I could refute these arguments, since many of these sentences were taken from context, therefore, with intent precisely on catching people who do not know the general context. <
Apparently you're one of them> of the subjects, and many of these phrases are some of the cliché phrases that Brazilian socialists used to create a scarecrow from the Bolsonaro and hit him. I'll cite some examples for you to understand what I'm talking about, but first, don't think I'm here defending Bolsonaro, I'm just clarifying facts for the correct understanding of how things are.
As soon as you hear this, you think, ours how someone would do something like that, a monster, no? But he was in an interview, and she called him a rapist implicitly, obviously an unfounded accusation without fundamentals, just by provocation, so he who does not measure his words too, fought back provoking also and said that she was too ugly to rape herself. And she bounces and says ' ' I hope not, for I give you a slap ' ' and soon after he answered ' ' gives I give you another ' ' and calls her a slut, yes slut, and right after receiving this offense, she goes into shock and finds it an absurd , but first, calling someone a rapist would be normal. The two sides are wrong, my point is: see how you only compose a small piece of the occurred that only benefits only one side?
Here's the complete video of what happened, to get your doubts Bolsonaro once told a fellow lawmaker that she was too ugly to rape.
Phrase to put afraid:
He has promised to stock his cabinet with military officers.
Reality: Yes, he appointed a few military personnel, but in areas he thinks they are able to cope and has experience, something similar to the intervention in Rio de Janeiro, where whoever took over the post were military and internally the service was of total bankruptcy, for something reasonably sustainable.
Phrase to put afraid:
further militarize Brazilian society and bring even more violence to Brazil
Reality: He wants to release the possession of weapons, and socialists as they can only let the state have weapons to kill you and you be defenseless, so absurd. OBS: So you Americans who have the possession of legal weapons, must be a complete chaos, like the Old West, LOL.
Don't you see how it looks like partisan? being reproduced by people? More propaganda you're replaying.
During a campaign stop last week, he called for gunning down members of the PT, as the Workers’ Party is known.
Here for example what he meant was: we cannot treat her case as an exceptionally urgent case and continue treating the rest of the population who also dies, as if it were a statistical number, that is, we have to investigate everyone in the same way.
But out of context, we already know that this is not going to work
Bolsonaro excused the death of Marielle Franco, the black, queer Rio de Janeiro city councilwoman who was assassinated in March, as “just another death in Rio de Janeiro.
Again, let us look at where the argument is found, in 1999, of one thing that he has already stated nowadays that he no longer thinks, again, another thing that does not contemplate reality. So I'm going to stop here and when you criticize someone, try to at least differentiate what is propaganda from a Party to denigrate the other, and what is fact.
In 1999, he said that the dictatorship “should have shot some 30,000 corrupt people, starting with President Fernando Henrique Cardoso”
Comparing someone to Hitler today, without even measuring on a sensible scale, is something worthy of political propaganda of opposition parties to shock the public.
I'm sure there were naive Germans saying Hitler just wanted to make Germany prosperous. When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
Right at the beginning of the post I warned that I do not put any politician on pedestal, so I have several criticisms about the person Jair Bolsonaro, but all the criticisms that I have, are well grounded and do not diverge from reality, so if you are to criticize someone without Even know what you're talking about, do a research. I assure you that you will return with much more compelling arguments than these cliché phrases created to frighten some sheep.
<Seriously, if you search, you will see that there is quite a lot wrong, but within this lot of thing, also has phrases like: lessen the state, cut useless ministries, privatize practically everything, receive foreign capital, investors and etc.>
And it is in this kind of thing that I focused on the topic, because it is in fact what interests the forum.
<That in the case is the opposite of the PT ( Workers’ Party) that had plans to close the country more and more, and expand increasingly the state through the money <obviously> of the population and corruption.>
