Satoshi Nakamoto's P2P foundation profile makes a reply

[coastermonger]

Forgive my ignorance but is it possible to fake the date a key was signed?  


sig  sig   7480B161 2013-04-01 __________ __________ Dorian S Nakamoto <mtn_sssh@hotmail.com>


http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x18C09E865EC948A1

Dorian's key was sel-signed in 2008.  So if dates are legit he's been on radar for quite some time.  Possible Satoshi picked him in advance to model his fake profile on?

google cache says ignore:

Good find, so Dorian Nakamoto did not in fact, have a key on that list.

[1714003121]

1714003121

[1714003121]

1714003121

[1714003121]

1714003121

[Cheena]

 

Right, good work bud, p.s can I have some of that premine?

just incase 
1aDc1eWYydpi8vmfhx3woYKd459Hdqz43

Fuck off you greedy begger there is no premine in Bitcoin

[The Avenger]

Amazing day.

Looking at it logically it would seem that Dorian is Satoshi.

my 2 satoshi's worth.

Wrong. Please send 2 satoshi's to the address in my sig.

Thanks
Satoshi Locomoto

[tokeweed]

His page says he is 38 years old BTW.

dorian nakamoto is 38. look at the pics of him.

[o3u]

Forgive my ignorance but is it possible to fake the date a key was signed?  


sig  sig   7480B161 2013-04-01 __________ __________ Dorian S Nakamoto <mtn_sssh@hotmail.com>


http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x18C09E865EC948A1

Dorian's key was sel-signed in 2008.  So if dates are legit he's been on radar for quite some time.  Possible Satoshi picked him in advance to model his fake profile on?

edit: it you can change the date on creation. post is irrelevant. probably a prank

Satoshi:

http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x18C09E865EC948A1

Dorian:

http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x1CB778227480B161

dates are the same?



----------------------
pub  1024D/7480B161 2008-10-30            
    Fingerprint=A38A 23B6 4A06 B089 12E9  794B 1CB7 7822 7480 B161

uid Dorian S Nakamoto <mtn_sssh@hotmail.com>
sig  sig3  7480B161 2008-10-30 __________ __________ [selfsig]

sub  1024g/34D8E81C 2008-10-30            
sig sbind  7480B161 2008-10-30 __________ __________ []

------------------------------------
pub  1024D/5EC948A1 2008-10-30            
    Fingerprint=DE4E FCA3 E1AB 9E41 CE96  CECB 18C0 9E86 5EC9 48A1

uid Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com>
sig  sig   5C5BF7A4 2001-03-23 __________ __________ John Titor
sig  sig3  5EC948A1 2008-10-30 __________ __________ [selfsig]
sig  sig   E2513C30 2009-01-03 __________ __________ Bitcoin Jesus
sig  sig   04143362 2011-11-01 __________ __________ lzsaver <lzsaver@gmail.com>
sig  sig   DAB591E7 2013-03-27 __________ __________ theymos <theymos+pgp@mm.st>
sig  sig   7480B161 2013-04-01 __________ __________ Dorian S Nakamoto <mtn_sssh@hotmail.com>
sig  sig   F2E50027 2013-04-19 __________ __________ Antony Bailey <support@antonybailey.net>
sig  sig   2346C9A6 2013-05-10 __________ __________ Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
sig  sig   FFDB1CCC 2013-07-01 __________ __________ []
sig  sig   F91975FE 2013-09-20 __________ __________ Cubaguy <cubaguy@gmail.com>
sig  sig   7471C2D0 2013-09-21 __________ __________ Harald Schilly <harald.schilly@gmail.com>
sig  sig1  67E4FA04 2013-10-12 __________ __________ Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
sig  sig   7B536415 2014-03-06 __________ __________ Satoshi Nakamoto (Resident of California) <satoshin@gmx.com>

sub  2048g/D6AAA69F 2008-10-30            
sig sbind  5EC948A1 2008-10-30 __________ __________ []

[cryptmebro]

Amazing day.

Looking at it logically it would seem that Dorian is Satoshi.

my 2 satoshi's worth.

Well, you're a gullible idiot.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto

[samesstee]

Right, good work bud, p.s can I have some of that premine?

just incase 
1aDc1eWYydpi8vmfhx3woYKd459Hdqz43

Fuck off you greedy begger there is no premine in Bitcoin

Bitcoin has such a soft launch the amount amassed by any one person with a normal computer mining even months after the launch would be in excess of any other common 'pre-mines' so in effect there kinda is, if you wanna get into the depths of it ......... The majority of bitcoins are so densely spread amongst the early adopters that if some % of this stash was given away now (like how the faucets were in 2012) it would probably be quite beneficial for bitcoin economy and growth in general.

no problem and have a nice day  

[tatterz]

I suppose "this" Satoshi Nakamoto is the equivalent of Bitcoin Jesus. We can now split Satoshism into a Jew and Christian division which will allow us all to become a legitimate 501(c)(3)! Praise the lord!

Maybe Newsweek's Satoshi is the "Anti-Nakamoto", signaling the end of times for bitcoin.

[naturecollision]

Two options here - My guess, Satoshi decided to go with Option A.

A) Satoshi is responding to the madness so that there is no more headaches for Dorian
B) Someone hacked into it or found an exploit to write that.

Ning was never a reliable platform even in the early days of the Ning Social network.

Satoshi needs to speak up in the forums of BitcoinTalk!

can a site admin to such a thing? maybe if paid well?

[tokeweed]

But what if Dorian just logged on at home and posted that comment?

then he is one super troll laughing his ass off right now.

[David M]

Satoshi Locomoto

So that is where CCMF comes from....

[overclock]

One does not simply unmask Satoshi. Proper planning ensures this.

[samesstee]

Satoshi:

http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x18C09E865EC948A1

Dorian:

http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x1CB778227480B161

dates are the same?

looks legit  

[thddx]

I was pretty angry when I read the Newsweek story this morning.  But, if it turns out that Dorian isn't Satoshi, it could be good news all-around:
- Dorian has to put up with a few days of nonsense but wins a lifetime of free lunches
- Bitcoin gets another media pump detracting from the Gox nonsense and pushing us to a new ATH
- Satoshi maintains his persona of mystery while reassuring the community of his vitality
- Newsweek gets bruised and battered and perhaps serves as a reminder to irresponsible journalists

[o3u]

Satoshi created a PGP key in 2008 - 10 - 30, same day as dorian
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=504715.msg5561082#msg5561082

edit: it you can change the date on creation. above post is irrelevant.

[closesat315am]

my favorite part is the name and date on this line

sig  sig   5C5BF7A4 2001-03-23 __________ __________ John Titor

from this page http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x18C09E865EC948A1

[mgburks77]

my favorite part is the name and date on this line

sig  sig   5C5BF7A4 2001-03-23 __________ __________ John Titor

from this page http://sks.pkqs.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x18C09E865EC948A1

lol

I didn't notice that.

[maco]

Two options here - My guess, Satoshi decided to go with Option A.

A) Satoshi is responding to the madness so that there is no more headaches for Dorian
B) Someone hacked into it or found an exploit to write that.

Ning was never a reliable platform even in the early days of the Ning Social network.

Satoshi needs to speak up in the forums of BitcoinTalk!

can a site admin to such a thing? maybe if paid well?

I don't remember if that was a possibility. I've used Ning for many reasons back in the days because Ning forums were very popular back in the days, up until they started charging forum owners for it.  I do remember Ning not giving admins that much access in the first place about a year or two later, you had to pay to keep your forums up or something of that nature.  Other than forum modifications, banning users, etc. I don't know if this account was controlled by an admin or not, but it could be possible.

The post url from today does match up to his original profile url posted back in 2009

Same url: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/m/profile?screenName=0ye0gncqg772o

We know it is the same account- so it has to be either A) it is really him speaking up or B) it was hacked or controlled by someone else.

[mechatronic]

DSM thanks you

[simonk83]

I KNEW I WAS RIGHT!

Yes that was the important part.  Not the fact that none of Satoshi's accounts have been active for more than two years and there was a post by one of them in the last thirty minutes.

Well after some idiot was spreading FUD in another thread and trash-talking me for being right, sure I can say that.

One thing to add. The search parameters have been narrowed, we know the location, we can find him now if need be. I suggest Satoshi to anonymize ASAP.

Yep, there's no way he just added "Resident of California" to that string to throw anyone off or anything.  Why would he right!

Silly internetz.