, the requirement to provide personal data from members of the Bounty company has a specific goal to limit the number of participants. Nevertheless, there are still cases when these are the legal requirements of the state where the company is registered ico.

[take_off]

I am favor with No, its not necessarily to submit KYC upon participating in a bounty signature or bounty related work of a project because they are already done with a lot of requirements to proof just to make sure there is no multiple account joining. And as i think only few bounty manager who implied that requirements in a thread.

But I think if a bounty hunter gets too much money from joining the campaign of a bounty. The bounty manager should make sure KYC is correct

[valetrm]

A year has passed. I showed my passport last fall and winter to HUNDREDS of projects. And there were no problems with anyone. So I see no reason to be afraid of KYC.

[Noobaru]

No, in my opinion. Because why would they need hunter's personal information? Fake accounts and fraud can be checked with other simpler means. Bounty hunters are not investors, instead they earn some tokens in exchange for their work. I agree with KYC for investors.

[Patmille]

hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

just avoid any bounty campaign that require kyc because they are a waste of time. not all ico become successful and our personal details ids and selfies are in danger of being stolen and be used in other mischievous ways.  The first thing that i look when im joining a bounty is if there is kyc.

[Desscount]

hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

there is a lot of discussion about this, I guess I don't mind and there are many people who don't mind doing KYC even for bounty. there are many factors, one of which is to reduce farmers from using multiple accounts in each of their participation.

[D3m1r4wanti]

no, I strongly disagree with the implementation of KYC on bounty hunters, especially for participants in airdrops. the most important identity that we have must be exchanged for not-so-large income, maybe even just ending with a fake or fraudulent project