That's the goal isn't it? Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are aiming to improve the world as best they can, obviously it will be difficult and mistakes will be made, but these mistakes shouldn't define the entire industry. Over time, the politicians will realise the utility of crypto, and it will be impossible for them to crack down on it without risking their position.
You misunderstood the whole thing. "Do no harm" is mainly a legal terminology to resolve internal conflicts that is used in contracts or SOWs between two parties. If you ever get a chance to see a signed SOW between two corporates, you will find this clause. This particular legal clause is used extensively all over the world.
I have just read the article and it doesn't cover the idea very well. The major questions now are,
1. Who will be the beneficiary of this clause?
2. Who will get the benefit of doubt?
"Do no harm" is only useful if executed properly and ethically, otherwise thise words have no value!