Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 10:53:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 'CACHE'Project [VALM-Cache difficulty recalculation algorithm, SpamHash Control]  (Read 8133 times)
Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
April 27, 2020, 03:56:59 PM
 #141


  To date, I have not decided what will be indexed, only the Bitcoin address or the entire "CTxOut". The pursued idea...
When generating a new block "ProofOfStake" , all blocks related to the new block and its address for the previous 366 days will be searcheds.
Based on the calculated number of blocks and timestamps of these blocks, the code will be able to find out how they were generated.
1) The wallet has been turned on constantly.
2) Wallet is not always on.

Based on this data, interest for one year will be variable.
1) The wallet has been turned on constantly - two percent per annum.
2) Wallet is not always on - one percent per annum.

1715252030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252030
Reply with quote  #2

1715252030
Report to moderator
1715252030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252030
Reply with quote  #2

1715252030
Report to moderator
1715252030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252030
Reply with quote  #2

1715252030
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715252030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252030
Reply with quote  #2

1715252030
Report to moderator
1715252030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252030
Reply with quote  #2

1715252030
Report to moderator
1715252030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715252030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715252030
Reply with quote  #2

1715252030
Report to moderator
Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
May 03, 2020, 05:22:29 PM
 #142


New version available

CACHE-Project, The new ProofOfStake reward protocol, Testing, Work on the log file only

Version : v_6.1.1.43
Version of git : v_0.7.5.258
Subversion : v_0.7.6.55


Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
May 04, 2020, 04:04:10 PM
 #143


  The operation of the algorithm is information from the log file.

Code:
 
'CBlock->AddToBlockIndex()' - The new block pretends to a height 384608, block chain height 384607
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Now 2020 year, is 366 days
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Studied Bitcoin Address CHa8F8KzVtd1JHz3qiTFdAN8ecQZL5BF6Y
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total time in the study period 3297
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total blocks generate during the study period(Total   ) 8
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total blocks generate during the study period(Analysis) 7
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total minted during the study period(Total   ) 142,696
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total minted during the study period(Analysis) 142,696
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - ProfitabilityGen 87,5
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - ProfitabilityMint 100
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - ProfitabilityTotal 87,5
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Spacing Calculated(Analysis) 471
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Spacing Adjusted Tolerance(Analysis) 529,875
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 0
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 113,125
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 113,125
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 410,125
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 410,125
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 410,125
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 410,125
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Excellence Minting Coins, as a percentage(100) 0,471788
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Excellence Minting Coins, as a percentage(ProfitabilityTotal) 0,412815
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - RewardCoinYear Old 50000
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - RewardCoinYear New 32888
 'CTransaction::AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Reward New Value 17332260
     'CBlock->SetBestChainInner()' - Delete redundant memory transactions
     'CBlock->SetBestChainInner()' - Delete redundant memory transactions
 'CBlock->SetBestChain()' - new best=683d3b3a875c0e1e7205  height=384608  trust=1044073969692216  date=05/04/20 15:51:43
NoOtherInitialBlockDownload
Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
May 13, 2020, 06:30:16 AM
 #144


  Today I am sure that the task is realizable, the time spent on data collection and calculation is reduced to a minimum.
Completely indexing "CTxOut" does not make sense, only an address is needed.

Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
May 20, 2020, 10:11:22 AM
 #145

 
  I like the idea of paying rewards for POS coinage based on the age of the transactions. However, in the old version, I do not like the way
this function is implemented. In this function, the amount of remuneration is not calculated exactly, especially with small output amounts.
This circumstance is pushing some miners to split their balances into smaller ones in order to get more profit. It was decided to change the
principle of calculating the age of coins. In the preliminary calculation, I temporarily assumed that the reward for one year will be 100 percent
of the previous transaction amount. Then we calculate the time difference between the current and the previous transaction.

int64 nTimeDiff = (int64)tx.nTime - nPrevTxTime;

Next, we calculate how many coins will be credited for the calculated period "nTimeDiff" at the rate of one hundred percent for one year.

bnCoinTimeDiffTemp = CBigNum(nValueIn) * COIN / nOneYear * nTimeDiff; // 31622400

Now we need a fixed percentage of remuneration from the temporarily calculated "bnCoinTimeDiff".

bnSubsidy = bnCoinTimeDiffTemp / 100% * 5%;

All of these changes require testing.


Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
June 10, 2020, 02:47:28 PM
 #146


New version available

CACHE-Project, PPAPOS(Previous Period Activity Proof Of Stake) implementation, HardFork not assigned

Version : v_6.1.1.44
Version of git : v_0.7.5.271
Subversion : v_0.7.6.56

A re-synchronization of the block chain is required


Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
June 13, 2020, 05:54:06 PM
 #147


  Indexing "Stake" addresses allowed a different way to manage HardFork date. It is enough to set a condition under which HardFork will be
considered included in the case of the generation of the first block by a specific address. That is, after updating the wallet, a hard fork can
be executed at any time, without additional implementation.

Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 02:47:36 PM
 #148


    The operation of the algorithm is information from the log file.

Code:
IsOtherInitialBlockDownload
 'CBlock->SetBestChain()' - Hard Fork Switching Thresholds 0
 'ProcessBlock()' - ACCEPTED POS BLOCK, 83 Millis() for processing one block
2020-06-16 14:36:42 UTC received: block (527 bytes), sent a peer 145.239.189.106:2225
 'ProcessMessage()' - received block 498a76ee59d41ab0b927
CheckStakeKernelHash() : using modifier 0x78ab964f7d4fcf53 at height=14825 timestamp=2014-04-10 12:13:08 UTC for block from height=13907 timestamp=2014-04-01 15:04:56 UTC
CheckStakeKernelHash() : check protocol=10.0 modifier=0x78ab964f7d4fcf53 nTimeBlockFrom=1396364696 nTxPrevOffset=157 nTimeTxPrev=1396364696 nPrevout=1 nTimeTx=1407365387 hashProof=0000012107ce7db9ffb93391f2a9ab27ca12bbe6eaf8157710e5ccb917eaa235
 'CheckProofOfStake()' - Added Bitcoin Address CTxOut(nValue=5,5316, scriptPubKey=0267bbc371260b6ff4f61d734a96f930fe6a19f1ed25059f95639b7035f6bb270f OP_CHECKSIG) - COutPoint(203d68aa35, 1)
ComputeNextStakeModifier: prev modifier=0xfcb96406968504cf time=2014-08-06 18:38:34 UTC
 'CBlock->AddToBlockIndex()' - The new block pretends to a height 32028, block chain height 32027
 'CTransaction->GetAnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Now 2014 year, is 365 days
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nValueIn 5531600
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nPrevTxTime 1396364696
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nTxTime 1407365387
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nTimeDiff 11000691
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nCoinTimeDiff 1929576204855
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nValueIn 4856984
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nPrevTxTime 1394459379
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nTxTime 1407365387
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nTimeDiff 12906008
 'CTransaction->AnalysisGetCoinAge()' - nCoinTimeDiff 3917269214959
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Studied Bitcoin Address CUg1ihrexK395bEFqxTP8XqDky9zsFnGby
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total time in the study period 15762351
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total blocks generate during the study period(Total   ) 11611
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Total blocks generate during the study period(Analysis) 3598
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - ProfitabilityGen 30,988
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Spacing Calculated Total(Analysis) 1357,536043
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Spacing Calculated(Analysis) 4380,864647
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Matched Parameter 69,01214366
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Spacing(Preparing) 3023,32860362
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Factor 1,33247782275
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Pos Target Spacing Adjusted Tolerance(TargetSpacingCalculated) 1497053,05779
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Tolerance limit exceeded
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Graphics builder 2193429
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Excellence Minting Coins, as a percentage(100) 46,73
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - Excellence Minting Coins, as a percentage(ProfitabilityTotal) 32,249
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - RewardCoinYear Old 5(percent)
 'CTransaction->AnalysisProofOfStakeReward()' - RewardCoinYear New 3,34553(percent), max New 4,7(percent)
CTransaction->CheckInputsLevelTwo() : reward 195623 > analysis reward 131053
     'CBlock->SetBestChainInner()' - Delete redundant memory transactions
     'CBlock->SetBestChainInner()' - Delete redundant memory transactions
 'CBlock->SetBestChain()' - new best=498a76ee59d41ab0b927  height=32028  trust=14394568699840  date=06.08.2014 22:49:47
IsOtherInitialBlockDownload
 'CBlock->SetBestChain()' - Hard Fork Switching Thresholds 0
 'ProcessBlock()' - ACCEPTED POS BLOCK, 59 Millis() for processing one block
2020-06-16 14:36:42 UTC received: block (6400 bytes), sent a peer 145.239.189.106:2225
 'ProcessMessage()' - received block 000000013fcca17c4a40
ComputeNextStakeModifier: prev modifier=0xfcb96406968504cf time=2014-08-06 18:38:34 UTC
 'CBlock->AddToBlockIndex()' - The new block pretends to a height 32029, block chain height 32028

Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
June 21, 2020, 01:50:56 AM
 #149


New version available

CACHE-Project, PPAPOS(Previous Period Activity Proof Of Stake) implementation, HardFork pre activated - Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:31:50 GMT

Version : v_6.1.1.45
Version of git : v_0.7.5.275
Subversion : v_0.7.6.57

Full activation will occur when a ProofOfStake block is generated with the address "CP7N2wZmkqKkowQsPfUfbJFuXYRBSUxZiG"


Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
July 05, 2020, 03:04:39 AM
 #150


 Transaction to HardFork activation address.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/address.dws?CP7N2wZmkqKkowQsPfUfbJFuXYRBSUxZiG.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/tx.dws?c17629560c56971134496ab2fbccf074ab8b690b7cf6750c65c3e7fae71f1fb6.htm

minerja
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 297


View Profile
August 24, 2020, 08:58:04 AM
 #151

Hi Deff,
Hows things?

I have just built a new mining pc, and started from scratch with Win 10, and wallet "v6.1.1.45-g32a928e-cache-2018-beta-one"

I couldn't find a bootstrap, so i just started from zero, have to say, quickest sync so far, i think it took less that 8 hours, which seems a great improvement on the older wallets...

However, slightly concerned....i have ben mining in the wallet (setgenerate true Cool for over 30 hours, and not a single block....

{
"blocks" : 406288,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000095,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 8,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false,
"Nfactor" : 19,
"N" : 1048576,
"powreward-new" : 40.00000000,
"powreward-old" : 100.00000000
}

The wallet permanently says "out of sync", and you can see my hashrate says "0"

So i have duplicated this on 2 other PC's
1) i have tried cpuminer-opt 3.14.3 ...i get " json_rpc_call failed, retry after 10 seconds" error...
2) I have tried ccminer, and it "finds a block within a few minutes, but always fails
"[2020-08-24 09:16:00] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2020-08-24 09:16:00] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2020-08-24 09:16:00] 1 miner thread started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2020-08-24 09:16:00] scrypt block 406289, diff 0.00
[2020-08-24 09:16:00] GPU #0: 32 hashes / 4096.0 MB per warp.
[2020-08-24 09:16:01] GPU #0: using launch configuration T1x1
[2020-08-24 09:16:01] GPU #0: Intensity set to 5, 32 cuda threads
[2020-08-24 09:16:01] scrypt factor set to 19 (1048576)
[2020-08-24 09:41:30] accepted: 0/1 (diff 0.001), 5.73 H/s booooo solved: 1
"

I've checked the block explorer, and its seems we haven't had a POW block for over 2 days, but several POS blocks.
Yet someone managed to mine over 60 blocks in 24 hours.....3 days ago. That's more blocks than i have mined in 3 years ! (on / off, not continuous)
How can this be?

I think you have simply made this algo to "hit and miss"...sorry mate, but i can't say it any other way. I really hope you can fix it, cos i love scrypt:N coins, and TBH, this is about last man standing.

I have just had a look at the richlist and it is actually really depressing reading.
The top wallets are staking more coins than i can mine in a week...
What incentive does that give any new miner?

Remember months ago, you helped me compile a linux version...well that wallet, i managed to mine a total of 1000 coins in just over 1 week, bringing my 3 year total upto just over 3500 coins.
That wallet mined slowly, but consistently each day, until it lost all connections, and has never re-connected since (yes it has all the current live nodes)
That was the last time i gave in.

The new wallet i cna't get to compile on any versions of linux, so i tried the latest windows wallet, well you can see my results above...zero.

I honestly think, if you want to encourage any new miners, that this whole chain needs a start over....
Split to a "live" chain and a "test" chain, we can all dedicate a thread or 2, just to keep the test chain ticking over, so you can do your tweaks, but please lets get back to a chain that a normal small miner has some chance on.
As for the exsisting wallets...well thats hard, but how can someone with less that a 100 / 1000 coins be expected to compete with the 100K / 1 mil wallets?
Without a pool, virtually no chance to even get a coin nevermind a block.

Perhaps, look at say the most recent 50 wallets, total their balances, and do a new chain, premine that balance + 10% (10% for you), then distribute that balance to those 50 wallets...
That may give newbies some slight incentive to start mining.

Sorry to be so harsh, but lets face it, if there is no pool, and you cant mine a single block with 8t cpu in 36 hours, then i think the coin is dead.....or, you reward the current major share holders, and give up on POW altogether....the rich will get massively richer, and the rest...well......

J

BTW, it you're up for talking me thru compiling on either Ubuntu or Mint (versions 18/19/20) or my new fav LinuxLite 5 (much better for mining) , then i will happily try mining for another 36 hours....
minerja
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 297


View Profile
August 24, 2020, 09:18:29 AM
 #152

HI Deff,

Just been looking under "Options"
I see there are "Enable POW cpu mining", and "Enable POS cpu mining" optoins.
Should the POW be ticked or unticked for use with external miner? I have tried both ways, and neither affects the green status of POW, POS in the bottom right corner of wallet?
I'm guessing ticking / unticking them should do something?

I am also trying all the versions i can of cpuminer -opt..... now i see a
"JSON-RPC call failed: Unable to sign block, wallet locked?
[2020-08-24 10:17:16] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2020-08-24 10:17:16] ...retry after 10 seconds"

I simply "run" the wallet, on its defaults, it is not "encrypted, etc"

Any ideas?
Can you recommend an external miner?

Thanks
J
minerja
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 297


View Profile
August 24, 2020, 12:35:38 PM
 #153

Hi miners.

Just wondering guys n gals.
Who else here, is actually mining this coin ?

I'd love to hear your experiences, what hash rate you have, what rig you have, and roughly how many coins a day you are mining.

Also, same with the staking people....
How much, get you how much?
What would i get with roughly 3000 coins?

The only 2 addresses i can see who have won blocks in the past 24 hours, are
1 address with 42,000+ coins --- got 42+ coins in last 24 hours
2 address with 2,000,000+ coins --- get 760+ coins in the last 24 hours. and got over 3400 coins the day before.

That second address is staking more a day than i have ever mined !

From the figures, it seems this is pretty much a 1 horse POS coin (Proof Of Stake - not Piece of...)

J
Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
August 27, 2020, 03:20:00 PM
 #154

HI Deff,

Just been looking under "Options"
I see there are "Enable POW cpu mining", and "Enable POS cpu mining" optoins.
Should the POW be ticked or unticked for use with external miner? I have tried both ways, and neither affects the green status of POW, POS in the bottom right corner of wallet?
I'm guessing ticking / unticking them should do something?

I am also trying all the versions i can of cpuminer -opt..... now i see a
"JSON-RPC call failed: Unable to sign block, wallet locked?
[2020-08-24 10:17:16] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2020-08-24 10:17:16] ...retry after 10 seconds"

I simply "run" the wallet, on its defaults, it is not "encrypted, etc"

Any ideas?
Can you recommend an external miner?

Thanks
J

Hi! Now I'm testing a new algorithm for rewarding POS coin minting. I will check your problem as soon as possible.

Deff (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 939
Merit: 261

Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information


View Profile
September 22, 2020, 04:27:26 AM
 #155

 
 Switching to a new algorithm in 40 days (approximately)

minerja
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 297


View Profile
November 25, 2020, 03:32:45 PM
 #156


New version available

CACHE-Project, PPAPOS(Previous Period Activity Proof Of Stake) implementation, HardFork pre activated - Sun, 21 Jun 2020 00:31:50 GMT

Version : v_6.1.1.45
Version of git : v_0.7.5.275
Subversion : v_0.7.6.57

Full activation will occur when a ProofOfStake block is generated with the address "CP7N2wZmkqKkowQsPfUfbJFuXYRBSUxZiG"




Hi Deff,
I'm getting slightly concerned about mining this project.

I am using this wallet
"version" : "v6.1.1.45-g32a928e-cache-2018-beta-one",
"protocolversion" : 91004,
"walletversion" : 60000,

Which came from your link above...i compiled it on
OS: Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS x86_64
 Kernel: 5.4.0-53-generic

If i mine from the wallet, it literally finds 1 block a day, yet on the same PC if i use say cpuminer-opt i find a few blocks a day....
However, my main concern is....on days when the reported hash is say 2H/s, and i am mining with say 20H/s so 10x the hashrate, i still lose out blocks to to other miners...no idea why, also, i have only 1 connection
According to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/#!network wallet /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.57/ has this node addnode=195.200.244.73

In fact these all the nodes from the last 24 hrs...
addnode=195.200.244.73 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.57/

addnode=185.153.44.81 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.55/
addnode=195.24.145.246 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.55/

addnode=63.142.251.194 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.52/

addnode=176.120.220.206 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.51/
addnode=78.156.235.93 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.51/
addnode=85.19.25.38 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.51/
==========================================================
Yet the only wallet i ever connect to is addnode=63.142.251.194 /'CACHE'Project 2018:0.7.6.52/
==========================================================
i see this in my debug.log
connected 195.200.244.73:2225
send version message: version 91004, blocks=339519, us=0.0.0.0:0, them=195.200.244.73:2225, peer=195.200.244.73:2225
socket closed
disconnecting node 195.200.244.73:2225

So my worries are
1) Am i using the correct wallet?
2) Why do i have only 1 connection, and to a diff wallet version, when there is clearly 1 peer using same wallet as me
3) Am i on the correct chain? Has the chain split?
4) When i have 10x the network hashrate why am i still losing blocks?
5) Why do i have to mine 24/7   when for most of the day the POW part is "locked" seems like i am wasting electricity in those periods? Does the internal miner only mine when it needs to? According to my external miner i find more blocks when the POW is RED than GREEN so they get rejected
6) Is there any point in any of us actually mining when these are peoples STAKING rewards....(bearing in mind when the hashrate is below 10H/s and i am mining @ 20-30H/s and only get say 500-600 coins a day - most days is more like 200-300 coins)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422732.htm (486.353279 CACHE )
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422716.htm (35,164.533266 CACHE

Look at that last stake 35000 coins in 1 day, thats like 30-40 days mining.

For me, 1st thing 1st....can you confirm i am on the correct chain (what is the seed node)
Then can you please look at the reward system....it seems to me it doesnt much matter if i mine with 5H/s or 50H/s i get virtually same random blocks....which is nuts, mining all day when wallet is locked for 60% of time seems very UN-enviromentally friendly, and the STAKING, well hows about higher interest rates for small pots and less for larger pots, at least just for a while to try and even out the "RICHLIST"
The 35000 coins STAKER has acheived that value ruffly each day this week, so thats heading towards 6 months worth of mining in 4 days....makes mining this coin completely pointless.

Also, if 1 miner is getting 35000coins+ a day, i can only imagine what will happen to the price if they dump them.....

Hope you have some good ideas cos this is about the only original coin still going...

J

brian_nguyen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 25, 2020, 03:41:45 PM
 #157

...
6) Is there any point in any of us actually mining when these are peoples STAKING rewards....(bearing in mind when the hashrate is below 10H/s and i am mining @ 20-30H/s and only get say 500-600 coins a day - most days is more like 200-300 coins)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422732.htm (486.353279 CACHE )
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422716.htm (35,164.533266 CACHE

Look at that last stake 35000 coins in 1 day, thats like 30-40 days mining.

For me, 1st thing 1st....can you confirm i am on the correct chain (what is the seed node)
Then can you please look at the reward system....it seems to me it doesnt much matter if i mine with 5H/s or 50H/s i get virtually same random blocks....which is nuts, mining all day when wallet is locked for 60% of time seems very UN-enviromentally friendly, and the STAKING, well hows about higher interest rates for small pots and less for larger pots, at least just for a while to try and even out the "RICHLIST"
The 35000 coins STAKER has acheived that value ruffly each day this week, so thats heading towards 6 months worth of mining in 4 days....makes mining this coin completely pointless.

Also, if 1 miner is getting 35000coins+ a day, i can only imagine what will happen to the price if they dump them.....

Hope you have some good ideas cos this is about the only original coin still going...

J



That is just the block of coins that staked. Whomever had that 35,000 coins only generated 0.871 CACHE for that transaction.

0.0 CACHE
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s)
0.871052 CACHE
minerja
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 297


View Profile
November 25, 2020, 03:50:18 PM
 #158

...
6) Is there any point in any of us actually mining when these are peoples STAKING rewards....(bearing in mind when the hashrate is below 10H/s and i am mining @ 20-30H/s and only get say 500-600 coins a day - most days is more like 200-300 coins)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422732.htm (486.353279 CACHE )
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422716.htm (35,164.533266 CACHE

Look at that last stake 35000 coins in 1 day, thats like 30-40 days mining.

For me, 1st thing 1st....can you confirm i am on the correct chain (what is the seed node)
Then can you please look at the reward system....it seems to me it doesnt much matter if i mine with 5H/s or 50H/s i get virtually same random blocks....which is nuts, mining all day when wallet is locked for 60% of time seems very UN-enviromentally friendly, and the STAKING, well hows about higher interest rates for small pots and less for larger pots, at least just for a while to try and even out the "RICHLIST"
The 35000 coins STAKER has acheived that value ruffly each day this week, so thats heading towards 6 months worth of mining in 4 days....makes mining this coin completely pointless.

Also, if 1 miner is getting 35000coins+ a day, i can only imagine what will happen to the price if they dump them.....

Hope you have some good ideas cos this is about the only original coin still going...

J



That is just the block of coins that staked. Whomever had that 35,000 coins only generated 0.871 CACHE for that transaction.

0.0 CACHE
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s)
0.871052 CACHE

OK, happy to put my hand up and say i'm wrong, but thats even more confusing so 35000 coins only gets a stale of 0.87 coins, yet the few 1000 coins when it finally does stake gets me more like 10-20 coins....so confusing...
brian_nguyen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 25, 2020, 03:56:54 PM
 #159

...
6) Is there any point in any of us actually mining when these are peoples STAKING rewards....(bearing in mind when the hashrate is below 10H/s and i am mining @ 20-30H/s and only get say 500-600 coins a day - most days is more like 200-300 coins)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422732.htm (486.353279 CACHE )
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422716.htm (35,164.533266 CACHE

Look at that last stake 35000 coins in 1 day, thats like 30-40 days mining.

For me, 1st thing 1st....can you confirm i am on the correct chain (what is the seed node)
Then can you please look at the reward system....it seems to me it doesnt much matter if i mine with 5H/s or 50H/s i get virtually same random blocks....which is nuts, mining all day when wallet is locked for 60% of time seems very UN-enviromentally friendly, and the STAKING, well hows about higher interest rates for small pots and less for larger pots, at least just for a while to try and even out the "RICHLIST"
The 35000 coins STAKER has acheived that value ruffly each day this week, so thats heading towards 6 months worth of mining in 4 days....makes mining this coin completely pointless.

Also, if 1 miner is getting 35000coins+ a day, i can only imagine what will happen to the price if they dump them.....

Hope you have some good ideas cos this is about the only original coin still going...

J


That is just the block of coins that staked. Whomever had that 35,000 coins only generated 0.871 CACHE for that transaction.

0.0 CACHE
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s)
0.871052 CACHE

OK, happy to put my hand up and say i'm wrong, but thats even more confusing so 35000 coins only gets a stale of 0.87 coins, yet the few 1000 coins when it finally does stake gets me more like 10-20 coins....so confusing...

It depends on the age of the coins as well I believe, so if you wait 10 days and unlock your wallet then you get more than a 35K coin block that is constantly stake and it's looking that way.
minerja
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1248
Merit: 297


View Profile
November 25, 2020, 03:59:39 PM
 #160

...
6) Is there any point in any of us actually mining when these are peoples STAKING rewards....(bearing in mind when the hashrate is below 10H/s and i am mining @ 20-30H/s and only get say 500-600 coins a day - most days is more like 200-300 coins)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422732.htm (486.353279 CACHE )
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cache/block.dws?422716.htm (35,164.533266 CACHE

Look at that last stake 35000 coins in 1 day, thats like 30-40 days mining.

For me, 1st thing 1st....can you confirm i am on the correct chain (what is the seed node)
Then can you please look at the reward system....it seems to me it doesnt much matter if i mine with 5H/s or 50H/s i get virtually same random blocks....which is nuts, mining all day when wallet is locked for 60% of time seems very UN-enviromentally friendly, and the STAKING, well hows about higher interest rates for small pots and less for larger pots, at least just for a while to try and even out the "RICHLIST"
The 35000 coins STAKER has acheived that value ruffly each day this week, so thats heading towards 6 months worth of mining in 4 days....makes mining this coin completely pointless.

Also, if 1 miner is getting 35000coins+ a day, i can only imagine what will happen to the price if they dump them.....

Hope you have some good ideas cos this is about the only original coin still going...

J


That is just the block of coins that staked. Whomever had that 35,000 coins only generated 0.871 CACHE for that transaction.

0.0 CACHE
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s)
0.871052 CACHE

OK, happy to put my hand up and say i'm wrong, but thats even more confusing so 35000 coins only gets a stale of 0.87 coins, yet the few 1000 coins when it finally does stake gets me more like 10-20 coins....so confusing...

It depends on the age of the coins as well I believe, so if you wait 10 days and unlock your wallet then you get more than a 35K coin block that is constantly stake and it's looking that way.

So, rather than mine in 1 wallet and then send them to my staking wallet, you seem to be suggesting i will be better just mining and staking from the same wallet?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!