Why can not I trust ICO-ratings?

[nekorakoeora]

Sometimes something that instant was not yet well enough to be felt. and this might be worthy of a rating site is said to exist. Maybe I will say a little rough that believe the site rating is a tricking the public. Since the beginning of may be better and love towards the analysis because it will be much more rewarding in results.

[1715114101]

1715114101

[1715114101]

1715114101

[1715114101]

1715114101

[1715114101]

1715114101

[escalante28]

That is absolutely true. Icobench now obviously accepting payment for a good rating to give. We can't trust them anymore because of the corruption in it. There should be someone who is going to make a good ico website review that can't be manipulate by the ICO team members but that is so impossible. lol. Everything in crypto can be paid and that is the reality.

[oxoxoxox]

The main reason I don't trust ICO ratings is that I think they may have an economic relationship with ICO merchants. Of course, this is just my personal guess!

[ranggenga]

I don't really know how an ICO rating sites work, cause sometime i read a message in a new thread of project's ANN saying that the project is listed in that ico rating site and asking the one responsible about the project to follow up that listing. I think that is a bit obvious, An ICO rating should be independent and give a rating on their own.

[Lerikaweb]

The main reason I don't trust ICO ratings is that I think they may have an economic relationship with ICO merchants. Of course, this is just my personal guess!

these rating websites, as well as all the other ones of such type, were created in order to offer the promotion service to various companies. The more you pay, the better place you have. Everything is clear, it is pure marketing.

[RoftheN]

You cannot trust the ico ratings because they can be paid. That is one thing that we have to know as humans is that every one has a price and these people who run the ico ratings websites can be paid to give good ratings to a scam project just to get people to put money in it. it is always better to take out some time yourself and do your research yourself

[erushin.antony]

Ratings cannot be trusted. All ratings cost nothing now. Pay money for all ratings of a campaign and they not the presents.

[coin-investor]

This has become a business if the hyip has a monitor to check if the hyip are still paying we now have ICO rating to check if the ico is legit they don't differ you will need to pay them to get a good rating for your ICO you want to know then check those failed ICO they've got good rating.

[kickdapa]

I support the idea of analyzing and choosing projects by yourself only. Nobody knows the truth and only your predicted trends will help you to make the right decision which will minimize losses and maximize profit.

Well way back a year a go which the forum is clean and just very informative the ico rating sort of they tend to always gives you right information but right now mostly of it is those ico rating sites is being paid by those Team of the ICO to put their token on their website and rate it high sort of it is a good token that is the happening right now so i do agree on you that it is good choice if you analyze by your self the ICO

There was a lot of thief have created such a scammy ico rating site for the marketing purpose only and it can't be tolerated. A high rating in the ico rating site can't be trusted and i have seen someone has created a medium post about that. DYOR is always become the best choice to determine how good the ico is.

Though ICO ratings are not everything, And day by day ICO rating websites, Apps are coming incredibly. The number of ICO ratings websites are huge now. But Everyone is not a scammer in the world, but everyone wants to earn money too! I like icobench, their rating system is very wise. They are greedy also in some ways, but still their most of the good rating ICO is doing well in the crypto market.

[JCO05]

It is simply because all ratings are just based on the predictions of the majority and nothing is constant when it comes on the future lf the projects in the market. For example, there are projects that are having high ICO rate but is not succeeding and there those which are not that popular but is still manage to reach its hardcap on crowdsale.

[ljane]

Now there have been so many ICO rating sites and I think not all of them are genuine therefore giving your trust to them is not somehow good. Some are doing good but others are not.

[KuyaBreezy]

I have always suspected that this was the case, now with your investigation, I can use evidence when someone wants to refute my theory, thank you for so long investigation, is that at first sight is obvious that a centralized system like this can be violated by the greed of people, so we have to be careful in whom we put our trust.

[anahata]

I always felt that many of the so called sites get some money or other rewards from the ICO team to post ratings, after all they gotta need to eat too. Easy way to find out is to check if most of the ratings are above 4/5 or 8/10.

[Coltpython]

You can't trust them because they are humans like you who went out of their way to make their own research and personal review of crypto projects. Them being humans means they are subject to vices like bribes and can be influenced to make reviews that will favour the project in order to fool investors.

[grifinmch]

the site rating many depicting the true state of affairs is not. This is, of course, tantamount to fraud analysis that will culminate in unexpected results. analysis and research of its own much more benefit for sure. a lot of knowledge which can be understood in terms of these and not just the end result only in the form of profit that can be obtained.

[cryptoblue77]

There are reports that many ICO projects have been bribing these rating sites to increase their product rating, so they can't be trusted. These ratings are not genuine and they got it in exchange of money. So, I would recommend everyone to do their own research instead of relying on these rating sites.

[bayupermana]

Rating is one part of ICO but a lot of other factors are to be checked before taking any decision to invest in an ICO because you know that everything can be manipulated by money power. Never believe in these things and always do your own research as that will give you much better information.

[Nisansala]

Nowadays, there are many ICO rating site. But most of them are trust less. Therefore, i'm recommended you to do own simple research before joining the ICOs

[giogio0504]

Why not you can, but you cannot trust all of them. It should be admitted that  a a lot of popular ratings are paid, but there are some not so popular but more real and not paid platforms, that are trustworthy. I would recommend www.icoguide.com this is favorite portal of big investors.

[Pasadoble]

This paid rates have very bad influence all over the market, and this harms the ICO industry not giving to the good ideas the opportunity to live.