Improvements in Bounty Campaigns

[jacee]

The question is : What would you change or might add to make it more reliable or interesting?

Maybe we need some criteria to be a bounty manager,the copper membership or campaign run on their own will not be allowed to manage campaigns.

Copper membership does not make someone more reliable as a bounty manager. Most campaigns that don't have any reputable campaign manager is also not that popular. Participant look for an experienced bounty manager.One thing I can think of to make bounty campaigns better is to have them escrow the same amount of bounty they are offering in eth. In that way, even if the project turned out to be a scam, there's still some funds in escrow to pay the participants.

[1715505098]

1715505098

[1715505098]

1715505098

[1715505098]

1715505098

[1715505098]

1715505098

[Btc_1856]

Yes, Bounty managers should take the funds before accepting any proposal because after raising money many companies are talking very long time to distribute the bounties and sometimes the companies not even responding to the manager and to the participants for payments. So community management should come up with a different solution in order to be in safe.

[dodgrad]

The question is : What would you change or might add to make it more reliable or interesting?

Maybe we need some criteria to be a bounty manager,the copper membership or campaign run on their own will not be allowed to manage campaigns.

Copper membership does not make someone more reliable as a bounty manager. Most campaigns that don't have any reputable campaign manager is also not that popular. Participant look for an experienced bounty manager.One thing I can think of to make bounty campaigns better is to have them escrow the same amount of bounty they are offering in eth. In that way, even if the project turned out to be a scam, there's still some funds in escrow to pay the participants.

Escrow would be the best, but is it possible in practice..(?) I don't think so.. Hopefully someday it will be standard.

I agree with this three suggestions:

Red trusted BMs shouldn't be allowed to manage campaigns.
Reports should be made on forms, not here on the forum.
There should be rewards for whoever finds scamming hunters in a campaign.

Reports in forms outside the forum - less spam
Elimination of red trust users and reward for finding spammer/scammer - that's also good ideas

[arpon11]

To participate in bounties campaigns and makes some tokens or coins you must follow the bounty terms and conditions.  Most of the managers and projects owners has their rules and they may like you to follow their rules strictly.  Most people participate in campaign and they did not get rewards because of not following the rules.
Your account most be up-to Jr. Member level, However the high your ranks the more stakes you make.  Therefore, what it takes you as a newbies or Jr.  Member to makes in 2 months is what hero or sr. Member make in a week.

Red trusted BMs shouldn't be allowed to manage campaigns.
Reports should be made on forms, not here on the forum.
There should be rewards for whoever finds scamming hunters in a campaign.

Some of the red trust member are genuine and I think some of them were managing campaigns professionally before this time.

[TheBeardedBaby]

Since this thread is bumped again, I'll just add the thread I started some time ago for to report
Campaign Managers accepting shitposters
Is not very popular at the moment but I think with the time this will change. If we get control over the management of the bounties and add a bit of control the spam problem will be greatly reduced.

[Findingnemo]

Add some requirements to be a campaign managers is what I would like to add because lot of newbies were become bounty managers and ends up running scam projects so they need to have knowledge about evaluating ICOs before managing it.